Table 2.
Genus | Variety | Location | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
df | F | P | df | F | P | |
Curtobacterium | 8 | 0.3 | 0.9710 | 14 | 1.1 | 0.3260 |
Deinococcus | 8 | 1.8 | 0.0944 | 14 | 1.3 | 0.2386 |
Hymenobacter | 8 | 0.5 | 0.8730 | 14 | 1.1 | 0.3900 |
Kineococcus | 8 | 0.7 | 0.6710 | 14 | 0.6 | 0.8970 |
Methylobacterium | 8 | 1.7 | 0.0986 | 14 | 2.0 | 0.0229 |
Pseudomonas | 8 | 1.7 | 0.1060 | 14 | 0.6 | 0.8490 |
Sphingomonas | 8 | 2.0 | 0.0538 | 14 | 3.2 | 0.0004 |
Spirosoma | 8 | 1.0 | 0.4230 | 14 | 1.0 | 0.4310 |
For each prokaryote genus, an ANOVA model of the mean proportion of sequencing reads was constructed by including the rootstock varieties of host tomato and spatial positions in the field (location; Fig. 1A) as explanatory variables. Genera that occurred in 30 or more tomato individuals were subjected to the analysis.