Abstract
During many years, the milk fat has been unfairly undervalued due to its association with higher levels of cardiovascular diseases, dyslipidaemia or obesity, among others. However, currently, this relationship is being re-evaluated because some of the dairy lipid components have been attributed potential health benefits. Due to this, and based on the increasing incidence of cancer in our society, this review work aims to discuss the state of the art concerning scientific evidence of milk lipid components and reported anticancer properties. Results from the in vitro and in vivo experiments suggest that specific fatty acids (FA) (as butyric acid and conjugated linoleic acid (CLA), among others), phospholipids and sphingolipids from milk globule membrane are potential anticarcinogenic agents. However, their mechanism of action remains still unclear due to limited and inconsistent findings in human studies.
Keywords: ANTICANCER ACTIVITIES, Dairy products, fatty acids, phospholipids, sphingolipids
Lipid metabolism, genetics and cancer
Cancer is the term to define a group of diseases characterized by uncontrolled growth and spread of cells affecting any part of the body. These ‘out-of-control’ cells also have the ability to invade surrounding lymph nodes, tissues or organs (metastatic cancer) as well as spread to distant sites in the body. This uncontrolled, oncogene-driven proliferation of cancer cells, lacking an efficient vascular system, quickly depletes the nutrient and oxygen supply from the normal vasculature and becomes hypoxic [1]. Due to this, one of the main hallmarks of cancer is a metabolic reprogramming consistent with the Warburg effect: increased glucose uptake and fermentation to lactate to promote growth, survival, proliferation and long-term maintenance [2]. Thus, normal cells use glycolysis to produce pyruvate that is transferred to the mitochondria to produce acetyl-CoA for further utilization in the tricarboxylic acid cycle (Figure 1), but cancer cells produce citrate that is converted in the cytoplasm into acetyl-CoA by the ATP citrate-lyase (ACL) [3].
Figure 1. Metabolic alterations in cancer cells.
Yellow label: substrate/product; red label: enzyme; green label: reaction; dotted arrow: transport; orange arrow: reaction.
Moreover, cancer cells can also rely on acetate uptake from three different sources: foods (e.g. meat, cheese, pickles), intestinal microbiota (fibre fermentation, besides resulting in short-chain fatty acid (SCFA), propionate and butyrate) and liver (while fasting, acylCoA thioesterase 12 (ACOT12) is activated and hydrolyses acetyl-CoA) [4]. Thus, although membranes are passively permeable to acetic acid (pKa: 4.75), intestinal pH (5.5–7) favours anionic forms and therefore exists three active transport mechanisms involving: (i) monocarboxylate transporters (MCTs; coupling acetate plus SCFA uptake and excretion of bicarbonate), (ii) sodium-coupled MCTs (SMCTs; that primarily uptake butyrate) and finally (iii) proton-coupled MCTs (co-transport of SCFA and H+) [4]. The latter form seems to be the main mechanism in colon and many other cancer types [5].
This scenario results in a characteristic lipogenic signature where acetyl-CoA serves as a substrate for acetyl-CoA carboxylase (ACC) to produce de novo synthesis of FA while other key enzymes of this pathway (i.e. fatty acid (FA) synthase (FAS); stearoyl-CoA desaturase (SDC); FA elongase 6/7 (ELOVL6/7); FA uptake as FABP4 and CD36) are up-regulated [6,7]. On the other hand, the mevalonate pathway is also involved and acetyl-CoA is used to produce cholesterol (CHOL), steroid hormones and non-steroid isoprenoids (needed for cell survival) by 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl-coenzyme A reductase (HMG-CoA) [8]. Although many previous oncogenic studies concluded that enzymes of this pathway were unregulated [9], recent follow-up research investigations carried out with 1116 human patients reported that HMG-CoA expression was associated with less aggressive breast tumor characteristics [10].
There are two isoforms of ACC, one located in the cytosol (ACC1) and associated with the FA synthesis, while the second form is a negative regulator of β-oxidation as it allosterically inhibits carnitine palmitoyl transferase I (CPT1) [11]. Both are highly regulated by transcriptional factors as sterol regulatory element binding protein (SRBP1, regulating genes for FA and TAG synthesis; SRBP2, involved in CHOL biosynthesis) [12], liver X factors (activated by insulin to induce SRBP1 mRNA) [13] and carbohydrate response element binding protein (ChREBP, activated by glucose to produce FA) [14]. Polymerization is required for the activity of these enzymes as mediated by MIG12 protein while ACC2 is also requires citrate [11,15]. However, Spot 14 (S14), a protein encoded by Thrsp gene, can form complexes with MIG12, therefore restraining the citrate-induced polymerization and acting as a metabolic inhibitor of ACC [16].
The hypoxic environment activates the transcriptional regulator hypoxia-inducible factor (HIF) by loss in hydroxylating capacity of oxygen sensors (i.e. PHD and FIH-1) or through an epigenetic way leading to both reduction in tumor-suppression functions (i.e. ING4, p53, PTEN, VHL) and activation of oncogenes (Ras, Raf, Src, mTOR and Myc) [17]. However, although HIF can provoke metabolic imbalance, there is also an HIF-independent pathway where it is activated by growth factors acting through PI3K/PTEN/AKT or RAS/RAF/MAPK signalling cascades [18].
Therefore, the key role of ACC and the fact that HIF up-regulates FAS and lipid transporters such as CD34 or FA-binding proteins [19] set a unique lipid signature in cancer cells: de novo synthesis directs towards production of palmitic and other unsaturated FAs as oleic acid together with lipid accumulation preferentially in the form of free FA (FFA), phospholipids (PLS) and cholesteryl esters [7,20]. According to this, research studies carried out both in breast cancer and normal adjacent tissues reported increments in the levels of phosphatidylcholine (PC), phosphatidylinositol (PI), phosphatidylethanolamine (PE) and sphingomyelin (SM), mainly in ER status, being negatively associated with the presence of PC (C16/C16) and PC (CN32) to survival [21]. These authors also observed that silencing of SCD, ACC, INSIG1 and ELOVL1 genes strongly decreased cell viability while knockdown of FAS increased apoptosis.
Lipid uptake is also an important feature as breast and liposarcoma cell lines produced CD36 (FA translocase) and lipoprotein lipase (LPL), the latter associated with an aggressive basal gene expression in breast cancer [22]. Furthermore, CD36 has been associated with activation of metastatic genes in cell lines and animal studies, while in humans it strongly correlates with poor disease free survival in lung, bladder, breast and melanoma cancer [23].
Dairy fat and health
Milk and dairy products are an important source of many essential nutrients as calcium, liposoluble vitamins (A, D, E and K) and carotenoids, bioactive peptides, essential FA, sphingolipids as well as other functional compounds with many benefits on health [24]. Despite this, during the last few years the dairy products intake has been perceived as unhealthy due to the presence of saturated FAs (SFA), trans-FAs (TFA) and CHOL as compounds associated with a higher risk of cardiovascular diseases, obesity or type 2 diabetes. Thus, some nutritional recommendations encouraged a low intake of fat dairy products or directly the consumption of low-fat dairy products, which means the loss of healthy components as some polyunsaturated FA (PUFA), vitamins or polar lipids (PL) [25]. Nowadays, the general perception about whole-fat dairy products has been improved by a high number of investigations which have not only refuted these ideas [26,27] but even highlighted the biological activity that some milk fat components can carry out in human health [28–30]. Supported by these studies, dairy fat is being re-evaluated and an increase in the interest of its components regarding to the beneficial functions in the maintenance, prevention and improvement of human health, as cancer, is occurring [31]. Cancer is a disease, whose incidence has been increasing in our society over the last years and, due to this, some reviews concerning this theme have been published. These studies have been focused on the effects of different anticancer compounds (Figure 2) but from non-dairy sources [24,32–34]. On the other hand, those carried out with dairy products do not include the lipid fraction and/or they are not aimed in anticancer activity [35–38].
