Skip to main content
. 2019 Jan 22;11(2):501–522. doi: 10.18632/aging.101756

Table 4. Sensitivity analysis results for high-quality studies on the prognostic effects of PD-L1 in HNC patients.

Variable Study no. Sample size HR (95% CI) P value Heterogeneity
I2 P value
OS Overall 17 2581 0.754 (0.568-1.002) 0.051 76.6% <0.001
Ethnicity
Asian 7 1255 0.720 (0.385-1.348) 0.305 88.1% <0.001
Caucasian 10 1326 0.742 (0.578-0.954) 0.020 46.1% 0.054
Tumor location
OSCC 5 531 0.653 (0.292-1.462) 0.300 90.7% <0.001
NPC 3 389 0.649 (0.458-0.920) 0.015 0.0% 0.744
OPSCC 3 495 0.975 (0.771-1.234) 0.835 0.0% 0.403
LSCC 1 260 0.635 (0.393-1.025) 0.063 - -
Sample size
Large 7 1715 0.984 (0.659-1.468) 0.936 79.5% <0.001
Small 10 866 0.582 (0.426-0.796) 0.001 50.3% 0.034
DFS Overall 7 1066 0.928 (0.618-1.392) 0.717 69.4% 0.003
Ethnicity
Asian 3 416 0.809 (0.241-2.720) 0.732 85.8% 0.001
Caucasian 4 650 0.938 (0.663-1.328) 0.719 43.6% 0.150
Tumor location
OSCC 2 148 0.699 (0.114-4.263) 0.697 78.4% 0.032
NPC 2 348 1.215 (0.288-5.133) 0.791 91.0% 0.001
OPSCC 1 181 1.090 (0.783-1.518) 0.610 - -
LSCC 1 260 0.591 (0.351-0.996) 0.048 - -
Sample size
Large 3 650 0.753 (0.485-1.171) 0.208 66.8% 0.049
Small 4 416 1.146 (0.536-2.450) 0.725 71.0% 0.016
PFS Overall 3 188 0.618 (0.388-0.985) 0.043 0.0% 0.867