Significance
The vacuole is one of the largest plant organelles. It occupies the basal region of the zygote and is mostly inherited in the basal daughter cell after zygotic division. In spite of the obvious asymmetry, how dynamically the vacuole is distributed and whether it contributes to apical–basal axis formation are unknown. In the present study, we report that the vacuole actively changes its shape and size and positions along actin filaments. We further show that vacuolar distribution supports nuclear localization at the opposite cell end, and thus ensures asymmetric division of the zygote. These results provide insights into cooperative organelle positioning during zygote polarization and the crucial roles of vacuoles in the initial steps of plant ontogeny.
Keywords: Arabidopsis thaliana, zygote, vacuole, apical–basal axis, live-cell imaging
Abstract
In most flowering plants, the asymmetric cell division of the zygote is the initial step in establishing the apical–basal axis of the mature plant. The zygote is polarized, possessing the nucleus at the apical tip and large vacuoles at the basal end. Despite their known polar localization, whether the positioning of the vacuoles and the nucleus is coordinated and what the role of the vacuole is in the asymmetric zygotic division remain elusive. In the present study, we utilized a live-cell imaging system to visualize the dynamics of vacuoles during the entire process of zygote polarization in Arabidopsis. Image analysis revealed that the vacuoles formed tubular strands around the apically migrating nucleus. They gradually accumulated at the basal region and filled the space, resulting in asymmetric distribution in the mature zygote. To assess the role of vacuoles in the zygote, we screened various vacuole mutants and identified that shoot gravitropism2 (sgr2), in which the vacuolar structural change was impaired, failed to form tubular vacuoles and to polarly distribute the vacuole. In sgr2, large vacuoles occupied the apical tip and thus nuclear migration was blocked, resulting in a more symmetric zygotic division. We further observed that tubular vacuole formation and asymmetric vacuolar distribution both depended on the longitudinal array of actin filaments. Overall, our results show that vacuolar dynamics is crucial not only for the polar distribution along actin filaments but also for adequate nuclear positioning, and consequently zygote-division asymmetry.
Initiation of the main body axis is an incipient event required for a unicellular zygote to develop into a multicellular organism. In most flowering plants (both monocots and dicots), the apical–basal axis is formed along the longitudinal axis of the zygote marked by the nucleus in the apical region and large vacuoles in the basal region (1, 2). Large vacuoles are also observed in unfertilized egg cells but, after fertilization, the vacuoles are shrunk and/or dispersed into the entire cell (3–5). In the mature zygote, vacuoles are accumulated at the basal region and most vacuoles are inherited in the basal cell after asymmetric division of the zygote (1, 4, 5). Despite such obvious changes, the dynamics of vacuolar distribution and the role of vacuoles in the asymmetric zygotic division are unknown.
We recently developed a high-resolution live-cell imaging system utilizing an in vitro ovule cultivation method and two-photon excitation microscopy, and visualized the intracellular dynamics in Arabidopsis zygotes (6, 7). Using this system, we observed that actin filaments (F-actin) align longitudinally in the elongating zygote and are essential for apically directed nuclear migration (6). However, it remained unknown whether other organelles also distribute along F-actin and, if so, whether their positioning is coordinated or independent.
In this study, we performed live-cell imaging of vacuolar dynamics during zygote polarization. Various morphological features of the vacuoles were extensively compared at different zygotic stages in the wild type and the shoot gravitropism2 (sgr2) mutant, which affects the vacuolar membrane protein, and after exposure to specific inhibitors for F-actin. We found that dynamic vacuolar distribution along F-actin is necessary for nuclear migration to the future division site. Our findings provide insights into the role of vacuoles in setting the accurate asymmetric division of the zygote in flowering plants.
Results
Vacuoles Form Thin Tubular Strands Around the Nucleus and Gradually Accumulate at the Basal Region During Zygote Elongation.
To perform live-cell imaging of the vacuole in the polarizing zygote, we developed a dual-color marker that simultaneously labels the vacuolar membrane and nucleus (vacuole/nucleus) and could be imaged using two-photon excitation microscopy (2PEM) (Fig. 1 A and B). We detected the same pattern of polar localization for the vacuole and the nucleus as the fixed ovules of nontransgenic plants (Fig. 1 and SI Appendix, Fig. S1) (5), thus indicating that our system visualized native intracellular patterns.
