. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2020 Feb 1.

Published in final edited form as: Psychol Aging. 2018 Dec 13;34(1):91–105. doi: 10.1037/pag0000309

Table 3.

Linear Multilevel Models of Age Predicting Non-Stressor and Stressor-Related Negative Affect

	EMA					EOD
	ESCAPE^a	SAWM^a	SHADE	WDL	NTH	ESCAPE^a	SAWM^a	NSDE	WFH
Model 1	Estimate (SE)	Estimate (SE)	Estimate (SE)	Estimate (SE)	Estimate (SE)	Estimate (SE)	Estimate (SE)	Estimate (SE)	Estimate (SE)
	1.859	1.420	1.187	1.968	0.675	2.232	1.026	0.367	0.566
Intercept	(0.141)^**	(0.098)^**	(0.207)^**	(0.144)^**	(0.052)^**	(0.111)^**	(0.191)^**	(0.016)^**	(0.061)^**
Age	−0.013	−0.019	−0.014	−0.023	−0.004	−.0.021	−0.030	−0.001	−0.019
Age	(0.009)	(0.006)^**	(0.009)	(0.011)^*	(0.004)	(0.010)^*	(0.007)^**	(0.001)	(0.007)^*
WP Stressor	1.552	1.821	1.350	0.307	.938	0.978	0.998	0.518	0.595
WP Stressor	(0.080)^**	(0.124)^**	(0.104)^**	(0.102)^**	(0.059)^**	(0.086)^**	(0.146)^**	(0.020)^**	(0.052)^**
WP	−0.016	−0.006	−0.002	0.004	−0.002	−0.011	−0.003	−0.006	−0.010
Stressor*Age	(0.007)^*	(0.007)	(0.008)	(0.008)	(0.004)	(0.008)	(0.008)	(0.001)^**	(0.006)
Pseudo R²	3.13%	3.87%	0.41%	0.03%	−0.11%	3.09%	1.36%	2.52%	-^†
Model 2
	1.736	1.146	1.011	2.067	0.747	2.205	1.339	0.496	0.925
Intercept	(0.220)^**	(0.324)^*	(0.370)^**	(0.343)^**	(0.153)^*	(0.220)^**	(0.402)^**	(0.028)^**	(0.084)^**
	−0.012	−0.022	−0.010	−0.017	−0.005	−0.023	−0.030	−0.003	−0.011
Age	(0.010)	(0.007)^**	(0.009)	(0.012)	(0.005)	(0.011)^*	(0.008)^**	(0.001)^*	(0.008)
	1.657	3.063	1.239	0.710	1.086	0.955	0.947	0.512	0.568
WP Stressor	(0.140)^**	(0.335)^**	(0.276)^**	(0.275)^**	(0.160)^**	(0.155)^**	(0.406)^*	(0.034)^**	(0.071)^**
WP	−0.019	0.011	0.001	−0.008	−0.008	−0.010	−0.006	−0.007	−0.005
Stressor*Age	(0.008)^**	(0.008)	(0.008)	(0.010)	(0.005)	(0.008)	(0.009)	(0.001)^**	(0.007)

Note. WP: Within-Person. EMA: Ecological Momentary Assessment. EOD: End-of-Day. SE: Standard Error.

p<.05,

^**

p<.01. Age was centered at 46 years old in each study. Model 1: Age only. Model 2: Model 1 plus covariates (sex, education, race, employment status, marital status, and day of week).

Hybrid studies providing both EMA and EOD assessments.

^†

Pseudo-R² could not be calculated for the WFH EOD study as the random slope was not statistically significant and its inclusion resulted in model a model convergence error (see Footnote 2).