Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2020 Feb 7.
Published in final edited form as: Cell Stem Cell. 2019 Jan 10;24(2):299–308.e6. doi: 10.1016/j.stem.2018.11.018

Figure 1. Differential rosi responsiveness and PPARγ genomic occupancy in patient-specific hASC-derived adipocytes.

Figure 1.

(A) Experimental design of derivation of patient adipocytes.

(B) Scheme of adipogenic differentiation procedure and rosi treatment.

(C) Heat map of patient-specific unresponsive genes that are not regulated by rosi in only one patient.

(D) Gene ontology for patient P1-specific unresponsive genes.

(E) mRNA expression of patient P1-specific unresponsive genes ANGPTL4 and AGPAT2 in adipocytes from five patients, normalized to HPRT, DMSO was set to 1, as measured by RT-qPCR.

(F) Heat map of patient-specific responsive genes that are significantly regulated by rosi in only one patient.

(G) Gene ontology for patient P3-specific responsive genes.

(H) mRNA expression of patient P3-specific responsive genes DGKQ and GUK1 in adipocytes from five patients, normalized to HPRT, DMSO was set to 1, as measured by RT-qPCR.

(I and J) Proportion (I) and Heat map (J) of patient-specific absent peaks that are specifically absent in only one patient, with at least 2-fold less reads in one patient compared to other four patients.

(K) For P1-specific absent peaks, the average binding profiles are shown in 1 kb windows across patients.

(L and M) Proportion (G) and Heat map (H) of patient-specific unique peaks that are specifically unique in only one patient, with at least 2-fold more reads in one patient compared to other four patients.

(N) For P3-specific unique peaks, the average binding profiles are shown in 1 kb windows across patients.

RT-qPCR data are expressed as mean ± SEM. (*) p < 0.05 in Student’s t-test. n = 3 per group.

See also Figure S1, S2 and S3.