We then captured the behavior using time-lapse imaging until the first zygotic cell division (Fig. 1 B and C and Movie S1). Before fertilization, the egg cell showed a clear polar organization, with the nucleus at the apical pole and huge vacuoles occupying the basal region. After fertilization, the cell shrunk as we previously reported (6), and vacuolar size was also markedly reduced. The nucleus shifted to the cell center, and the vacuoles were detected both in the apical and basal regions (Fig. 1 D and E). Then, the zygote elongated, and the vacuoles formed thin tubular structures around the nucleus, which migrates toward the apical tip (Fig. 1 B–D). Simultaneously, vacuolar size was also gradually increased. The vacuoles in the apical region remained small while vacuolar size in the basal area was massively increased, resulting in a highly asymmetric distribution of the vacuoles on completion of nuclear migration and zygotic elongation (Fig. 1 B, C, and E). Therefore, after chromosome segregation and cytokinesis, most of the vacuoles were inherited into the basal cell.
In summary, fertilization triggers vacuolar shrinkage, and the vacuoles swell again during zygote elongation. The nucleus becomes surrounded by thin vacuolar tubules and migrates to the apical apex, while the vacuoles gradually accumulate at the basal region.
The sgr2-1 Mutant Is Defective in Asymmetrical Zygotic Division and Embryo Morphology.
To understand the role of vacuoles in zygote polarization, we examined whether the zygote-division asymmetry was affected when vacuolar morphology and/or functions were disturbed. Because zygotic vacuolar regulators were not identified, we observed various vacuole mutants that exhibited defects in other tissues (SI Appendix, Fig. S1A). We found that sgr2-1 zygotes divided in a more symmetrical manner (Fig. 2A and SI Appendix, Fig. S1A), as confirmed by the higher ratio of apical to basal daughter cell lengths than in the wild type (Fig. 2B). In contrast, the total lengths of one-cell-stage embryos were indistinguishable between the wild type and sgr2-1 (Fig. 2C), indicating that cell elongation was unaffected in the sgr2-1 zygote.
SGR2 (At1g31480) encodes a phospholipase A1-like protein localized on the vacuolar membrane (8, 9). Although the molecular function of SGR2 is still unknown, it has been reported that sgr2-1 severely impairs the dynamic shape changes of vacuoles and thus generates spherical and less mobile vacuoles in inflorescence stems (10). Therefore, the sedimentable plastids (amyloplasts) that are surrounded by the vacuolar membrane cannot smoothly reposition in response to gravitational forces, resulting in reduced gravitropism (10). We noticed that in the unfertilized egg cell of sgr2-1, the huge vacuole normally located at the basal end with the nucleus at the apical top, although the precise vacuolar shape could not be distinguished in the fixed samples (SI Appendix, Fig. S1B). Large vacuoles were detected in the sgr2-1 apical cell and also in the apical cell lineage (embryo proper) after zygotic division in all of the embryo stages examined, whereas only small vacuoles were detected in the wild type (Fig. 2 A and D and SI Appendix, Fig. S1 A and B). The sgr2-1 embryos showed distorted shapes with aberrant cell-division planes (Fig. 2D and SI Appendix, Fig. S1 A–C), and the sgr2-1 seedlings displayed morphological abnormalities such as the presence of three cotyledons (SI Appendix, Fig. S1D) (9). The sgr2-1 phenotypes in the zygote and embryo were restored by the SGR2 transgene (pSGR2::SGR2i-GFP), which complemented the gravitropic defects of sgr2-1 (Fig. 2 A–C and SI Appendix, Fig. S1A) (8). These findings indicated that SGR2 is required for proper vacuole distribution in the zygote, which would be important for zygote-division asymmetry and subsequent embryo development.
The sgr2-1 Mutant Fails to Form Tubular Vacuoles and Has Disturbed Polar Vacuole Distribution and Nuclear Migration.
