Skip to main content
. 2018 Aug 7;1464(1):5–29. doi: 10.1111/nyas.13948

Table 1.

Advantages and disadvantages of fNIRS

Advantages Disadvantages
  • Safe

  • Better spatial resolution than EEG

  • Better temporal resolution than fMRI

  • Tolerance to motion artifacts

  • Possibility to monitor HbO2 and HbR

  • Portability

  • Low cost

  • Silent

  • Availability of miniaturized and wearable systems

  • Suitability for long‐time continuous monitoring

  • Feasibility for multimodal imaging

  • Compatibility with other electrical and magnetic devices

  • More participant friendly than fMRI

  • All participants are eligible (all ages, no exclusion criteria)

  • Lower temporal resolution than EEG/MEG

  • Lower spatial resolution than fMRI

  • Penetration depth (1.5–2 cm)

  • Impossibility to gather structural images and anatomical information

  • Systemic interferences

  • Variable SNR

  • Optodes placement can be time consuming in case of hairy regions and a high number of sources and detectors

  • Higher susceptibility to motion errors and less comfort in case of high‐coverage measurements with fiber optics coupled to the head

  • Lack of standardization in data analysis