Skip to main content
. 2019 Feb 3;9(2):e026619. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-026619

Table 2.

Potential differences between Naughton et al 201613 and the repeat study

Naughton et al 201613 (stage one) Repeat study Considerations
No previous exposure to medicine authentication (MA) technology Previous exposure to MA technology Previous results have not identified an association between technology exposure and increased compliance. There was a greater than 1-year interval between the studies
Conducted as a service evaluation study Conducted as a research study The repeat study involved ethical approval and written consent
This study was proposed by the principal investigator This study was based on a consensus improvement (audio alarm) suggested by the participants Compliance may have been affected by the motivation to implement an idea that was suggested by the participants