Skip to main content
. 2019 Feb 1;8:135–144. doi: 10.1016/j.ijppaw.2019.01.007

Table 2.

Analysis of parasite size and reproductive parameters according to parasite species, fish species, their interaction, population, and, for parasite size, Pomphorhynchus load (the number of parasites per individual fish) and sex, and for reproductive parameters parasite size (a) Parasite size, and male testes volume; (b) female reproductive parameters, represented by the two first PCA axis (main contributing variable provided; see Fig. S3b). Infection type refers to monospecific or heterospecific infection with respect to Pomphorhynchus species.

(a)
Dependant variable Predictor variable Parasite size Chi2 (df; P value) Testes Chi2 (df; P value)
Parasite load 0.8 (1; P = 0.37)
Parasite sex 24.1 (1; P < 0.0001) /
Parasite size / 137.8 (1; P < 0.0001)
Fish sp. P.laevis: 8.67 (1; P = 0.003)P. tereticollis: 2.69 (1; P = 0.10) 5.3 (2; P = 0.07)
Parasite sp. in barbel: 44.5 (1; P < 0.0001)in chub: 0.09 (1; P = 0.76) 1.5 (2; P = 0.47)
Fish * Parasite sp. 34.8 (1; P < 0.0001) 0.02 (1; P = 0.87)
Infection type $ 2.01 (1; 0.15) /
Population
1.6 (1; P = 0.20)
0.4 (1; P = 0.63)

(b)

Dependant variable Predictor variable PC 1 ∼ nb eggs, prop.egg3
Chi2 (df; P value)
PC2∼ nb ovarian balls
Chi2 (df; P value)

Parasite size 43.4 (1; P < 0.0001) 0.72 (1; P = 0.39)
P. laevis in chub vs
P. tereticollis in barbel
21.3 (1; P < 0.0001) 4.33 (1; P = 0.04)
Population 0.1 (1; P = 0.31) 3.53 (1; P = 0.06)

Significant values are indicated in bold.