Skip to main content
. 2019 Feb 7;10:634. doi: 10.1038/s41467-019-08553-y

Table 3.

Correlation (R2) between QTAIM and NLMO properties (PBE0) of the M–E interaction in [C]=M=E ([C]=C(PH2NSiH3)2; M=Ce, Th, U; E=C(CH3)2, NCH3, O)a

Variables R 2
C(CH3)2 NCH3 O
Total M character in σ bonding M-E NLMO (%) vs ρBCP 0.941 0.967 0.950
vs HBCP 0.773 0.956 0.943
vs δ(M,E) 0.956 0.933 0.918
Total M f orbital character in σ bonding M-E NLMO (%) vs ρBCP 0.937 0.967 0.953
vs HBCP 0.766 0.976 0.965
vs δ(M,E) 0.953 0.657 0.939

aρBCP is the bond critical point between the M and C/N/O centres, HBCP is the total energy density at that bond critical point, and δ(M,E) is the delocalisation index between the M and C/N/O atomic basins