Figure 2. Schema summarizing the pathways related with the anticancer effects of milk lipids.
Consequently, and overcoming this limited information, this review aims to expose the scientific evidence that relate the anticancer compounds in dairy fat, as FA, phospho- and sphingolipids and others related before.
Dairy FAs and cancer
FAs in milk can be found esterified to the different compounds in fat (Table 1) as in triacylglycerides (TAG) and, to a lesser extent, to other glycerolipids as diacylglycerides (DAG) and monoacylglycerides (MAG) or PLS (phospho- and sphingolipids); they can also be found in free form (FFA). However, because of the animal origin of this fat, most of the FAs are saturated, reaching values from 60 to 70 g FA/100 g fat. On the other hand, the monounsaturated FA (MUFA) and PUFA contents comprise 20–25% and 3–5% respectively (Table 2). Among the SFA, it is remarkable that the presence of C14:0, C16:0 and C18:0, which in sum represents ~50% of total FA. Contrary to what has always been thought, in terms of their effects, it is known that in a scenario of moderate intake, there are no scientific evidence suggesting an increment in the risk of cardiovascular diseases [30,39,40]. Moreover, it has been reported that C18:0 has beneficial effects reducing the plasmatic CHOL. Other minor SFA are the SCFA C4:0 and C6:0 and the medium-chain FA (MCFA) C8:0 and C10:0 with different positive effects on the human health, not only as anticarcinogenics as it will be explained below, but also as antibacterial and antiviral agents [41–43]. Moreover, these latter groups of SCFA are easily absorbed from the intestine into the circulatory system without resynthesis of TAG and can be incorporated into tissues faster than FA with higher number of carbons, being very useful in case of gastrointestinal disorders [44] or used as a quick source of energy.
Table 1. Lipid composition of cows milk (minimum and maximum range in % of fat).
Compound | % minimum | % maximum |
---|---|---|
TAG | 97.0 | 98.0 |
DAG | 0.3 | 0.6 |
MAG | 0.2 | 0.4 |
FFA | 0.1 | 0.4 |
Phospho- and sphingolipids | 0.2 | 1.0 |
CHOL | 0.3 | 0.4 |
Others | Traces |
Data adapted from Jensen [59].
TAG: triacylglycerols; DAG: diacylglycerols; MAG: monoacylgliderols; FFA: Free fatty acids; CHOL: Cholesterol
Table 2. Mean composition (g/100 g of total FA) of main FA in cow, ewe and goat’s milks.
FA | Cow | Ewe | Goat |
---|---|---|---|
C4:0 | 3.13 | 3.51 | 2.18 |
C6:0 | 1.94 | 2.90 | 2.39 |
C8:0 | 1.17 | 2.64 | 2.73 |
C10:0 | 2.48 | 7.82 | 9.97 |
C12:0 | 2.99 | 4.38 | 4.99 |
C14:0 | 10.38 | 10.43 | 9.81 |
C14:1 cis-9 | 1.08 | 0.28 | 0.18 |
C15:0 iso | 0.29 | 0.34 | 0.13 |
C15:0 anteiso | 0.50 | 0.47 | 0.21 |
C15:0 | 1.05 | 0.99 | 0.71 |
C16:0 iso | 0.22 | 0.21 | 0.24 |
C16:0 | 28.51 | 25.93 | 28.23 |
C16:1 cis-9 | 1.73 | 1.03 | 1.59 |
C17:0 iso | 0.55 | 0.53 | 0.35 |
C17:0 anteiso | 0.52 | 0.30 | 0.42 |
C17:0 | 0.73 | 0.63 | 0.72 |
C18:0 | 10.51 | 9.57 | 8.88 |
C18:1 cis-9 | 20.50 | 18.20 | 19.29 |
C18:1 trans (total) | 4.25 | 2.90 | 2.12 |
C18:2 cis-9 cis-12 | 3.13 | 2.33 | 3.19 |
C18:2 others | 1.03 | 0.88 | 0.70 |
C18:3 cis-9 cis-12 cis-15 | 0.59 | 0.63 | 0.42 |
Conjugated linoleic acid (CLA) | 1.03 | 0.74 | 0.70 |
Σ SFA | 64.97 | 70.65 | 71.96 |
Σ MUFA | 27.56 | 22.41 | 23.18 |
Σ PUFA | 5.78 | 4.58 | 5.01 |
Adapted from: Jensen [59], Alonso et al. [185], Goudjil et al. [186], Moate et al. [187] and Castro-Gómez et al. [200].
cis: cis double bond; iso/anteiso: branched chain fatty acid; trans: trans double bond; Σ SFA: total sum of saturated fatty acids; Σ MUFA: total sum of monounsaturated fatty acids; Σ PUFA: total sum of polyunsaturated fatty acids.
The MUFA fraction is mainly composed of oleic acid (C18:1 cis 9) associated with anticancer activities, reduction in plasmatic CHOL, improvement in the autoimmune system and reduction in the risk of inflammatory and cardiovascular diseases [45]. On the other hand, despite the reported negative effects of the octadecenoic TFA in the development of cardiovascular diseases [46,47], some studies suggest that dairy TFA can exert a different effect. Most of the studies, concerning these kind of FA, are carried out using industrial TFA from the biohydrogenation of vegetable oils (C18:1 trans 10, C18:1 trans 9) [48] while the main TFA in milk fat is trans-vaccenic acid (TVA) (C18:1 trans 11) (50–60% of total TFA and 2–6% of total FA) that may have positive effects on lipid metabolism and arteriosclerosis [49] as well as it is also the physiological precursor of rumenic acid (RA), a potent modulator of the lipid metabolism [50].
Related to PUFA profile, although they are in low concentration, there are interesting FA: C18:2 cis 9, cis 12 and C18:3 cis 9, cis 12 with not only beneficial effects for cardiovascular diseases but are also essential FA for the synthesis of other omega 6 and 3 compounds [51]. Furthermore, the different isomers of conjugated linoleic acid (CLA), overall RA C18:2 cis 9, trans 11, have been also attributed positive effects in cancer, diabetes, hypertension, immunology and body weight, among other beneficial effects [52–58].
Anticancer effects
Some functional FA as SCFA (i.e. butyric acid, caproic acid and caprylic acid), odd-branched chain FA (OBCFA; e.g. margaric acid and phytanic acid), MUFA (e.g. palmitoleic acid, vaccenic acid, oleic acid) and PUFA (e.g. linoleic acid, linolenic acid, CLA and CLnA) [59,60] have been studied in many investigations due to the reported positive outcomes provided in different types of cancer risk.
