|
Acceptability
|
|
|
|
Objective: assessment of the extent to which BIT aligns with expectations of an agreeable user experience
Process: survey, interview, focus group, and direct observation usability testing
|
Mares et al (2016): qualitative methods used to assess initial consumer and provider expectations [33]
Milward et al (2017): focus groups assessed the extent to which features were acceptable in terms of content, features, and design [34]
|
|
Adoption
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Appropriateness
|
|
|
|
Objective: assessment of perceived BIT fit with the context
Process: survey, interview, focus group, direct observation usability testing, and workflow studies
|
|
|
Feasibility
|
|
|
|
Objective: in vivo assessment of the extent to which a BIT can be used by consumers or providers in a specific setting
Process: Passive data collection of BIT use, survey, and structured observation studies
|
|
|
Fidelity
|
|
|
|
Objective: measuring adherence, dose, or quality of BIT use with respect to the developer’s intentions for use
Process: passive data collection of BIT use
|
Calear et al (2013): reported high adherence associated with improved clinical outcomes in a hybrid implementation effectiveness study [7]
Sineath et al (2017): developed and tested a fidelity protocol for a diet and lifestyle monitoring BIT that involved coaching [38]
|
|
Implementation cost
|
|
|
|
Objective: intervention development costs, maintenance and versioning costs, implementation strategy costs, and operational costs
Process: cost analysis, interviews, and budgetary or administrative databases
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Penetration
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sustainability
|
|
|
Administrators
Organization
|
Objectives: measuring ongoing BIT use, change in funding streams, saturation within the organization, and inclusion in routine reports
Process: passive data collection of BIT use, administrative or budgetary databases, oversight committee reports, and policy and training documents
|
Carlfjord et al (2013): measured continued BIT delivery after active implementation [32]
Quanbeck et al (2018): measured whether or not the health system continued to offer BIT after research funding for an implementation trial ended [39]
|