We then performed time-lapse imaging of sgr2-1 (Fig. 3 and Movie S2). As observed in the fixed samples, the sgr2-1 egg cell polarly positioned the vacuole and the nucleus as in the wild type, although vacuoles were more spherical, as reported in inflorescence stems (Fig. 3A, compared with Fig. 1A and SI Appendix, Fig. S1B) (10). After fertilization, the sgr2-1 zygote showed cell shrinkage, nuclear localization at the cell center, and dispersed vacuoles both in the apical and basal regions. The indistinguishable vacuolar features between sgr2-1 and the wild type were confirmed by 3D reconstructed images (SI Appendix, Fig. S2A) and were also quantified by the similar values of circularity, perimeter, and area of the vacuole (Fig. 3 G–I), which were measured using a vacuolar lumen marker (SI Appendix, Fig. S2 B and C). However, during the zygotic elongation, sgr2-1 did not form a tubular vacuole, and only spherical and spotted vacuoles were observed in the perinuclear region, as shown by the larger value of circularity than in the wild type (Fig. 3G). In addition, the perimeter value in sgr2-1 was smaller than in the wild type (Fig. 3H), indicating reduced vacuolar surface. The apical and basal vacuoles both gradually increased in size (Fig. 3E), and finally vacuolar distribution became more symmetric than in the wild type (Fig. 3F). In contrast to the abnormal vacuole shape and distribution, the total vacuole area was indistinguishable between the wild type and sgr2-1 at all stages (Fig. 3 F and I), indicating that sgr2-1 specifically affected the vacuole morphology and polar vacuole positioning without altering vacuole size. This, together with the observation that the vacuolar lumen marker did not show spotted vacuoles in sgr2-1 (SI Appendix, Fig. S2A), suggested that SGR2 would be required to fuse small empty vacuoles with the large central vacuole, and thus to increase the vacuolar membrane component, not the vacuolar lumen volume.
The apical domain of the sgr2-1 zygote was occupied by large spherical vacuoles (Fig. 3E), which prevented the nucleus from reaching the apical cell end (Fig. 3D). Even when the zygote completed cell elongation, the nucleus still remained near the cell center (Fig. 3D). Therefore, the sgr2-1 zygote divided more symmetrically than that of the wild type, inheriting large vacuoles in the apical cell, which was consistent with the fixed-sample observations (Fig. 2 A and B and SI Appendix, Fig. S1 A and B). Despite the severe defect in cell-division asymmetry, cell-division timing was not affected in sgr2-1, as shown by the comparable time from the start of zygote elongation until the onset of nuclear division in the wild type (15 ± 5.6 h; n = 11) and in sgr2-1 (15 ± 3.3 h; n = 10) [not significant (P = 0.50) by Mann–Whitney U test]. These results showed that SGR2 is crucial for the dynamic vacuolar shape change and polar vacuolar distribution, which support accurate nuclear positioning and thus zygote-division asymmetry.
Because the vacuole is a fundamental organelle in plants, we then examined whether the vacuole-dependent mechanism to regulate zygotic asymmetry works in other tissues. As typical events involving cell polarization and/or asymmetric cell division, we focused on root hair initiation at the basal end of epidermal cells (SI Appendix, Fig. S3A) (11), nuclear positioning in the root hair (SI Appendix, Fig. S3 A and B) (12), cell-layer formation in the root meristem (SI Appendix, Fig. S3C) (13), and stomatal shape and patterning (SI Appendix, Fig. S3D) (14). Although SGR2 was expressed in whole seedlings (8) and the vacuole morphology was actually affected (SI Appendix, Fig. S3 A and C), we could not detect any defects in these processes in sgr2-1. These results suggested that the SGR2-dependent regulation of the asymmetric cell division is specific to the zygote.
Tubular Vacuole Formation and Polar Vacuole Distribution Depend on the Longitudinal Array of F-Actin.
