Skip to main content
. 2018 Dec 10;100(2):323–326. doi: 10.4269/ajtmh.18-0611

Table 1.

Characteristics of case patients with calcified NCC and control subjects included in this study

Total series (n = 158) Case patients with NCC (n = 79) Control subjects (n = 79) Discordant pairs (n) Pairs with only NCC exposed Pairs with only control exposed Significance
Age, years (mean ± SD) 61.7 ± 12.3 61.5 ± 12.3 61.9 ± 12.2 Matched
Women, n (%) 106 (67) 53 (67) 53 (67) Matched
Primary school education, n (%) 85 (54) 44 (56) 41 (52) 19 11 8 OR: 1.38
95% CI: 0.50–3.94
P = 0.646
Recurrent seizures (epilepsy), n (%) 7 (4) 5 (6) 2 (3) 7 5 2 OR: 2.50
95% CI: 0.41–26.25
P = 0.449
Symptoms of depression, n (%) 19 (12) 9 (11) 10 (13) 15 7 8 OR: 0.88
95% CI: 0.27–2.76
P = 1.000
Hippocampal atrophy, n (%) 38 (24) 28 (35) 10 (13) 30 24 6 OR: 4.00
95% CI: 1.59–11.96
P = 0.002*

NCC = neurocysticercosis; OR = odds ratio; CI = confidence interval. Statistical significance of covariates across case patients and controls was calculated by the McNemar’s test for paired data (univariate analyses).

* Statistically significant result.