CLA isomers
CLA is the acronym of CLA isomers (CLnA), mainly characterized by the presence of conjugated double bonds in the positions 6–14 (6,8; 7,9; 8,10; 9,11; 10,12; 11,13; 12,14), with four geometric groups (trans,trans,cis,trans–trans,cis and cis,cis) yielding 28 possible isomers [61]. Natural sources of these compounds are meat (0.12–0.68%) and mainly ruminants’ milk where they represent 0.34–1.07% of the total FA [62,63]. These isomers originated as a result of the biohydrogenation of PUFA (linoleic and linolenic acids from diet) by rumen bacteria and the action of the Δ9-desaturase enzyme (SDC) in the mammary gland on TVA (C18:1 t11), being RA (C18:2 c9, t11) the most abundant compound (75–90% of total CLA) [64]. These compounds attracted much attention since the studies of Ha et al. [65] describing the anticarcinogenic activities on mouse epidermal tumor of fried ground beef extracts, associating CLA with this activity. Although these properties are widely accepted as a result of several studies performed in cell lines and animals, there are few clinical studies conducted on humans which relate CLA intake with the incidence of cancer and most data are only from epidemiological studies [66]. Thus, cohort studies (4697 women, cancer free) during a follow-up period of 25 years and collecting food consumption data, reported a significant inverse association between milk intake and breast cancer [67]. Moreover, Aro et al. [68] after examining 403 Finnish patients during 4 years with breast cancer, reported that a CLA-rich diet (specially through cheese intake) might have anticarcinogenic effects in post-menopausal women. These results seem to be supported by further works involving 60708 women assaying the intake of high-fat dairy foods during 10 years. The authors concluded that the subjects consuming ≥4 servings of these foodstuffs (milk, cheese, sour cream and butter) showed lower risk of colorectal cancer while each increment of two servings reduced the risk in 13% [69]. However, these results are not conclusive since they were not specifically conducted testing CLA isomers but a food matrix. Furthermore, other studies carried out in women with breast cancer, invasive breast carcinoma or benign breast disease failed to reveal any positive correlation between CLA and incidence of cancer [70,71]. Nevertheless, it has to be mentioned that analysis of subcellular fractions from normal and cancerous parts of human tests revealed that CLA content was significantly higher in testicular carcinoma, but low in the mitochondrial fraction of this tumor in comparison with normal tissue [72].
Currently, two theories have been proposed to explain the possible biological effects of these isomers [73]. In the first one, CLA isomers replace arachidonic acid in the membrane phospholipids, altering the synthesis of eicosanoids that are involved in cell signalling. This may be the reason behind the increment in the levels of IgA, IgM and pro- (TNFα, cytokines and IL1β) and anti-inflammatory (IL-10) markers reported in both men (healthy) and women (healthy and overweight) assaying a dose of 1.1–3 g/day [54,74] or in human hepatitis B antibodies in men with 1.7 g/day for 12 weeks [75]. In a recent study in mice, C18:2 c9, t11 (RA) reduced arthritis severity equivalently to celecoxib, through a reduction in IL-6 and interleukin 1 β (IL-1β), thus suggesting that dietary RA may be an effective cyclooxygenase (COX2) inhibitor [76]. The second proposed mechanism places CLA as an agonist of all PPAR isoforms [77], proteins involved in adipocyte differentiation/proliferation, glucose uptake, mitochondrial function and inflammation [78].
In 2013, a clinical trial was assayed in women to determine whether CLA modulates the lipogenic pathway in human breast cancer tissue [79]. Results after intake of 7.5 g/d CLA (gel capsules containing 1:1 mixture of C18:2 c9, t11 and C18:2 t10, c12), showed reduced expression of both S14 and proliferative marker Ki-67 in primary invasive breast cancer. However, only patients with highest S14 IHC score (2) showed suppression, suggesting that initial metabolic status of these tumors may influence the CLA response. In further studies conducted on mice models of mammary cancer, animals lacking S14 resulted in the reduction in MCFA and FAS activity [80]. This impaired FA synthesis reduced solid tumor proliferation, cystic lesions and Src/Akt phosphorylation.
However, available information about anticancer properties of CLA on humans is still scarce. Therefore, there may be other yet unknown factors that are still challenges to address and more research focused on this topic is needed.
TVA
TVA is the main trans-octadecenoic FA in milk fat and its content comprises from 0.5–0.8 g/100 g fat in cow’s milk to 2 g/100 g fat in goat’s milk, although levels can be higher if the animal feed is supplemented with PUFA sources (e.g. extruded linseed) [81–83]. As commented above, TVA is produced by rumen bacteria during biohydrogenation of PUFA and metabolized in the mammary gland and other tissues into RA [84]. This bioconversion of TVA in humans would increase current estimates of CLA available for the general population by 6–10 fold. Thus, being precursor of an anticarcinogenic FA, some research works were focused in the positive effects of TVA on breast cancer. In Sprague–Dawley female rats injected with methylnitrosourea to induce mammary tumors and testing seven diets (ad libitum) with increasing content of TVA (0.13–1.60 g/100 g diet) and low in CLA (0.18–0.37 g/100 g diet), the results showed that the conversion of dietary TVA to RA caused a dose-dependent increase in the accumulation of CLA in the mammary fat pad and a parallel reduction in total tumor number and incidence [85]. This confirmed previous studies where the same effects were found and it was suggested that the anticancer response to TVA may be likely mediated by its endogenous conversion into CLA [86]. However, recently it has been reported that in cell lines T47D knockdown for SDC using siRNA, addition of TVA (50–200 μM) reduced proliferation [87].
It has been reported elsewhere that metabolic reprogramming is induced by long-term inflammatory signals in colorectal cancer cells [88]. Thus, adding elaidic acid (C18:1 t9; the main industrial trans fat) to umbilical vein endothelial cells (HUVEC) and human hepatocellular carcinoma (HepG2) cells increased SDC, while TVA reduced the tumour necrosis factor-α (TNF-α) induced gene expression of TNF, VCAM-1 and SOD2 in HUVEC and IL-8 in HepG2 cells [89].
Conjugated linolenic acid isomers
CLA compounds are not the only conjugated FA that can be found in dairy fat. The presence of C18:3 c9,t11,c15 and C18:3 c9,t11,t15 has been described as the main conjugated linolenic acid isomers (CLnA) in milk fat and meat of ruminants as a result of the biohydrogenation processes in the rumen [90]. The concentration in milk for C18:3 c9,t11,c15 has been reported between 0.03 and 0.39 g/100g of fat and for C18:3 c9,t11,t15: 0.02–0.06 g/100g of fat [91,92]. Concerning ruminant meat, C18:3 c9,t11,c15 and C18:3 c9,t11,t15 isomers, were found in steer (0.08 and 0.02 mg/g respectively), cow (0.06 and 0.02 mg/g respectively) and goat (0.28 and 0.03 g/100 g fat respectively) [93–95]. These compounds have attracted much attention in the last years due to their biological effects similar to those exerted by CLA but at lower doses [96]. Currently, the investigations of anticancer properties have been carried out using vegetable oils with different isomer composition to that found in dairy products [97] and interestingly some results have shown that CLnA are metabolized to RA [98]. The CLnA isomers found in dairy products, C18:3 c9,t11,c15 and C18:3 c9,t11,t15, have a high bioactive potential as they combine in a same molecule conjugated double bonds and omega 3; thus, in order to bypass their low concentrations in those products that hinder the study of their bioactivity, some investigations assayed the microbiological production of these isomers [99] as well as the in vivo production [100]. This opens interesting possibilities for the future investigations of the anticancer activities of CLnA isomers present in new functional foodstuffs.
