Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2020 Feb 1.
Published in final edited form as: Psychol Aging. 2018 Sep 13;34(1):56–67. doi: 10.1037/pag0000291

Table 1.

Participant Characteristics

Positive Stereotype Negative Stereotype

Measure High
Accountability
(n =38)
Low
Accountability
(n = 35)
High
Accountability
(n = 35)
Low
Accountability
(n = 36)

M SD M SD M SD M SD
Age 73.7 6.6 71.1 4.4 72.4 6.3 71.4 5.4
Education 17.2 2.4 17.2 3.0 17.3 2.4 17.4 2.3
SF36 Physical
Hlth.
45.2 2.7 45.4 3.1 45.3 2.9 45.4 3.3
SF36 Mental
Hlth.1
44.8 3.7 46.0 4.3 45.6 4.0 44.0 4.7
Geriatric
Depression Scale
1.3 2.2 1.1 1.9 1.1 1.5 1.2 1.6
Letter-Number
Sequencing
10.0 2.6 9.7 2.4 10.3 2.2 10.8 2.9
Digit-Symbol
Substitution
63.4 14.2 60.4 11.1 63.91 12.0 64.3 10.6
Vocabulary 27.1 4.5 27.8 4.0 26.2 7.5 27.6 4.0
Need for Cognition2 4.6 0.7 4.3 0.9 4.5 0.8 4.2 0.6
Expectations
Regarding Aging
56.9 13.4 57.9 21.6 56.7 17.5 58.6 18.0
Baseline Systolic
Blood Pressure3
131.4 19.7 134.1 19.7 134.8 20.2 124.6 16.4
1

Significant Stereotype × Motivation interaction (p = .04).

2

Significant motivation effect (p = .02), with scores in high motivation condition (M = 4.6) being greater than those in the low motivation condition (M = 4.3).

3

Significant Stereotype × Motivation interaction (p = .047).