Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2019 Feb 7.
Published in final edited form as: J Am Acad Audiol. 2018 Feb;29(2):118–124. doi: 10.3766/jaaa.16107

Table 2.

Most common approach used by respondents in the fitting of signal processing features. Respondents were instructed to choose one approach.

Gain WDRC Time
Constants
Noise
Suppression
Feedback Directional
Mic
Frequency
Lowering
Approach
Prescriptive (NAL-NL1/2; DSL v 5/m[i/o]) 44%^ NA NA NA NA NA
Manufacturer's "first fit" 40%^ 80%* 58%* 69%* 67%* 35%^
My own expertise 14%^ 18%^ 38%^ 25%^ 30%^ 36%^
Other approach 1% 2% 3% 3% 3% 6%
Do not use at initial fit 0% 0% 2% 3% 0% 17%^

A * in cells indicates approach most commonly used by a majority (>50%) of audiologists;

a ^ in cells indicates most common approach used by some (10-50%) audiologists;

NA indicates the approach is not applicable.