OBCFAs
Their structures are usually saturated acyl chains with odd number of carbon atoms and the branch is a methyl group in the –iso or –anteiso position, although there are also polybranched compounds. They can be found in most plants (trace levels), milk and adipose tissue in cows, goats and ewes and other animals with symbiotic fermentation [101]. The OBCFAs make up ~2% of total FA in cow’s milk and there are two possible sources for their presence: incorporation from rumen bacterial lipids or de novo synthesis. However, although odd chain and anteiso isomers can be synthesized in the mammary gland, the contribution of this process to milk content is negligible [102]. On the other hand, in bacterial synthesis, pentadecanoic (C15) and margaric (C17) acids are formed through elongation of propionate or valerate, whereas precursors of branched-chain FA (C13i, C14i, C15i, C16i, C17i, C18i, C13ai, C15ai, C17ai) are valine, leucine and isoleucine and their corresponding branched, short-chain carboxylic acids (isobutyric, isovaleric and 2-methyl butyric acids). The major branched-chain FA are the C15ai and C17ai that account for ~60% of total OBCFAs. Finally, the multibranched chain phytanic acid (3,7,11,15-tetramethylhexadecanoic) derived from phytol (side chain of chlorophyll) after released by rumen microorganisms is hydrogenated and oxidized into pristanic acid (2,6,10,14-tetramethylhexadecanoic) [101]. It has been described that rumen bacteria can also remove the α-carbon of palmitic (C16) or stearic (C18) acids to form the corresponding hydroxyl FA followed by further decarboxylation producing C15 and C17 [103]. Thus, these FA are taken up by the animal and used by the mammary glands to produce milk. Some issues have been pointed out according to the metabolism of phytanic acid in humans that after ingestion it is transported into peroxisomes but this FA can only be catabolized through α-oxidation to form pristanic acid, followed of isomerization by α-methylacyl-CoA racemase (AMACR), β-oxidation and finally production of CO2 and water in the mitochondria [104]. These multiple rounds of β-oxidation generate reactive oxygen species (ROS) with the potential to create molecular damage. Moreover, AMACR is strongly overexpressed in several cancers, notably in prostate and colorectal cancer and therefore some investigations were conducted to study the relationship between dietary intake, serum and tissue concentrations of phytanic acid and AMACR expression in histologically benign human prostate. Thus, analysis of plasma, tissues and food frequency questionnaire from men undergoing radical prostatectomy revealed that high-fat dairy intake correlated to circulating phytanic acid but not to its concentration in tissues and AMCR expression [105]. Investigations carried out with Finnish smokers showed that serum levels of phytanic and pristanic acids correlated with saturated fat, dairy products and butter but not with the risk of total or aggressive prostate cancer [106]. On the other hand, it has been reported elsewhere that phytanic acid is a retinoid-X receptor (RXR) and peroxisome proliferator activated receptor-α (PPAR-α) agonist at physiological levels and therefore acts on the energetic metabolism lipids [107]. Thus, OBCFA reduced the acetate incorporation into FFA and FA esters, showing the inhibition of FA biosynthesis (ACC down-regulation) and inhibition of NADPH production (through inhibition of glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase) in human breast cancer cells in a level comparable with that of CLA [108]. Recently, addition of C15i (35–140 µg/ml) to bladder cancer cells resulted in inhibition of proliferation in a dose- and time-dependent manner by inducing apoptosis through decreased expression of Bcl-2 and increased expression of Bax. This promoted mitochondrial dysfunction, leading to the release of cytochrome c from the mitochondria to the cytoplasm, as well as the proteolytic activation of caspases [109].
SCFA and MCFA
Butyric (C4), caproic (C6), caprilyc (C8) and capric (C10) FA are characteristic compounds of milk fat resulting from the fermentative processes of the rumen bacteria of the ruminants. These SCFA compounds are volatile and therefore responsible for the characteristic flavour in some products as cheeses. During cheese ripening, the action of lipases and esterases releases SCFA and MCFA [110]. Interestingly, the health value of goat milk has been recorded in ancient Jewish literature as well as in Asian and Mediterranean countries associated with the concentration of SCFA as C6, C8 and specially C10, which constitutes ~15% of the total FA content [111].
Some recent research works reported that MCFA produced from prebiotics reduced the risk of developing cancer [112] and highly ripened cheeses were capable of demonstrating antiproliferative activity and induction of apoptotic DNA damage on human leukaemia cells [113]. In further studies assaying the same cell line, these authors found that cheeses showed a concentration-dependent inhibition that may be also associated with the ripening length and therefore to the concentration of FFA [114]. Moreover, mixtures of C4, C6, C8 and C10 down-regulated genes involved in cycle division and progression of human cell lines of colorectal (cyclin-dependent kinase 2 (CDK2); cyclin-dependent kinase 4 (CDK4); CDC 28 protein kinase 1B (CKSIb); cyclin A2 (CCNA2) and cyclin D (CCND1)) and skin carcinoma (CKSIb, CCNA2 and CCND1) and mammary gland adenocarcinoma (CDK4, CKSIb, CCNA2 and CCND1) and, in general, lower the chain length lesser the efficiency [111]. This study also reported that for colon cancer cells the Gadd45a gene was up-regulated and incremented the caspase-8 activity. Other authors have pointed out that butyric acid (C4) is a potent therapeutic agent [115] but there are difficulties in reaching effective plasma concentrations in vivo while its prodrug (tributyrin (TB)) naturally present in some products (e.g. dairy products) has favourable pharmacokinetic properties and is better orally tolerated [116]. Accordingly, when male Wistar rats were fed a diet containing TB from maltodextrin and treated with N,N-Dimethylhydrazine to induce colon carcinogenesis, diet containing TB reduced the total number of aberrant crypt foci, increased the apoptotic index and reduced the DNA damage [117]. Moreover, in an experiment on induction of resistant hepatocyte carcinogenesis in male Wistar rats, gavage with TB (1 g.kg−1 body weight) reduced the number of GSTP-positive hepatic foci (a marker of liver carcinogenesis) together with genes involved in angiogenesis (Itgb6, Itgad, Ftl3, Map3k6, Mgp and Src) as it stimulates the vascular endothelial growth factor A (VEGFA) [118].
Acetylation/deacetylation of histone and non-histone proteins (e.g. p53, STAT, GATA) is one of the mechanisms related to transcription control [119,120]. Such processes have been also associated with cancer [121,122] where sirtuins (SIRT) have attracted much attention [123]. In recent investigations when hepatic cancer cells were exposed to butyrate, miR-22 was expressed to inhibit SIRT-22 while up-regulating cytochrome c, caspase 9, caspase 3 and especially gsk-3 and PTEN [124]; the latter two are known to be cancer suppressor genes.
