Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2019 Feb 12.
Published in final edited form as: Environ Int. 2018 Nov 29;123:104–113. doi: 10.1016/j.envint.2018.11.049

Table 3.

Associations of time-weighted water arsenic and urinary arsenic with relative abundance of individual bacterial taxa.

Taxonomy Mean (range) relative abundance,
%
Standard deviation of relative abundance,
%
βa (95% CI; relative abundance, %) P-value Adjusted P-valueb
Time-weighted water arsenic
Class RF3 0.02 (0–1.3) 0.09 0.01 (< 0.01, 0.02) 0.04 0.60
Order ML615J-28 0.02 (0–1.3) 0.09 0.01 (< 0.01, 0.02) 0.04 0.90
Time-weighted urinary arsenic
Class Epsilonproteobacteria 0.06 (0–1.7) 0.22 0.03 (< 0.01, 0.06) 0.04 0.49
Order Campylobacterales 0.06 (0–1.7) 0.22 0.03 (< 0.01, 0.06) 0.04 0.63
Genus Anaerostipes 0.03 (0–0.4) 0.04 0.01 (< 0.01, 0.01) 0.04 0.82
Genus Faecalibacterium 2.9 (0–13.6) 1.86 0.26 (0.03, 0.50) 0.03 0.82
a

Coefficient from linear regression model indicates difference in relative abundance of individual bacterial taxa in relation to per 1-SD increase in time-weighted water arsenic (75.7 μg/L) or urinary arsenic (193.8 μg/g creatinine), adjusting for sex, age, BMI, smoking, and education.

b

P values were corrected for multiple testing using the Benjamini-Hochberg procedure to control false discovery rate (FDR) ≤ 5%.