Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2019 Apr 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Natl Cancer Inst. 2018 Apr 1;110(4):420–425. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djx218

Table 2.

Multivariable regression model assessing factors associated with a strong preference to preserve sexual function

Variable Adjusted Risk Ratios
(95% CI)
P-value
Age (years) 0.98 (0.97-0.99) <0.001
Baseline sexual function
 Normal vs. poor function 1.59 (1.39-1.82) <0.001
 Intermediate vs. poor function 1.39 (1.21-1.59) <0.001
Married vs. unmarried 0.89 (0.79-1.00) 0.06
Race (White vs. non-white) 0.77 (0.68-0.86) <0.001
NCCN risk group
 Intermediate vs. low 0.94 (0.84-1.04) 0.23
 High vs. low 0.84 (0.71-1.00) 0.06
Education
 High school or less vs. college graduate 1.22 (1.07-1.39) 0.01
 Some college vs. college graduate 0.96 (0.84-1.10) 0.59

Abbreviations: CI, Confidence Interval; NCCN, National Comprehensive Cancer Network