Phospho- and sphingolipids
The PLS, which are classified in PE, PI, phosphatidylserine (PS) and PC, and the sphingolipids, mainly the SM, are PL with a crucial role of the maintenance and functionality of all the cell membranes [125,126]. Furthermore, they are not only critical for life maintenance; there are also numerous scientific evidence that support the positive effects of these dietary PLS on human health. Among these, remarkable are not only the anticancer effects, as will be further explained, but also those involved in cognitive development or neurological diseases (e.g. Alzheimer or Parkinson), fatty liver disease, reduction in cardiovascular risk and inflammation (rheumatoid arthritis) [32,33,35].
The PLS are widely distributed in foods due to their presence both in animal and vegetable cells. However, their composition is different according to source. Thus, while fruits, vegetables and tubers have almost non-existent content of PLS [127], egg yolk [128], soy [129], squid or krill oil [130] are the sources with high content of these compounds, providing mainly PC [33,131]. Ruminant brain tissues are a good source of all PL, although its consumption is strongly restricted due to the spongiform encephalopathy risk transmission. These limitations turn milk fat and specially the milk fat globule membrane (MFGM) in the only dietary source of all phospholipids and SM [132]. The MFGM surrounds TAG, protecting them against lipolysis and oxidation [133]. MFGM is a unique lipid trilayer where an inner monolayer, rich in protein and acquired from the endoplasmic reticulum of mammary cell, followed by a bilayer from the cell membrane resulting from the globule excretion [134]. The MFGM is mainly composed of proteins (50–70% weight) and PLS that are differently distributed throughout those membranes with a total content reaching 25–40% of total weight. The inner monolayer is mainly composed of PE, PI and PS, while the outer side of the MFGM bilayer contains mainly SM and PC. Interestingly, SM forms structures with CHOL (CHOL rafts) with critical roles in multiple cellular functions that include cell signalling, cell adhesion among others [135,136]. In terms of the concentration of each PLS in MFGM, PE, PC and SM are the most abundant moieties with content in the range 26.4–46.4%, 21.1–42.8% and 17.3–29.2% of total PLS respectively, while PI (3.4–14.1%) and PS (2.0–16.1%) are minor compounds (Table 3) [33,132].
Table 3. Phospho- and sphingolipid contents (% on total PLS) in cow’s milk.
References | PE | PI | PS | PC | SM |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Fagan and Wijesundera [188] | 38.6 | – | – | 32.2 | 29.2 |
Avalli and Contarini [189] | 32.3 | 9.3 | 10.5 | 27.3 | 20.5 |
Rombaut et al. [190] | 33.2 | 5.2 | 9.3 | 27.4 | 25.1 |
Rombaut et al. [191] | 46.4 | 5.3 | 7.4 | 21.1 | 19.8 |
Fong et al. [192] | 32.6 | 7.6 | 5.3 | 33.2 | 21.3 |
Fauquant et al. [193] | 36.4 | 7.6 | 6.5 | 32.1 | 17.3 |
Lopez et al. [194] | 26.8 | 13.6 | 16.1 | 22.0 | 21.6 |
Sánchez-Juanes et al. [195] | 28.5 | 14.1 | 32.7 | 23.0 | |
Rodríguez-Alcalá and Fontecha [196] | 38.5 | 6.5 | 7.7 | 25.9 | 21.4 |
Gallier et al. [197] | 26.4 | 3.4 | 2.0 | 42.8 | 25.5 |
Le et al. [198] | 36.9 | 6.1 | 6.3 | 27.0 | 23.7 |
Garcia et al. [199] | 33.8 | 3.9 | 10.6 | 30.5 | 21.2 |
Castro-Gomez et al. [200] | 42.0 | 3.9 | 3.4 | 29.3 | 21.0 |
Dates: Castro-Gomez et al. [33].
Other components present in low amounts in the MFGM are CHOL, FFA, glycoproteins and glycolipids [137].
Anticancer effects
Many research investigations focused their studies in the determination of possible bioactivity of dietary PL through in vivo and in vitro assessments. Among all their positive effects [32,33,35], antiproliferative and preventive properties against cancer have been intensively studied. Despite most of them have been carried out testing PLS from egg, soy or marine sources, very limited information is available concerning dairy PL. According to the current literature, PLS bioactivity may rely on: (i) increased phospholipase A activity in cancer thus releasing bioactive milk FA [7], (ii) the reported effects of MFGM lipids to decrease CHOL and TAG levels [138] further supported by findings of lower levels of HMG-CoA (CHOL, steroid hormones and non-steroid isoprenoids) and SREBP1c (FA and TG synthesis) in human plasma [139] and (iii) SM properties are due to its metabolization from ceramides by sphingomyelinases that are activated by apoptotic signals and downstream proapoptotic members of the Bcl-2 family [140,141].
Colon cancer
Although there is a lack of investigation assaying milk PL, the existing bibliography allows hypothesizing the potential of such compounds. Thus, in vitro and in vivo studies carried out with soy and marine PLS showed antiproliferative effects in SW-480 and Caco-2 colon cancer cells, as well as an increment in the apoptosis in a colon tumor induced in F334 rats [142,143]. Some authors attributed the observed effect to the presence of omega 3 FA and improved bioactivity when they are linked to PLS rather than to TAG, due to better absorption [144–146]. However, this assumption is not valid for the reported antiproliferative effect observed with dairy PLS as they have low concentrations of omega 3 FA.
An in vivo study performed with 344 Fischer rats with aberrant foci crypts (colon cancer), showed that the diet supplemented with MFGM (rich in dairy PLS and bioactive proteins) and dairy fat (in proportion 1:1) at a concentration of 25 g/kg diet during 3 weeks reduced the incidence of this cancer [147]. This was also observed in other studies, which after isolating native MFGM from raw milk, reported inhibition of the proliferation of HT-29 and Caco-2 colon cancer cells in vitro [148,149]. These results suggest the use of MFGM and milk fat fraction as potential nutraceuticals or medical foods [150]. Based on these studies, the effects could be attributed to possible bioactive proteins present in MFGM and not the PL themselves. However a recent in vitro study [151] assessing the antiproliferative effect of a pure lipid concentrate of dairy PL, reported a total growth inhibition of colon cancer line HT29 at concentrations below 250 µl/ml. It is important to highlight the role of the use of food-grade solvent for PLS concentrates isolation, that seems to be a critical factor to the phospholipid and sphingolipid bioactivity maintenance [152].
Similarly, the role of SM in cellular growth control, differentiation, migration and apoptosis has led to an exhaustive study of this compound to be proposed as a possible treatment against colon cancer [153,154]. These results are supported by a research work in which it was observed that SM isolated from dairy fat decreased the number of aberrant foci crypts and provided a protective effect in induced colon cancer in mice ICR. They were fed ad libitum a diet consisting of dairy SM added at a concentration of 0.5 g/kg of food during 22 weeks [155]. This effect can be explained because dietary SM inhibited tumorigenesis and increased the alk-SMase activity. This enzyme is associated with the increase in the mRNA expression, which in turn, may contribute to the inhibitory effects of SM in this cancer. Interestingly, similar experiments in murines also fed with isolated dairy SM (as a supplement in the diet), showed that it was not only chemotherapeutic, but also chemopreventive when it is administered before the tumor induction [155–158]. These chemopreventive effects of SM appear to be due to its principal metabolites, i.e. sphingosine, sphingosine phosphate and ceramide, which induce apoptosis due to the modification of the expression of regulator genes in cancer [140,159]. Furthermore, a study by Schmelz et al. [160] reported that the administration of isolated dairy SM at a concentration of 0.005 g/100 g of diet in CF1 mice, transformed malignant adenocarcinoma to benign adenoma.