To identify the driving force of polar vacuole positioning, we tested the involvement of F-actin, because it is known to associate with vacuolar membranes and regulate vacuolar morphology during various cellular events, such as cell-cycle progression in tobacco culture cells (15) and cell elongation in Arabidopsis roots (16). We have recently reported that in the Arabidopsis zygote, the F-actin array is disorganized upon fertilization and then gradually aligns longitudinally along the apical–basal axis (Fig. 4 A and B, SI Appendix, Fig. S4 A and B, and Movie S3) (6), implying an analogy to the temporal shrinkage and tubular formation of vacuoles. As in the wild type, F-actin in the sgr2-1 zygote was disorganized after fertilization and then gradually reorganized into parallel, dense, and thick bundles (SI Appendix, Fig. S4 C–G and Movie S4). Only the average angle of F-actin fibers (Δθ) was not reduced in the mature zygote of sgr2-1 (SI Appendix, Fig. S4H), indicating the less longitudinal alignment of F-actin cables in the whole cell. However, it seemed due to the large spherical vacuoles occupying the cell center in sgr2-1 (Fig. 4C). Indeed, the F-actin was excluded from the spherical vacuoles in sgr2-1 (Fig. 4G, a), whereas in the wild type the F-actin cable was detected in the basal vacuolar lumens, known as the transvacuolar strand. Moreover, the perinuclear F-actin was highly longitudinal and parallel both in the wild type and sgr2-1 (Fig. 4 B, D, and F). In the perinuclear region, F-actin cables were associated with tubular vacuoles in the wild type but not in sgr2-1 (Fig. 4G, b), showing that sgr2-1 fails to form tubular vacuoles along F-actin.
We then used the actin polymerization inhibitor, latrunculin B (LatB), which effectively destroyed the F-actin pattern observed in our zygote imaging system (6). After a 3-h LatB treatment, the tubular vacuoles disappeared from the perinuclear region (Fig. 4 H and I). A similar disappearance of the perinuclear vacuoles was caused by another actin polymerization inhibitor, cytochalasin D (CytD), which also disrupted the F-actin pattern in the zygote (SI Appendix, Fig. S4I). Moreover, after a 24-h LatB treatment, the zygote divided in a more symmetric manner, generating highly vacuolated apical cells as in sgr2-1 (Fig. 4 J and K). This LatB effect was not additive to sgr2-1 (Fig. 4K), implying that the F-actin–dependent nuclear positioning is mainly due to the polar vacuole distribution.
Discussion
Our study demonstrated that vacuoles dynamically change in size, morphology, and position after fertilization (Fig. 4L). We further identified that the vacuolar membrane protein SGR2 and the longitudinal F-actin array are both necessary for polar vacuole distribution, which in turn supports nuclear migration and thus zygote-division asymmetry. Our findings provide evidence not only for the coordinated polar positioning of the vacuole and nucleus at opposite cell ends but also for the crucial role of the vacuole in cellular asymmetry in plant development.
After temporal shrinkage upon fertilization, the vacuole swells again, probably to help rapid zygote elongation without massive production of cytosol, as observed in other expanding cells (17). Zygote elongation was not affected in sgr2-1, which showed proper vacuole size changes, but vacuole positioning was severely impaired. These results indicate different genetic requirements for the vacuole volume change and the polar vacuole distribution. Polar vacuole distribution would be specific for particular aspects, such as zygote polarization and gravity sensing, in which dynamic vacuolar shape change and coordinated organelle positioning occur synchronously (18). This specificity is supported by the observations that sgr2-1 did not affect asymmetric cell division in roots and stomata, and various vacuole mutants did not disturb zygote-division asymmetry. Furthermore, the roles of F-actin in the zygote and other elongating cells might also be different, because F-actin regulates vacuole occupancy for root cell growth and thus LatB treatment inhibits root elongation (16), whereas in the zygote, LatB rarely impairs zygote elongation (6) but severely blocks polar vacuole distribution.
We also showed that in sgr2-1, nuclear migration was blocked by the large vacuoles occupying the apical region. Therefore, proper vacuole distribution is necessary for the nucleus to reach the appropriate apical site, probably via making free apical space for the nucleus (Fig. 4L). Their cooperative positioning is required not only for accurate asymmetrical zygotic division but also for the unequal inheritance of the vacuole into two daughter cells. This would ensure proper embryo development, possibly by generating a cytoplasmic apical cell to produce the highly proliferating embryo proper and a vacuolated basal cell to produce the rapidly elongating extraembryonic suspensor (Fig. 4L). Indeed, excess vacuoles in the embryo proper cause distorted embryo shape in the sgr8/gravitropism defective2 mutant (19), and reduced vacuoles in the suspensor also disturb embryo patterning in vacuoleless (20).
