Skip to main content
. 2019 Feb 5;10:32. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2019.00032

Table 3.

Comparison of directions of effects of cytonuclear interacting combinations significant both in the dormancy and germination performance experiments.

Comparisona Number of shared significant cytonuclear interacting combinations Number of identical direction of effectsb Number of opposite directions of effectsc
Gmax vs. 0PH 49 36 13
Gmax vs. 3PH 59 45 14
Gmax vs. 6PH 37 20 17
Gmax vs. 9PH 43 30 13

aGmax stands for germination success in the experiment testing germination performance; xPH stands for germination success after × months PH in the dormancy experiment. bIdentical directions of significant effects (listed in Supplementary Table S4) correspond to identical signs of contrasts calculated as described in Supplementary Methods S1. Based on the writing of the contrasts, it indicates that the considered cytonuclear interacting combination affected germination success in the same direction in both experiments, thus dormancy and germination performance in opposite directions. cOn the same basis, opposite directions of the effects correspond to opposite signs of the contrast results. It indicates that the considered cytonuclear interacting combination affected germination success in opposite directions in both experiments, thus dormancy and germination performance in the same direction.