It is important to highlight that although SM seems to be the most active PL against cancer, other phospholipids also have an important role. Thus, it was reported elsewhere that milk SM is transported as a ceramide to lymph after hydrolysis and absorption; nevertheless intake of this sphingolipid together with other acylglicerols enhanced its bioavailability [161].
Breast and prostate cancer
Although studies in vivo or in humans have not been carried out with breast and prostate cancers, these carcinogenic cells have been widely studied and nowadays it is well known that prostate and breast cancer cells are particularly rich in CHOL rafts, whose density modifies cellular functionality and the evolution of metastasis [162].
The sphingolipids in the cell membranes are not the only PL with importance in breast and prostate cancer development. Indeed, the presence or changes in some PLS seem to be an important biomarker. The study of Doria et al. [163] concerning breast cancer cells MCF10A, T47-D and MDA-MB-231 showed different PL composition in the membrane during the development of the disease. In the same way, three PC molecular species were also reported as biomarkers of progression in prostate cancer cells [164]. These findings need further confirmation due to the importance to understand the new metabolic routes involved in disease progression, early diagnosis or even for the development of new treatments.
In terms of dairy products intake and its relation with breast and prostate cancer, on one hand, Dong et al. [165] found that the increase in the consumption of dairy products may be associated with a reduced risk of breast cancer, however this effect is not attributed to dairy PL specifically. On the other hand, Parodi [166] did not find a correlation between dairy products intake and prostate cancer.
Related to the use of PL on breast and prostate cancer cells, a study of Abd El Baky et al. [167] reported an antiproliferative effect of microalgae PLS on MCF-7 breast cancer cells. The same result could not be concluded in a recent study [151] carried out with dairy PLS in the same cell line which did not report anticancer activity in an in vitro experiment. This difference could rely on the different lipid isolation methods used or on the different composition of the assessed samples.
Hepatic cancer
The liver cells have the peculiarity of easily incorporating omega 3 FA, which facilitates the lipogenesis inhibition and induces the apoptosis [168].
Although there is a lack of studies assaying dairy PLS against hepatic cancer, it is remarkable the effect of PL from other sources against this type of cancer. A cell growth decrease by 50% was observed in hepatic cancer cells Hep-G2 in a recent study using PL from microalgae [167]. Furthermore, other in vitro studies, using the cells Hep-3B, Hep-G2, HuH-7 and Alexander observed that after their treatment with isolated PC from soy and egg yolk, the cancer cell growth was inhibited. In vivo experiments carried out with the same cells and egg PL concentrate in Sprague–Dawley rats, also showed the same anticancer effects, which was potentiated by the presence of menaquinone-4 (vitamin K2). These rats were intragastrically fed a diet enriched at concentrations of 0.05 g of PL concentrate/100 g of diet during 14 weeks [169,170].
Moreover, sphingolipids also provide beneficial effects against hepatocellular carcinoma, even when external treatment is not administered: it has been suggested that sphingolipid metabolic pathway (e.g. conversion into ceramides) may be implicated [154].
Pancreatic cancer
The effects of PL in pancreatic cancer are mainly related to sphingolipids. Although in vivo or human studies have not been reported, it is well known that during the treatment with radio- and/or chemotherapy, there is a natural increment in plasma sphingolipids resulting in an improvement in the treatment effect. A possible explanation is that when the two proinflammatory cytokines, tumour necrosis factor-α (TNF-α) and IL-1β are present in blood, they play an important role in hydrolytic generation and accumulation of sphingolipids [171,172]. These latter compounds play a critical role in apoptosis according to their action as second messenger in the activation of enzymes involved in this process; pharmacologic manipulation of intracellular ceramide levels leading to attenuation or enhancement of drug resistance [173]. This is supported by a study in which utilization of SM isolated from egg yolk on pancreatic cancer cells AsPc1, increased the chemotherapeutic 5-fluorouracil effect [174].
Ovary cancer
It seems to exist in a relationship between the anticarcinogenic effect of ceramides in pancreatic and ovary cancer. A study carried out in vitro with drug-resistant ovary cancer cells (SKOV3), found evidence of inhibitory effects and apoptosis signalling when a synthetic ceramide was combined with the anticancer drug paclitaxel [175]. In vivo experiments were also conducted in female nu/nu (athymic) mice inoculated with SKOV3 tumor. The intravenous administration of the ceramides with the anticancer drug paclitaxel at a concentration of 80 mg/kg of rat and 20 mg/kg of rat respectively, resulted in a higher diminution of the tumors than when only the chemotherapeutic drug was used [176].
However, research studies focused on the effects of dairy PL on ovary cancer cells are limited. Only one study reported that the administration in vitro of a concentrate of phospho- and sphingolipids from buttermilk showed antiproliferative effect on ovary cancer line NCI/ADR-RES, at a concentration of ~100 µg/ml. The same research work found that IC50 in this cancer cell line of a dairy fat was 100 µg/ml. This activity could be explained by the presence of ~5% of SM in the extract [151].
Metastasis
Some investigations suggest that PL may affect cancer cells migration. A meta-analysis by Sun et al. [177] concluded that dairy products consumption was not associated with gastric cancer but regarding metastasis, PL seem to have beneficial properties. The phospholipids PE and PC and SM, exerted positive effects in gastric cancer cells NUGC-4 metastasis as it reduced adhesion and migration to other tissues [178].
Lysoform structures (phospholipids lacking one FA), e.g. lyso-PC, have also been shown to possess chemopreventive and antimetastatic properties. It occurs because when the PL release the FA, the lysoforms make cancer cells lose the adhesion capacity to other cells and platelets, inhibiting the migration to other tissues. This was supported by a study [179] which demonstrated that the commercial lyso-PC reduced B16-F10 melanoma cell adhesion, mediated by the expression of VLA-4 and P-selectineto in in vitro experiments. Furthermore, the same study in male C57B1/6N mice with the same intravenous cancer cells for lung invasion, observed that administration of lyso-PC at 450 mmol/l reduced the cell dissemination [179]. Despite the beneficial results against the metastasis, further studies are needed to gain deeper insight into the molecular mechanisms of lyso-PC.
Other types of cancer and the role of dairy PL in the treatment
Other investigations studied the effects of phospho- and sphingolipids from dairy sources against different cancer types. However, they reported non-conclusive results and therefore more research studies are needed. As an example, a recent research work associated for the first time antiproliferative activity of dairy PL against kidney and leukemia cancer cells [151]. These authors reported an IC50 on cell lines 786-O (kidney/adenocarcinoma) and K562 (bone marrow/myeloid leukaemia) at concentrations of 100 µg/ml and TGI at concentrations over 250 µg/ml when assaying a PL enriched fraction from buttermilk. Furthermore, Russell et al. [180] suggested that milk phospholipids act in a protective manner against UV exposure which is directly related with the development of skin cancer. Inspite of this, evaluation of the DNA damage is essential to assess if UV exposure alters the protein regulation within the cells.
