Skip to main content
. 2018 Oct 12;269(3):432–442. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000003075

TABLE 3.

Overview and Diagnostic Accuracy Sorted by Type of Procedure

SLNB
Author Identification Rate Sampling SLNs, Median (range) Ax-pCR %* TP FP FN TN FNR % (CI) NPV % (CI)
Alvarado 92.7 Tc and/or blue 2 (1–7) 35 57 0 15 39 21 (12–32) 72 (58–84)
Boileau 87.6 Tc and/or blue 2.7 (mean) 35 76 0 7 44 8 (3–17) 86 (74–94)
Boughey 92.7 Tc and/or blue NR 40.0 326 0 56 255 15 (11–19) 82 (77–86)
Brown NR Tc and/or blue 2 (1–10) 30.2 47 0 13 26 22 (12–34) 67 (50–81)
Carrera 90.5 Single radioactive 2.2 (mean) (1–6) 35.4 28 0 3 17 10 (2–26) 85 (62–97)
Enokido 90.9 Tc and/or blue 1.6 (mean) 52 49 0 13 68 21 (12–33) 84 (74–91)
Ge 84.3 Tc and/or blue 2.4 (1–7) 27.9 25 0 6 12 19 (7–37) 67 (41–87)
Kang 87.9 Tc and/or blue 2.8 (mean) (1–8) 28.8 34 0 7 17 17 (7–32) 71 (49–87)
Kuehn 82.6 Tc ± blue NR 48.8 51 0 12 60 19 (10–31) 83 (73–91)
Ozmen 92.2 Tc + blue 2.1 (1–5) 28 44 0 7 20 14 (6–26) 74 (54–89)
Park 94.9 Single, radioactive 2,1 (mean) (1–12) 40.8 78 0 22 69 22 (14–31) 76 (66–84)
Pinero-Madrona 84.0 Tc ± blue NR 34.2 15 0 10 13 40 (21–61) 57 (34–77)
Shen 92.8 Tc and/or blue 2 (1–10) 28.6 30 0 10 16 25 (13–41) 62 (41–80)
Thomas 86.7 Single blue 1,57 (mean) (1–4) 31 15 0 3 8 17 (4–41) 73 (39–94)
Yagata 85.3 Tc + blue 2 (1–7) 37 43 0 8 30 16 (7–29) 79 (63–90)
Yu 95.8 Single: Blue 1,48 (mean) (1–4) 52.2 14 0 8 24 36 (17–59) 75 (57–89)
Zetterlund 77.9 Tc and/or Blue 2 (1–5) 39.5 79 0 13 60 14 (8–23) 82 (71–90)
ML
Author IFR % Pre-NST Marker Post-NST Marker N Lymph Nodes Ax-pCR %* TP FP FN TN FNR % (CI) NPV % (CI)
Donker 97 Iodine seed NA 1 26 65 0 5 25 7 (2 – 16) 83 (65–94)
Combination
Author IFR % Sampling SLNB Pre-NST Marker Post-NST Marker N Lymph Nodes Ax-pCR %* ML is SLN % TP FP FN TN FNR% (CI) NPV% (CI)
Caudle 100% Tc and/or blue Clip Iodine seed NR 41 77 49 0 1 35 2 (0–11) 97 (85–1)
Siso NR Tc and/or blue Clip NA* 3 median 31.7 77 23 0 1 11 4 (0–21) 92 (62–1)

NA indicates not applicable; NR, not reported; Tc, technetium.

*Ax-pCR rate based on data of 2 × 2 contingency tables.

Rate is based on 134 patients with a clipped node that underwent SLNB (it was documented if the clipped node was identified as an SLN). Eighty-five patients actually underwent TAD followed by cALND.