Skip to main content
. 2019 Jan 29;5(1):e10906. doi: 10.2196/10906

Table 1.

District selection in Ho Chi Minh City for female sex workers.

District (A) EPPa provincial estimate distributed across districts with public security proportion (B), n Reported FSWsb by public security 2014 (C), n Contribution of each district to EPP estimate (column B) (D), % Cumulative (E), % District selected (F)
Binh Thanh 3245 1139 16.22 16.22 Yes
Cu Chi 1419 498 7.09 23.32 No
District 1 1410 495 7.05 30.37 No
Go Vap 1367 480 6.84 37.20 No
Phu Nhuan 1191 418 5.95 43.16 Yes
Binh Tan 1111 390 5.55 48.71 No
Tan Phu 1014 356 5.07 53.78 No
District 10 903 317 4.52 58.30 No
Tan Binh 863 303 4.32 62.61 No
District 9 806 283 4.03 66.64 Yes
Binh Chanh 781 274 3.90 70.55 Yes
District 3 772 271 3.86 74.41 No
Hoc Mon 735 258 3.67 78.08 No
District 11 695 244 3.48 81.56 No
District 5 615 216 3.08 84.63 No
District 7 493 173 2.46 87.10 Yes
District 6 433 152 2.16 89.26 No
Nha Be 393 138 1.97 91.23 No
District 8 393 138 1.97 93.19 No
Thu Duc 345 121 1.72 94.92 No
District 12 319 112 1.60 96.51 No
District 2 251 88 1.25 97.76 No
District 4 234 82 1.17 98.93 Yes
Can Gio 214 75 1.07 100.00 No
Total 20,002 7021 100.00 6 districts

aEPP: Estimation and Project Package.

bFSWs: female sex workers.