Skip to main content
. 2019 Feb 6;7(3):300–310. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v7.i3.300

Table 3.

Pearson’s chi-squared test comparison between the three study arms’ clinical and laboratory factors at 6 h

Control arm Arm 1 Arm 2 Chi-square P
Amylasemia at 6 h 4.288 0.368
< 3 × ULN 81.6% 100.0% 85.7%
> 3 × ULN 18.4% 0.0% 14.3%
Lipasemia at 6 h 10.046 0.040
< 3 × ULN 69.4% 68.7% 71.4%
> 3 × ULN 30.6% 31.3% 28.6%
CRP at 6 h 12.165 0.058
Normal 49.0% 56.2% 57.1%
Mild increase 20.4% 12.5% 35.7%
Moderate increase 26.5% 31.2% 0.0%
Severe increase 4.1% 0.0% 7.1%
Clinico-biologic status at 6 h 0.397 0.820
PEP absent 91.8% 87.5% 92.9%
PEP 8.2% 12.5% 7.1%

Arm 1: Study group A treatment regimen;

Arm 2: Study group B treatment regimen; CRP: C-reactive peptide; ULN: Upper limit of normal; PEP: Post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography pancreatitis.