Table 4. Adjusted associations between animal ethics orientations and stated behaviour in areas where animals are used, having a cat or dog, and animal-related opinions and trust (N = 974–1002)–coefficients from multivariate models^A.

	Animal rights	Anthropo-centrism	Animal protection	Lay utili-tarian
Number of animal theme parks visitedB	n.s.	-0.06**	0.009***	n.s.
Frequency of meat eatingC	n.s.	n.s.	0.006***	0.004**
Animal welfare-friendly meat consumptionD	0.016***	-0.11**	n.s.	-0.11***
Semi-vegetarianismE	0.015**	n.s.	n.s.	n.s.
Cat ownershipE	n.s.	n.s.	-0.09*	-0.09*
Dog ownershipE	n.s.	-0.14***	n.s.	n.s.
Trust in current animal welfare legislationD	n.s.	0.031***	0.010***	0.014***
Endorsing an NGO animal welfare campaignC	0.005***	-0.005**	0.004*	-0.08***
Endorsing a campaign from the Danish meat and agricultural farmers’ associationC	n.s.	n.s.	0.08***	n.s.
Non-concern about animal welfareC	-0.003**	0.016***	n.s.	0.010***

* p<0.05

** p<0.01

*** p<0.001; n.s: not significant at the 0.05 level

^A Control variables in all analyses were: gender, age, household type (single adult, two adults (no children), and household with children), educational level, and living area.

^B Reported coefficients are from a Poisson regression (suitable when the dependent variable is a count variable).

^C Reported coefficients are from ols regression.

^D Reported coefficients are from an ordinal logit regression.

E Reported coefficients are from a logit regression.