Skip to main content
. 2019 Feb 15;29(1):010707. doi: 10.11613/BM.2019.010707

Table 2. Between-method variability for measuring faecal calprotectin with respect to the extraction method used and stool consistency.

Hard Stool Normal Stool Liquid Stool
FC concentration mg/kg P* FC concentration, mg/kg Mean bias,% FC concentration, mg/kg Mean bias,% FC concentration, mg/kg Mean bias,% P
Weighing method comparison, N = 52
EliA™ Calprotectin 104.0
(36.0 - 415.0)
0.025 84.8
(22.0 - 257.5)
87.9
(N = 8)
74.0
(26.0 - 217.5)
38.1
(N = 29)
162.0
(58.5 - 1045.5)
- 8.4
(N = 15)
0.005
(1)/ (2)/ (3)
Bühlmann fCAL® Turbo 160.5
(59.5 - 611.0)
491.5
(127.0 - 611.0)
124.0
(57.8 - 373.5)
152.0
(66.5 - 929.3)
EliA Stool Extraction Kit vs Calex® Cap “N”, N = 77
EliA™ Calprotectin 91.0
(38.1 - 453.5)
< 0.001 27.0
(19.3 - 61.3)
89.2
(N = 11)
77.0
(32.3 - 390.0)
64.1
(N = 47)
277.0
(88.8 - 924.3)
8.1
(N = 19)
< 0.001
(3)/ (1) (2)
Bühlmann fCAL® Turbo 190.5
(76.3 - 710.9)
103.5
(41.1 - 594.1)
249.0
(74.8 - 555.9)
203.5
(95.8 - 999.1)
FC - faecal calprotectin concentration is presented as median (interquartile range). *Wilcoxon test. Stool classes are presented according to Bristol stool scale (BSS): hard (BSS 1, 2), normal (BSS 3, 4, 5) and liquid (BSS 6, 7). Kruskal-Wallis test with Conover post-hoc pairwise comparison. Mean bias - mean of calculated biases (Bias = [(FCfCAL Turbo – FCEliA) / ((FCfCAL Turbo+FCEliA)/2)] x 100). P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. The allowable bias was set at 22.6%. (1)/ (2)/ (3) - respective biases differ significantly between 3 classes according to stool consistency; (3)/ (1) (2) - bias obtained for class 3 is significantly different from respective biases obtained for classes 1 and 2 according to stool consistency.