Skip to main content
. 2019 Feb 8;10:662. doi: 10.1038/s41467-019-08607-1

Fig. 6.

Fig. 6

Central ablation of growth hormone receptor (GHR) prevents energy-saving adaptations during food restriction (F.R.) a Reduction in energy expenditure (VO2) during the days of F.R. compared to baseline (F.R. 1, F(2, 20) = 4.792, P = 0.0199; F.R. 2, F(2, 20) = 4.707, P = 0.0212; F.R. 3, F(2, 18) = 8.695, P = 0.0023; F.R. 4, F(2, 18) = 9.151, P = 0.0018; n = 5–10). b Body weight changes during F.R. (main effect of F.R. [F(7, 315) = 1011, P < 0.0001], main effect of GHR ablation [F(2, 45) = 2.258, P= 0.1163] and interaction [F(14, 315) = 3.189, P = 0.0001]; n = 14–20; *P < 0.05, LepR GHR KO vs. control mice; #P < 0.05, brain GHR knockout (KO) vs. control mice; Fisher's least significant difference (LSD) post-hoc test). c UCP-1 mRNA expression in the brown adipose tissue (BAT; main effect of F.R. [F(1, 32) = 1.374, P = 0.2499], main effect of GHR ablation [F(2, 32) = 3.646, P= 0.0652] and interaction [F(2, 32) = 5.547, P= 0.0248]) of LepR GHR KO mice. d Blood glucose changes during F.R. (main effect of time [F(7, 315) = 65.76, P < 0.0001], main effect of GHR ablation [F(2, 45) = 4.866, P = 0.0122] and interaction [F(14, 315) = 1.491, P= 0.1125]) and Fisher's LSD post-hoc test (*P < 0.05, LepR GHR KO vs. control mice; #P < 0.05, brain GHR KO vs. control mice; P < 0.05, LepR GHR KO vs. brain GHR KO mice; n = 14–15). e Food intake after intraperitoneal (i.p.) injection of either phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) or 2-deoxi-d-glucose (2DG; 0.5 mg/kg body weight (b.w.); n = 6–14). One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and the Newman–Keuls test were used when the data of control, LepR GHR KO and brain GHR KO mice were compared. The changes in body weight and glycemia or the effects of 2DG were analyzed by two-way ANOVA. All results were expressed as mean ± s.e.m.