Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2020 Mar 1.
Published in final edited form as: Diabetes Obes Metab. 2018 Dec 3;21(3):683–690. doi: 10.1111/dom.13572

Table 1:

BMI and hormonal changes after AGB or RYGB (Study 2 – First bariatric study)

Months after bariatric operation
Parameters OP 0 (a) 3 (b) 6 (c) P-value
BMI All 50.2 ± 10.6b,c 44.1 ± 8.2a 41.4 ± 8.5a <0.001
(kg/m2) AGB 49.1 ± 10.5b,c 43.3 ± 7.2a 42.8 ± 7.8a <0.001
RYGB 52.1 ± 11.8c 46.3 ± 12.3 38.8 ± 9.9a 0.002
Glucose All 88.0 (80.5, 112.5) 93.0 (80.0, 129.0) 87.5 (78.3, 113.8) 0.64
(mg/dl) AGB 88.0 (80.5, 110.5) 99.0 (85.5, 129.0) 102.0 (81.5, 126.5) 0.31
RYGB 98.5 (77.3, 131.8) 85.0 (77.0, 129.0) 73.0 (72.0, 90.5) 0.19
Insulin All 16.2 (10.8, 20.9) 12.8 (7.9, 23.3) 7.8 (3.7, 15.8) 0.07
(ulU/ml) AGB 15.1 (9.7, 19.8) 9.5 (7.5, 23.4) 7.9 (3.3, 17.9) 0.42
RYGB 25.6 (12.2, 41.1)c 16.2 (6.0, 21.3) 4.8 (3.8, 14.5)a 0.03
HOMA-IR All 2.58 (2.11, 5.13) 2.87 (1.32, 5.22) 1.64 (0.80, 4.98) 0.20
AGB 2.76 (1.91, 4.93) 2.35 (1.32, 5.72) 1.75 (0.95. 5.81) 0.73
RYGB 2.58 (2.47, 11.52) 2.99 (1.25, 3.68) 0.84 (0.73, 3.29) 0.07
HOMA-β All 218.8 (144.4, 367.4) 111.3 (66.5, 216.8) 110.3 (40.3, 193.0) 0.11
(%) AGB 188.1 (95.8, 342.6) 117.4 (77.1, 212.4) 47.4 (22.8, 167.7) 0.22
RYGB 311.4 (203.9, 427.3) 95.1 (34.6, 309.7) 184.7 (110.3, 279.5) 0.36
HbA1c All 6.00 (5.60,7.45) 6.10 (5.65, 7.10) 5.95 (5.43, 6.95) 0.31
(%) AGB 6.80 (5.60, 7.45) 6.35 (5.95, 7.23) 6.50 (5.60, 7.30 0.68
RYGB 5.95 (5.68, 7.20) 5.80 (5.30, 6.45) 5.50 (5.40, 6.50) 0.13
Follistatin All 4.97 ± 1.03 4.25 ± 1.19 4.70 ± 1.09 0.07
(ng/ml) AGB 4.94 ± 1.09 4.75 ± 1.22 4.92 ± 1.12 0.70
RYGB 5.03 ± 1.04b 3.37 ± 0.33a 4.19 ± 0.95 0.01
FSTL3 All 17.5 ± 6.1 16.1 ± 6.0 15.6 ± 5.4 0.14
(ng/ml) AGB 16.9 ± 5.9 16.9 ± 6.8 16.5 ± 5.9 0.81
RYGB 18.6 ± 7.2 14.6 ± 4.2 14.1 ± 4.5 0.04

Data are presented as mean ± SD if normally distributed and as median with first and third quartile if not normally distributed.

An intention-to treat analysis was performed. P-value corresponds to the p of paired one-way ANOVA.

§

By p-value<0.05, post-hoc Tukey’s test between groups were performed. Superscript letters (a,b,c) in the table indicate p<0.05 in post-hoc t-test between the subject group of the column in which the letters are written vs. the group indicated by the letter (a, b, or c). For example for BMI All at 0 months letters b,c indicate p<0.05 in post-hoc t-test for BMI when 0 months are compared with 3 months (b) or with 6 months (c).