To explain the mechanism underlying polar vacuole distribution in the zygote, the simple hypotheses would be predominant vacuole biogenesis at the basal region and/or directional vacuole migration along F-actin. Although the latter idea would be supported by the observation of tubular vacuoles associating with F-actin, our current knowledge of vacuole dynamics is too poor to determine the mechanism (17). Therefore, future investigations like live imaging of various vesicle trafficking routes for vacuole biogenesis, such as the adaptor protein complex 3-mediated pathway (17, 21), and the identification of the factors that link vacuoles to F-actin, such as myosin motor proteins (22), are warranted. These findings would also help to understand how SGR2 contributes to polar vacuole distribution. The sgr2-1 zygote harbored many spotted vacuoles and reduced the vacuolar perimeter, suggesting that SGR2 is required to fuse small vacuoles with the large central vacuole, thereby increasing the amount of vacuolar membrane. It is easy to imagine that the abundant vacuolar surface is necessary for flexible shape change, and thus insufficient vacuolar membrane would cause rigid and spherical vacuoles as found in sgr2-1. This, taken together with the fact that SGR2 encodes a phospholipase A1-like protein localized on the vacuolar membrane (8), shows SGR2 might be important to degrade and/or produce some specific phospholipids, which regulate vacuolar membrane fusion. Previous studies have shown that vacuolar organization is controlled by various phospholipids, such as phosphatidylinositol 3,5-bisphosphate and phosphatidylinositol 3-phosphate (PI3P) (23–25). In particular, pharmacological depletion of PI3P rescues the vacuolar defects of the vesicle transport through interaction with t-snares11 (vti11) mutant of vacuolar/PVC Qb-SNARE, which regulates vacuolar membrane fusion (26–28), showing the negative effect of PI3P on vacuolar fusion. Mutants in vti11 produce spherical vacuoles and show impaired gravitropic response (9, 29), implying an analogy to sgr2-1. Therefore, SGR2 might similarly contribute to increasing vacuolar surface and thus indirectly assist flexible vacuolar shape change along F-actin. However, we cannot exclude the possibility that SGR2 supports the interaction of the vacuole and F-actin in a more direct manner, because several phospholipids are known to bind to F-actin–associating factors, such as myosin and actin-binding proteins in animal cells (30, 31). Future studies, such as the identification of enzymatic targets of SGR2 and live imaging of various phospholipids during zygote polarization (32), will demonstrate how SGR2 regulates vacuolar dynamics in the zygote.
Materials and Methods
Detailed materials and methods are described in SI Appendix.
Strains and Growth Conditions.
All Arabidopsis lines were in the Columbia (Col-0) background, and sgr2-1 has been described previously (9). The complemented sgr2-1 by pSGR2::SGR2i-GFP was described previously (8). Plants were grown at 18 to 22 °C under continuous light or long-day conditions (16-h light/8-h dark).
Plasmid Construction.
The vacuolar marker for the egg cell and the zygote was EC1p::VHP1-mGFP, consisting of the EGG CELL1 (EC1) promoter (33), monomeric GFP (mGFP), and VACUOLAR H+-PPASE (VHP1) (34). The vacuolar lumen marker was EC1p::SP-mTur2-CTPP, containing the signal peptide (SP), mTurquoise2 (mTur2), and the vacuolar sorting signal COOH-terminal propeptide (CTPP) (35). Details of cloning procedures are shown in SI Appendix.
Zygote Imaging and Inhibitor Treatment.
In vitro ovule culturing and 2PEM live-cell imaging were performed as previously described (6, 7). For the inhibitor treatment, 0.1% DMSO and 1 μM LatB (Sigma) and 100 μM CytD (Sigma) dissolved in 0.1% DMSO were added to the ovule cultivation media as previously described (6). An AxioImager A2 (Zeiss) was used for differential interference contrast (DIC) microscopy.
Quantitative Analysis of Vacuoles and F-Actin Structures.
Image processing and measurements of lengths and vacuolar areas were performed using the binarized maximum-intensity projection images of vacuolar/nuclear markers with ImageJ software (https://imagej.nih.gov/ij/index.html). ImageJ was also used to quantify the circularity, perimeter, and area of the vacuolar lumen marker. The quantification of F-actin pattern was performed as previously described (6).
