Skip to main content
. 2019 Feb 7;2019(2):CD012730. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012730.pub2

9. Ciprofloxacin (500 mg twice daily) with adalimumab compared to placebo with adalimumab for induction and maintenance of remission in Crohn's disease.

Ciprofloxacin with adalimumab compared to placebo with adalimumab for induction and maintenance of remission in Crohn's disease
Patient or population: Participants with active CD
 Setting: Outpatient
 Intervention: Ciprofloxacin with adalimumab
 Comparison: Placebo with adalimumab
Outcomes Anticipated absolute effects* (95% CI) Relative effect
 (95% CI) № of participants
 (studies) Quality of the evidence
 (GRADE) Comments
Risk with placebo with adalimumab Risk with Ciprofloxacin with adalimumab
Failure to enter clinical remission
Follow‐up: 12 weeks
359 per 1,000 244 per 1,000
 (118 to 492) RR 0.68
 (0.33 to 1.37) 76
 (1 RCT) ⊕⊕⊝⊝
 LOW 1 Clinical remission was defined as the closure of all fistulas
All patients were treated with self‐administered adalimumab (patients were given induction dosing of 160 mg at day 0 and 80 mg at week 2, followed by maintenance of 40 mg every 4 weeks until week 24)
Failure to maintain clinical remission
Follow‐up: 24 weeks
See comments Although the authors reported on this outcome, we did not include it as participants only received ciprofloxacin up to week 12. All participants received maintenance adalimumab after week 12
Failure to have clinical response Not reported This outcome was not reported
Failure to maintain endoscopic remission Not reported This outcome was not reported
Adverse Events
Follow‐up: 12‐24 weeks
872 per 1,000 837 per 1,000
 (697 to 1,000) RR 0.96
 (0.80 to 1.16) 76
 (1 RCT) ⊕⊕⊕⊝
 MODERATE 3 Adverse events included respiratory tract infection, fatigue and headache
Serious adverse events
Follow‐up: 12‐24 weeks
77 per 1,000 81 per 1,000
 (18 to 377) RR 1.05
 (0.23 to 4.90) 76
 (1 RCT) ⊕⊕⊝⊝
 LOW 4 Serious adverse events included sagittal sinus thrombosis, severe disease flares, herpes simplex infection and parastomal herniation
Withdrawal due to adverse events
Follow‐up: 12‐24 weeks
77 per 1,000 54 per 1,000
 (9 to 305) RR 0.70
 (0.12 to 3.97) 76
 (1 RCT) ⊕⊕⊝⊝
 LOW 5 Specific adverse events causing withdrawal were not reported
*The risk in the intervention group (and its 95% confidence interval) is based on the assumed risk in the comparison group and the relative effect of the intervention (and its 95% CI).
 
 CI: Confidence interval; RR: Risk ratio; OR: Odds ratio;
GRADE Working Group grades of evidenceHigh quality: We are very confident that the true effect lies close to that of the estimate of the effect
 Moderate quality: We are moderately confident in the effect estimate: The true effect is likely to be close to the estimate of the effect, but there is a possibility that it is substantially different
 Low quality: Our confidence in the effect estimate is limited: The true effect may be substantially different from the estimate of the effect
 Very low quality: We have very little confidence in the effect estimate: The true effect is likely to be substantially different from the estimate of effect

1 Downgraded two levels due to very sparse data (23 events)

2 Downgraded two levels due to very sparse data (29 events)

3 Downgraded one level due to sparse data (65 events)

4 Downgraded two levels due to very sparse data (6 events)

5 Downgraded two levels due to very sparse data (5 events)