Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2019 Feb 11.
Published in final edited form as: Lancet Glob Health. 2019 Feb;7(2):e200–e208. doi: 10.1016/S2214-109X(18)30436-4

Table 3:

Clinical and economic outcomes, including cost-effectiveness, of tuberculosis screening strategies among hospitalised people with HIV

Mortality
Lifetime outcomes
2 months 2 years 5 years Life-years (undiscounted) Life-years (discounted)* Cost (US$; discounted)* ICER (US$/YLS; discounted)
Intervention in all patients (sputum Xpert, urine TB-LAM, and concentrated urine Xpert)
Malawi
 Standard of care 24·4% 40·7% 50·5% 12·5 8·4 3450 ··
 Intervention 20·9% 35·2% 45·8% 13·7 9·1 3790 450
South Africa
 Standard of care 17·7% 32·0% 42·4% 14·1 9·5 8500 ··
 Intervention 15·5% 29·6% 40·4% 14·6 9·8 8770 840
Intervention in patients with CD4 counts <100 cells per μL (sputum Xpert, urine TB-LAM, and concentrated urine Xpert)
Malawi
 Standard of care 40·5% 65·2% 75·6% 6·3 4·3 2090 ··
 Intervention 33·7% 58·5% 70·6% 7·6 5·2 2500 490
South Africa
 Standard of care 32·2% 55·9% 67·8% 8·2 5·6 6920 ··
 Intervention 23·9% 50·2% 63·7% 9·2 6·3 7630 1000
Modified intervention in all patients (sputum Xpert and urine TB-LAM)
Malawi
 Standard of care 24·4% 40·7% 50·5% 12·5 8·4 3450 ··
 Modified intervention 21·1% 35·5% 46·0% 13·6 9·1 3750 420
South Africa
 Standard of care 17·7% 32·0% 42·4% 14·1 9·5 8500 ··
 Modified intervention 16·0% 30·2% 41·0% 14·5 9·7 8690 810
Intervention vs modified intervention in all patients
Malawi
 Modified intervention 21·1% 35·5% 46·0% 13·6 9·1 3750 ··
 Intervention 20·9% 35·2% 45·8% 13·7 9·1 3790 910
South Africa
 Modified intervention 16·0% 30·2% 41·0% 14·5 9·7 8690 ··
 Intervention 15·5% 29·6% 40·4% 14·6 9·8 8770 930

Values are calculated in 2017 US$. ICER=incremental cost-effectiveness ratio. YLS=year of life saved. Xpert=GeneXpert assay for Mycobacterium tuberculosis and rifampicin resistance. TB-LAM=lateral flow urine assay for M tuberculosis lipoarabinomannan.

*

Discounted 3% per year.

Cost includes all health-care expenditures.

The ICER is the difference between the intervention and standard of care or between the modified intervention and standard of care in discounted costs divided by the difference in discounted life-years. The displayed life-years and costs are rounded, but the ICER was calculated with non-rounded life-years and costs. We considered the intervention or the modified intervention to be cost-effective if its ICER was less than the cost-effectiveness thresholds of $750/YLS in Malawi and $940/YLS in South Africa (the ICERs of including second-line antiretroviral therapy in these countries).