Supplementary Material
Acknowledgments
We thank Hanae Tsuchiya, Yumi Kuwabara, and Yuriko Toda for technical support; Daisuke Maruyama for providing the vacuolar lumen reporter; and Kazuo Ebine and Takashi Ueda for providing the sand-2 mutant. This work was supported by the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science: Grant-in-Aid for JSPS Research Fellow (JP18J10512 to Y.K.), Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research on Innovative Areas [JP15H05962, JP15H05955, and JP17H05838 to M.U.; JP16H06465, JP16H06464, and JP16K21727 to T. Higashiyama; JP24114007 to S.H.; JP16H01235 to M.M.; and JP16H06280 (Advanced Bioimaging Support)], Grants-in-Aid for Young Scientists (A, JP25711017 to T. Higaki; and B, JP16K18687 to S.S.), Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research (B, JP16H04802 to S.H.; JP17H03697 to D.K.; and A, JP26252011 to M.M.), Grants-in-Aid for Challenging Exploratory Research (JP16K14753 to M.U.; and JP17K19380 to T. Higaki), Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research on Priority Areas (JP16085205 to M.T.M.), and PRESTO Project, Japan Science and Technology Agency (M.T.M.).
Footnotes
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
This article is a PNAS Direct Submission.
This article contains supporting information online at www.pnas.org/lookup/suppl/doi:10.1073/pnas.1814160116/-/DCSupplemental.
References
- 1.Mansfield SG, Briarty LG. Early embryogenesis in Arabidopsis thaliana. II. The developing embryo. Can J Bot. 1991;69:461–476. [Google Scholar]
- 2.Suzuki K, Taniguchi T, Maeda E. Ultrastructure and cleavage pattern of rice proembryos. Jpn J Sci. 1992;61:292–303. [Google Scholar]
- 3.Faure JE, Rotman N, Fortuné P, Dumas C. Fertilization in Arabidopsis thaliana wild type: Developmental stages and time course. Plant J. 2002;30:481–488. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-313x.2002.01305.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Jensen WA. Cotton embryogenesis: The zygote. Planta. 1968;79:346–366. doi: 10.1007/BF00386917. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Ueda M, Zhang Z, Laux T. Transcriptional activation of Arabidopsis axis patterning genes WOX8/9 links zygote polarity to embryo development. Dev Cell. 2011;20:264–270. doi: 10.1016/j.devcel.2011.01.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Kimata Y, et al. Cytoskeleton dynamics control the first asymmetric cell division in Arabidopsis zygote. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2016;113:14157–14162. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1613979113. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Kurihara D, Kimata Y, Higashiyama T, Ueda M. In vitro ovule cultivation for live-cell imaging of zygote polarization and embryo patterning in Arabidopsis thaliana. J Vis Exp. 2017 doi: 10.3791/55975. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Morita MT, et al. Involvement of the vacuoles of the endodermis in the early process of shoot gravitropism in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell. 2002;14:47–56. doi: 10.1105/tpc.010216. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Kato T, et al. SGR2, a phospholipase-like protein, and ZIG/SGR4, a SNARE, are involved in the shoot gravitropism of Arabidopsis. Plant Cell. 2002;14:33–46. doi: 10.1105/tpc.010215. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Toyota M, et al. Amyloplast displacement is necessary for gravisensing in Arabidopsis shoots as revealed by a centrifuge microscope. Plant J. 2013;76:648–660. doi: 10.1111/tpj.12324. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Fischer U, Ikeda Y, Grebe M. Planar polarity of root hair positioning in Arabidopsis. Biochem Soc Trans. 2007;35:149–151. doi: 10.1042/BST0350149. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Chytilova E, et al. Nuclear dynamics in Arabidopsis thaliana. Mol Biol Cell. 2000;11:2733–2741. doi: 10.1091/mbc.11.8.2733. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Van Norman JM. Asymmetry and cell polarity in root development. Dev Biol. 2016;419:165–174. doi: 10.1016/j.ydbio.2016.07.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Facette MR, Smith LG. Division polarity in developing stomata. Curr Opin Plant Biol. 2012;15:585–592. doi: 10.1016/j.pbi.2012.09.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Higaki T, Kutsuna N, Okubo E, Sano T, Hasezawa S. Actin microfilaments regulate vacuolar structures and dynamics: Dual observation of actin microfilaments and vacuolar membrane in living tobacco BY-2 cells. Plant Cell Physiol. 2006;47:839–852. doi: 10.1093/pcp/pcj056. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Scheuring D, et al. Actin-dependent vacuolar occupancy of the cell determines auxin-induced growth repression. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2016;113:452–457. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1517445113. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Krüger F, Schumacher K. Pumping up the volume—Vacuole biogenesis in Arabidopsis thaliana. Semin Cell Dev Biol. 2018;80:106–112. doi: 10.1016/j.semcdb.2017.07.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Singh M, Gupta A, Laxmi A. Striking the right chord: Signaling enigma during root gravitropism. Front Plant Sci. 2017;8:1304. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2017.01304. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Silady RA, et al. The GRV2/RME-8 protein of Arabidopsis functions in the late endocytic pathway and is required for vacuolar membrane flow. Plant J. 2008;53:29–41. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-313X.2007.03314.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Rojo E, Gillmor CS, Kovaleva V, Somerville CR, Raikhel NV. VACUOLELESS1 is an essential gene required for vacuole formation and morphogenesis in Arabidopsis. Dev Cell. 2001;1:303–310. doi: 10.1016/s1534-5807(01)00024-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Feraru E, et al. The AP-3 β adaptin mediates the biogenesis and function of lytic vacuoles in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell. 2010;22:2812–2824. doi: 10.1105/tpc.110.075424. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Avisar D, et al. A comparative study of the involvement of 17 Arabidopsis myosin family members on the motility of Golgi and other organelles. Plant Physiol. 2009;150:700–709. doi: 10.1104/pp.109.136853. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Whitley P, Hinz S, Doughty J. Arabidopsis FAB1/PIKfyve proteins are essential for development of viable pollen. Plant Physiol. 2009;151:1812–1822. doi: 10.1104/pp.109.146159. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Nováková P, et al. SAC phosphoinositide phosphatases at the tonoplast mediate vacuolar function in Arabidopsis. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2014;111:2818–2823. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1324264111. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Lee Y, et al. The Arabidopsis phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase is important for pollen development. Plant Physiol. 2008;147:1886–1897. doi: 10.1104/pp.108.121590. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Ebine K, et al. Plant vacuolar trafficking occurs through distinctly regulated pathways. Curr Biol. 2014;24:1375–1382. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2014.05.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Sanderfoot AA, Kovaleva V, Bassham DC, Raikhel NV. Interactions between syntaxins identify at least five SNARE complexes within the Golgi/prevacuolar system of the Arabidopsis cell. Mol Biol Cell. 2001;12:3733–3743. doi: 10.1091/mbc.12.12.3733. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Zheng J, Han SW, Rodriguez-Welsh MF, Rojas-Pierce M. Homotypic vacuole fusion requires VTI11 and is regulated by phosphoinositides. Mol Plant. 2014;7:1026–1040. doi: 10.1093/mp/ssu019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Saito C, et al. The occurrence of ‘bulbs’, a complex configuration of the vacuolar membrane, is affected by mutations of vacuolar SNARE and phospholipase in Arabidopsis. Plant J. 2011;68:64–73. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-313X.2011.04665.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Senju Y, et al. Mechanistic principles underlying regulation of the actin cytoskeleton by phosphoinositides. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2017;114:E8977–E8986. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1705032114. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Liu X, et al. Mammalian nonmuscle myosin II binds to anionic phospholipids with concomitant dissociation of the regulatory light chain. J Biol Chem. 2016;291:24828–24837. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M116.739185. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Simon ML, et al. A multi-colour/multi-affinity marker set to visualize phosphoinositide dynamics in Arabidopsis. Plant J. 2014;77:322–337. doi: 10.1111/tpj.12358. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Sprunck S, et al. Egg cell-secreted EC1 triggers sperm cell activation during double fertilization. Science. 2012;338:1093–1097. doi: 10.1126/science.1223944. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Segami S, Makino S, Miyake A, Asaoka M, Maeshima M. Dynamics of vacuoles and H+-pyrophosphatase visualized by monomeric green fluorescent protein in Arabidopsis: Artifactual bulbs and native intravacuolar spherical structures. Plant Cell. 2014;26:3416–3434. doi: 10.1105/tpc.114.127571. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Vitale A, Raikhel NV. What do proteins need to reach different vacuoles? Trends Plant Sci. 1999;4:149–155. doi: 10.1016/s1360-1385(99)01389-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.