Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2019 Dec 1.
Published in final edited form as: Neuroimage. 2018 Aug 2;183:532–543. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2018.07.066

Figure 9:

Figure 9:

Comparison of mean σn/μn over all 30 subjects for three cases: From left to right, the images show within subject variability when no processing is applied, when DESIGNER is applied, and when the standard processing pipeline with smoothing (1.25xVS) is applied. The coefficient of variation is lowest in parametric maps processed with DESIGNER compared to processing with both topup+eddy and with smoothing.