Skip to main content
. 2019 Feb 7;14(2):e0211684. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0211684

Table 1. Comparison of demographics and clinical characteristics between assaulted and non-assaulted patients.

Demographics Mechanism of TBI Number valid (%) p-value
Non-assault Assault
Number of patients 159 43 202 (100)
Median Age (IQR) 50.4 (26.5–63.4) 29.3 (22.1–36.4) 179 (88.6) <0.001
Proportion Male 74.2% 90.7% 202 (100) 0.023
Ethnicity White 87.9% 72.1% 200 (99.0) 0.014
Asian 7.6% 23.3%
Other 4.5% 4.7%
Median follow-up interval (IQR) [months] 5.1 (3.6–7.6) 6.2 (3.7–8.3) 174 (86.1) 0.606
Severity (GCS) Severe 21.8% 14.0% 190 (94.1) 0.398
Moderate 10.9% 16.3%
Mild 67.3% 69.8%
Median Marshall Classification (IQR) 2 (2–4) 2 (2–3) 170 (84.2) 0.908
Glasgow Outcome Score 3 21.8% 0.0% 105 (52) 0.122
4 25.7% 37.0%
5 52.6% 63.0%
Median days hospitalised (IQR) 11 (5–22) 5 (3.25–14) 175 (86.6) 0.015
Median days ITU (IQR) 0 (0–6) 0 (0–1.75) 176 (87.1) 0.047
Extracranial trauma from event 36.5% 20.9% 202 (100) 0.068
Previous co-morbidities 50.3% 25.6% 202 (100) 0.005
Neurosurgery required 32.0% 36.6% 191 (95.6) 0.579
Loss of Consciousness at scene 55.9% 75.8% 151 (74.8) 0.045
Post-traumatic amnesia 25.2% 30.2% 202 (100) 0.559
Alcohol involved during injury 33.3% 56.3% 134 (66.3) 0.024
Litigation after injury 4.4% 4.7% 202 (100) 0.944

]All patients completed the QOLIBRI questionnaire sufficiently to be included in analysis (n = 202). Fewer patients completed the RPQ (n = 177), PHQ-9 (n = 160), PCL-C (n = 144), HIT (n = 148), and IES (n = 129). For the PCL-C, HIT and IES, 35 fewer patients were offered the questionnaire. All other variation is due to incomplete responses being excluded from analysis.