Skip to main content
. 2019 Feb 11;14(2):e0211837. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0211837

Table 2. Comparison in conventional sperm parameters before and after semen processing in the different studied groups.


Sperm parameters
Concentration
(x106/ml)
Motility (%)
Dead cells (%) Normal morphology (%)
Progressive Non-progressive Non motile
Raw semen Lean 54(45) 35(7.45) 30(7.7) 35(16.25) 22.42(18) 10(0)
Overweight 30(24.5)*** 22.5(10)*** 30(15) 48.85(20)*** 27.05(19.62) 6(9.25)**
Obese 37.5(36.25)** 22.5(5.87)*** 25(10) 50(21.25) 27(21.25) 4(2)***
Density gradient technique Lean 50 (45) 70(45) 15(20) 10(17.5) 10.5(14.75) 11(8.**)
Overweight 20 (30) *** 71.8(47.5) 10(18.75) 16(28.75) 14.75(28.97) 3(7)**
Obese 27.5 (38) ** 64(35.75) 20(18.75) 12.5(21.37) 18(20.125) 4.5(6.25)***
Swim-up technique Lean 30 (23.5) 90(18) 7.5(11.25) 5(10) 7.25(6.8) 10(7)
Overweight 10 (17) ** 80(50) 10(30) 0(10) 5.75(9.57) 7(11.5)
Obese 12.5 (23.25) ** 80(45.35) 13.75(47.5) 0(10) 4.5(7.79) 5(4)

Results are expressed as median (interquartile range) for non-normally distributed continuous variables. Superscripts

** (p<0.01) and

*** (p<0.001) stand for statistically significant differences between overweight/obese men and lean men in each group.