Table 2.
RR | 95%CI | p-Value | |
---|---|---|---|
Basic modelsa | |||
High fruit & vegetable intake (≥6.7 servings/day) | 1.17 | 0.78, 1.78 | 0.45 |
High added sugar intake (≥39.9 tsp/day) | 1.13 | 0.75, 1.69 | 0.57 |
Food insecure | 0.75 | 0.62. 0.90 | <0.01 |
Physically active | 1.42 | 0.89, 2.28 | 0.14 |
Full modelsb | |||
High fruit & vegetable intake (≥6.7 servings/day) | 1.12 | 0.73, 1.72 | 0.60 |
High added sugar intake (≥39.9 tsp/day) | 1.18 | 0.78, 1.79 | 0.43 |
Food insecure | 0.76 | 0.63, 0.92 | <0.01 |
Physically active | 1.44 | 0.88, 2.33 | 0.14 |
Dietary variables estimated using the National Health Interview Survey (NHIS) 5-factor dietary screener (National Cancer Institute, n.d.), food insecurity assessed with 2-item screener focused on economic food insecurity (Hager et al., 2010), and physical activity assessed using the Lipid Research Clinics questionnaire (Ainsworth et al., 1993) where being ‘physically active’ defined as levels of high or moderate leisure time activity. Bold text in the table indicates statistically significant results.
Basic models are adjusted for age, gender, and neighborhood.
Full models adjusted for all variables in the basic model as well as comorbidity risk score derived from the Seattle Index of Comorbidity (Fan et al., 2002). Models reporting dietary outcomes were also adjusted for perceived easy transport to healthy food stores. Models reporting the physical activity outcome were also adjusted for perceived easy transport to recreation.