Skip to main content
. 2018 Dec 11;33(2):235–243. doi: 10.1038/s41433-018-0304-z

Table 1.

Imaging modalities for thyroid orbitopathy and their characteristics

Imaging modality Type of signal Dangers Utility in TED Advantages Disadvantages Provides a quantifiable marker of disease activity?
CT X-ray Radiation- and iodine-based contrast Better than MRI at identifying enlarged muscles [23]. Density of muscles can correlate with disease [24] Fast. Better bone resolution than MRI. Good for assessment of apical crowding [1] Radiation. Volumetry of muscles may not correlate with disease activity [25] Mainly proptosis
MRI Nuclear magnetic resonance Patients with certain active or passive implants may be contraindicated Better than CT at identifying areas of inflammation in muscle Better contrast between soft tissues than CT. Different sequences provide specific anatomical or physiological information Slow. Acoustic noise. Costly. Movement artefacts Potentially, but most clinical protocols provide qualitative or semi-quantitative data
Ultrasound Sound echo None Limited Rapid. Available. Can perhaps exclude scleritis and intraocular pathology User-dependent. Limited depth. No visualisation of apex. Limited reproducibility No
Doppler Sound echo None Limited clinical utility but blood flow in superior ophthalmic vein is reduced in TED [26] Rapid. Available Difficult to perform. Inter-observer variability. Not specific for TED No
Octreoscan with 111In γ-Ray scintigraphy High radiation Limited Orbital uptake of this labelled somatostatin analogue is greater in TED Non-specific. High cost. Poor availability. Requires careful standardisation No
Octreoscan with 99Tm γ-Rray scintigraphy Lower radiation Limited. But significant correlation was found between CAS and the orbital uptake. Identifies active disease Lower cost. Greater availability. Higher energy so improved resolution. Shorter acquisition time Radiation. Invasive No
Gallium-67 scintigraphy γ-Ray scintigraphy Radiation Limited. Able to detect response to treatment Equivalent positive predictive value to octreotide and T2-relaxation time on MRI Invasive. Requires careful standardisation No, too difficult
FDG-PET/CT Positron scintigraphy Radiation Limited but able to identify activity even when MRI normal [27] May detect early/subclinical disease Radiation. Not widely used No
Thermal Heat None Limited. But higher temperatures recorded in TED Non-invasive. Changes in response to IV steroids [28] Low specificity. Requires complex equipment to measure accurately No, too much variability