Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2019 Feb 12.
Published in final edited form as: Environ Int. 2018 Nov 29;123:104–113. doi: 10.1016/j.envint.2018.11.049

Table 2.

Associations of sex and smoking status with relative abundance of selected genera.

Taxonomy βa (95% CI; relative
abundance, %)
P-value Adjusted P-
valueb
Sex
 Genus Oscillospira 0.13 (0.05, 0.20) 0.0007 0.04
 Genus Desulfovibrio 0.06 (0.02, 0.10) 0.004 0.11
 Genus Prevotella −6.8 (−12.5, −1.2) 0.02 0.33
Smoking
 Genus Catenibacterium 0.58 (0.14, 1.02) 0.01 0.21
 Genus Slackia 0.01 (< 0.01, 0.02) 0.01 0.21
 Genus Collinsella 0.25 (0.06, 0.44) 0.01 0.21
 Genus Dialister 0.70 (0.05, 1.34) 0.03 0.35
 Genus [Eubacterium] 0.28 (0.01, 0.56) 0.05 0.35
 Genus Peptococcus 0.01 (< 0.01, 0.03) 0.05 0.35
a

Coefficient from linear regression model indicates difference in relative abundance of genera in women relative to men and in ever smokers relative to never smokers, adjusting for sex, age, BMI, smoking, and education (sex or smoking was not adjusted for in its respective main analyses).

b

P values were corrected for multiple testing using the Benjamini-Hochberg procedure to control false discovery rate (FDR) ≤ 5%.