Skip to main content
. 2019 Feb 7;14(2):e0211649. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0211649

Table 5. Multivariate analysis and log-rank test for PFS and OS at interim and end-of-treatment PET/CT.

  Multivariate analysis
iPET4 (n = 181) 1st model PFS OS
Variables Cox regression analysis Log rank test Cox regression analysis Log rank test
  HR 95%CI p-value HR 95%CI p-value
rDS 14.23 [3.56–56.86] 0.0002 5.23 [2.96–9.25] <0.0001
ΔSUVmax 3.33 [1.36–8.17] 0.008 NS >0.1
ΔSUVmax + rDS 6.86 [1.37–34.13] 0.019 NS >0.1
Deauville score NS >0.1 NS >0.1
Menton 2011 criteria NS >0.1 NS >0.1
iPET4 (n = 181) 2nd model            
rDS 4.46 [2.72–7.30] <0.0001 2.71 [1.55–4.74] 0.0005
IPI score 2.54 [1.48–4.39] 0.0008 2.30 [1.19–4.46] 0.013
Chemotherapy 2.28 [1.16–4.49] 0.016 2.73 [1.19–6.24] 0.017
ΔSUVmax NS >0.1 NS >0.1
Deauville score NS >0.1 NS >0.1
PET-eot (n = 165)            
rDS 8.11 [4.68–14.05] <0.0001 6.50 [3.49–12.12] <0.0001
IPI score 2.01 [1.11–3.65] 0.02 2.21 [1.07–4.55] 0.03
Deauville score NS >0.1 NS >0.1
Chemotherapy NS >0.1 NS >0.1

PFS: Progression Free survival; OS: Overall Survival; NS: Not Significant; rDS: ratio Deauville Score = Tumour/Liver SUVmax ratio

Menton 2011 criteria: ΔSUVmax if eligible patient and DS if SUVmax initial tumour <10 and / or if SUVmax residual tumour >5

ΔSUVmax + rDS: ΔSUVmax if eligible patient and rDS if SUVmax initial tumour <10 and / or if SUVmax residual tumour >5

IPI: International Prognostic Index.