Another example is bladder cancer. In a meta-analysis study [181] authors revealed an inverse association between whole milk intake and bladder cancer risk. Although consumption of skimmed milk was associated with development of bladder cancer [182], these effects were mainly attributed to caseins.
In terms of PL functionality, milk phospholipids have been also assessed in order to produce liposome structures. When assaying carriers for anticancer etoposide, PL isolated from camel milk showed highest efficiency delivering this drug in a mouse model of fibrosarcoma [183]. Recently, milk-derived exosomes, biological nanovesicles that are involved in cell–cell communication have been isolated and described in bovine milk. These exosomes can act as carriers for chemotherapeutic/chemopreventive agents [184].
Conclusion
Milk fat not only provides beneficial compounds for human nutrition, but also interesting activity against different kinds of cancer. This health condition is a group of disorders characterized by a profound metabolic reprogramming to sustain the cell proliferation partially relying on the FA, PL and cholesteryl ester synthesis as well as lipids uptake.
Current bibliography highlights dairy FA, namely butyric and some other short and MCFA, CLA and CLnA, TVA, branched-FA as well as different phospho- and sphingolipids as promising anticancer molecules. FA bioactivity is mediated by down-regulation of the ACC, FASN and HMG-CoA or specific genes associated with cell proliferation and apoptosis. About PL, the positive effects may be related to action of phospholipase, therefore releasing FA, reduction in adhesion capacity (metastasis) or through transformation of SM on to ceramides to downstream apoptotic Blc-2 proteins.
Although many research studies have pointed interesting properties against different forms of this disease, in vitro and in vivo studies results remain nowadays inconclusive and without a clear pharmaceutical application.
This clearly shows that more research is still needed involving human clinical trials allowing a better understanding of anticancer biochemistry related with fat dairy compounds.
Abbreviations
- ACC
acetyl-CoA carboxylase
- AMACR
α-methylacyl-CoA racemase
- CCNA2
cyclin A2
- CCND1
cyclin D
- CDK4
cyclin-dependent kinase 4
- CHOL
cholesterol
- CKSIb
CDC 28 protein kinase 1B
- CLA
conjugated linoleic acid
- CLnA
CLA isomer
- FA
fatty acid
- FAS
FA synthase
- FFA
free FA
- HIF
hypoxia-inducible factor
- HMG-CoA
3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl-coenzyme A reductase
- HUVEC
umbilical vein endothelial cell
- IL-1β
interleukin 1 β
- MCFA
medium-chain FA
- MCT
monocarboxylate transporter
- MFGM
milk fat globule membrane
- MUFA
monounsaturated FA
- OBCFA
odd-branched chain FA
- PC
phosphatidylcholine
- PE
phosphatidylethanolamine
- PI
phosphatidylinositol
- PL
polar lipid
- PS
phosphatidylserine
- PUFA
polyunsaturated FA
- RA
rumenic acid
- SCFA
short-chain FA
- SDC
stearoyl-CoA desaturase
- SIRT
sirtuin
- SM
sphingomyelin
- SRBP1
sterol regulatory element binding protein
- S14
Spot14
- TAG
triacylglicerol
- TB
tributyrin
- TFA
trans-FA
- TNF-α
tumour necrosis factor-α
- TVA
trans-vaccenic acid
Competing interests
The authors declare that there are no competing interests associated with the manuscript.
Funding
This work was supported by the Spanish Ministry of Science and Innovation and European FEDER Funds [grant number AGL2014-56464].
References
- 1.Eales K.L., Hollinshead K.E. and Tennant D.A. (2016) Hypoxia and metabolic adaptation of cancer cells. Oncogenesis 5, e190. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Liberti M.V. and Locasale J.W., The Warburg effect: how does it benefit cancer cells? Trends Biochem. Sci. 41, 211–218 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Yoshii Y., Furukawa T., Saga T. and Fujibayashi Y. (2015) Acetate/acetyl-CoA metabolism associated with cancer fatty acid synthesis: overview and application. Cancer Lett. 356, 211–216 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Schug Z.T., Vande Voorde J. and Gottlieb E. (2016) The metabolic fate of acetate in cancer. Nat. Rev. Cancer 16, 708–717 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Granja S., Tavares-Valente D., Queiros O. and Baltazar F. (2017) Value of pH regulators in the diagnosis, prognosis and treatment of cancer. Semin. Cancer Biol. 43, 17–34 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Merino Salvador M., Gomez de Cedron M., Merino Rubio J., Falagan Martinez S., Sanchez Martinez R., Casado E. et al. (2017) Lipid metabolism and lung cancer. Crit. Rev. Oncol. Hematol. 112, 31–40 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Li J., Ren S., Piao H.L., Wang F., Yin P., Xu C. et al. (2016) Integration of lipidomics and transcriptomics unravels aberrant lipid metabolism and defines cholesteryl oleate as potential biomarker of prostate cancer. Sci. Rep. 6, 20984. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Karlic H., Thaler R., Gerner C., Grunt T., Proestling K., Haider F. et al. (2015) Inhibition of the mevalonate pathway affects epigenetic regulation in cancer cells. Cancer Genet. 208, 241–252 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Mullen P.J., Yu R., Longo J., Archer M.C. and Penn L.Z. (2016) The interplay between cell signalling and the mevalonate pathway in cancer. Nat. Rev. Cancer 16, 718–731 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Gustbee E., Tryggvadottir H., Markkula A., Simonsson M., Nodin B., Jirstrom K. et al. (2015) Tumor-specific expression of HMG-CoA reductase in a population-based cohort of breast cancer patients. BMC Clin. Pathol. 15, 8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Kim C.W., Moon Y.A., Park S.W., Cheng D., Kwon H.J. and Horton J.D. (2010) Induced polymerization of mammalian acetyl-CoA carboxylase by MIG12 provides a tertiary level of regulation of fatty acid synthesis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 107, 9626–9631 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Eberle D., Hegarty B., Bossard P., Ferre P. and Foufelle F. (2004) SREBP transcription factors: master regulators of lipid homeostasis. Biochimie 86, 839–848 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Hong C. and Tontonoz P. (2014) Liver X receptors in lipid metabolism: opportunities for drug discovery. Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 13, 433–444 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Iizuka K. (2017) The role of carbohydrate response element binding protein in intestinal and hepatic fructose metabolism. Nutrients 9, 2, 181–193 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Colbert C.L., Kim C.W., Moon Y.A., Henry L., Palnitkar M., McKean W.B. et al. (2010) Crystal structure of Spot 14, a modulator of fatty acid synthesis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 107, 18820–18825 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Park S., Hwang I.W., Makishima Y., Perales-Clemente E., Kato T., Niederlander N.J. et al. (2013) Spot14/Mig12 heterocomplex sequesters polymerization and restrains catalytic function of human acetyl-CoA carboxylase 2. J. Mol. Recognit. 26, 679–688 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Muz B., de la Puente P., Azab F. and Azab A.K. (2015) The role of hypoxia in cancer progression, angiogenesis, metastasis, and resistance to therapy. Hypoxia (Auckl.) 