Skip to main content
. 2019 Feb 12;18:49. doi: 10.1186/s12944-019-0987-6

Table 2.

Regression slopes for lipid-related indices (dependent variables) vs. BMI and waist circumference (independent variables) adjusted for age, gender, smoking and drinking, stratified by physical activity

Physical activity Dependent variable
TC (mmol/L) TG (mmol/L) HDL-C (mmol/L) LDL-C (mmol/L)
Independent variable: BMI (kg/m2)
Non-diabetic
  Active 0.0159 ± 0.0035*** 0.0798 ± 0.0045*** − 0.0311 ± 0.0011*** 0.0215 ± 0.0030***
  Inactive 0.0191 ± 0.0032*** 0.0869 ± 0.0047*** − 0.0304 ± 0.0010*** 0.0232 ± 0.0027***
  Interaction (P)a P = 0.0025 P < 0.0001 P = 0.9067 P = 0.0294
Diabetic
  Active 0.0742 ± 0.0177*** − 0.0150 ± 0.0032***
  Inactive 0.0762 ± 0.0216*** − 0.0158 ± 0.0029***
  Interaction (P) P = 0.0204 P = 0.9636
Independent variable: WC (cm)
Non-diabetic
  Active 0.0071 ± 0.0013*** 0.0299 ± 0.0015*** − 0.0114 ± 0.0004*** 0.0090 ± 0.0012***
  Inactive 0.0088 ± 0.0012*** 0.0328 ± 0.0018*** − 0.0107 ± 0.0004*** 0.0086 ± 0.0009***
  Interaction (P) P = 0.0055 P = 0.0011 P = 0.5942 P = 0.0688
Diabetic
  Active 0.0224 ± 0.0062*** − 0.0050 ± 0.0012***
  Inactive 0.0263 ± 0.0080*** − 0.0054 ± 0.0011***
  Interaction (P) P = 0.0233 P = 0.9876

Regression coefficient ± standard error

BMI, body mass index; WC, waist circumference; TC, total cholesterol; TG, triglyceride; HDL-C, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol; LDL-C, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol

aThe test for whether physical activity affected the relationship of lipid-related indices to BMI

***P < 0.001