3, 83–92 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Masson N. and Ratcliffe P.J. (2014) Hypoxia signaling pathways in cancer metabolism: the importance of co-selecting interconnected physiological pathways. Cancer Metab. 2, 3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Rohrig F. and Schulze A. (2016) The multifaceted roles of fatty acid synthesis in cancer. Nat. Rev. Cancer 16, 732–749 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.O’Malley J., Kumar R., Kuzmin A.N., Pliss A., Yadav N., Balachandar S. et al. (2017) Lipid quantification by Raman microspectroscopy as a potential biomarker in prostate cancer. Cancer Lett. 397, 52–60 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Hilvo M., Denkert C., Lehtinen L., Muller B., Brockmoller S., Seppanen-Laakso T. et al. (2011) Novel theranostic opportunities offered by characterization of altered membrane lipid metabolism in breast cancer progression. Cancer Res. 71, 3236–3245 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Kuemmerle N.B., Rysman E., Lombardo P.S., Flanagan A.J., Lipe B.C., Wells W.A. et al. (2011) Lipoprotein lipase links dietary fat to solid tumor cell proliferation. Mol. Cancer Ther. 10, 427–436 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Pascual G., Avgustinova A., Mejetta S., Martín M., Castellanos A., Attolini C.S.-O. et al. (2017) Targeting metastasis-initiating cells through the fatty acid receptor CD36. Nature 541, 41–45 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Fontecha J., Rodríguez-Alcalá L.M., Calvo M.V. and Juárez M. (2011) Bioactive milk lipids. Curr. Nutr. Food Sci. 7, 155–159 [Google Scholar]
- 25.Mills S., Ross R.P., Hill C., Fitzgerald G.F. and Stanton C. (2011) Milk intelligence: mining milk for bioactive substances associated with human health. Int. Dairy J. 21, 377–401 [Google Scholar]
- 26.Kratz M., Baars T. and Guyenet S. (2013) The relationship between high-fat dairy consumption and obesity, cardiovascular, and metabolic disease. Eur. J. Nutr. 52, 1–24 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.van Aerde M.A., Soedamah-Muthu S.S., Geleijnse J.M., Snijder M.B., Nijpels G., Stehouwer C.D. et al. (2013) Dairy intake in relation to cardiovascular disease mortality and all-cause mortality: the Hoorn study. Eur. J. Nutr. 52, 609–616 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.German J.B. and Dillard C.J. (2006) Composition, structure and absorption of milk lipids: a source of energy, fat-soluble nutrients and bioactive molecules. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 46, 57–92 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Parodi P.W. (2009) Has the association between saturated fatty acids, serum cholesterol and coronary heart disease been over emphasized? Int. Dairy J. 19, 345–361 [Google Scholar]
- 30.Steijns J.M. (2008) Dairy products and health: focus on their constituents or on the matrix? Int. Dairy J. 18, 425–435 [Google Scholar]
- 31.Thorning T.K., Raben A., Tholstrup T., Soedamah-Muthu S.S., Givens I. and Astrup A. (2016) Milk and dairy products: good or bad for human health? An assessment of the totality of scientific evidence. Food Nutr. Res. 60, 32527. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Kullenberg D., Taylor L.A., Schneider M. and Massing U. (2012) Health effects of dietary phospholipids. Lipids Health Dis. 11, 3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Castro-Gomez P., Garcia-Serrano A., Visioli F. and Fontecha J. (2015) Relevance of dietary glycerophospholipids and sphingolipids to human health. Prostaglandins Leukot. Essent. Fatty Acids 101, 41–51 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Bhanot A., Sharma R. and Noolvi M.N. (2011) Natural sources as potential anti-cancer agents: a review. Int. J. Phytomed. 3, 09–26 [Google Scholar]
- 35.Contarini G. and Povolo M. (2013) Phospholipids in milk fat: composition, biological and technological significance, and analytical strategies. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 14, 2808–2831 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.El-Loly M.M. (2011) Composition, properties and nutritional aspects of milk fat globule membrane - a Review. Pol. J. Food Nutr. Sci. 61, 7–32 [Google Scholar]
- 37.Conway V., Gauthier S.F. and Pouliot Y. (2014) Buttermilk: much more than a source of milk phospholipids. Anim. Front. 4, 44–51 [Google Scholar]
- 38.Ambroziak A. and Cichosz G. (2013) Milk phospholipids as nutraceutic. Pol. Merkuriusz Lek. 34, 62–66 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.O’Keeffe M. and St-Onge M.-P. (2013) Saturated fat and cardiovascular disease: a review of current evidence. Curr. Cardiovasc. Risk Rep. 7, 154–162 [Google Scholar]
- 40.Ravnskov U. (2014) Lack of evidence that saturated fat causes cardiovascular disease. BMJ 348, g3205. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Hilmarsson H., Larusson L.V. and Thormar H. (2006) Virucidal effect of lipids on visna virus, a lentivirus related to HIV. Arch. Vir. 151, 1217–1224 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Thormar H. and Hilmarsson H. (2007) The role of microbicidal lipids in host defense against pathogens and their potential as therapeutic agents. Chem. Phys. Lipids. 150, 1–11 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.German J.B. (1999) Butyric acid: a role in cancer prevention. Nutr. Bull. 24, 203–209 [Google Scholar]
- 44.Parodi P.W., Springer US; (2006) Nutritional significance of milk lipids, Advanced Dairy Chemistry, 3rd ed [Google Scholar]
- 45.Sales-Campos H., Souza P.R., Peghini B.C., da Silva J.S. and Cardoso C.R. (2013) An overview of the modulatory effects of oleic acid in health and disease. Mini Rev. Med. Chem. 13, 201–210 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Mozaffarian D., Aro A. and Willett W.C. (2009) Health effects of trans-fatty acids: experimental and observational evidence. Eur. J. Clin. Nutr. 63, S5–S21 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Brouwer I.A., Wanders A.J. and Katan M.B. (2010) Effect of animal and industrial trans fatty acids on HDL and LDL cholesterol levels in humans – a quantitative review. PLoS ONE 5, e9434. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Wang Y., Jacome-Sosa M.M. and Proctor S.D. (2012) The role of ruminant trans fat as a potential nutraceutical in the prevention of cardiovascular disease. Food Res. Int. 46, 460–468 [Google Scholar]
- 49.Brouwer I.A., Wanders A.J. and Katan M.B. (2013) Trans fatty acids and cardiovascular health: research completed[quest]. Eur. J. Clin. Nutr. 67, 541–547 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Jutzeler van Wijlen R.P. and Colombani P.C. (2010) Grass-based ruminant production methods and human bioconversion of vaccenic acid with estimations of maximal dietary intake of conjugated linoleic acids. Int. Dairy J. 20, 433–448 [Google Scholar]
- 51.Ruxton C., Reed S.C., Simpson M. and Millington K. (2004) The health benefits of omega‐3 polyunsaturated fatty acids: a review of the evidence. J. Hum. Nutr. Diet 17, 449–459 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Soel S.M., Choi O.S., Bang M.H., Yoon Park J.H. and Kim W.K. (2007) Influence of conjugated linoleic acid isomers on the metastasis of colon cancer cells in vitro and in vivo. J. Nutr. Biochem. 18, 650–657 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Mitchell P.L. and McLeod R.S. (2008) Conjugated linoleic acid and atherosclerosis: studies in animal models. Biochem. Cell Biol. 86, 293–301 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Song H.J., Grant I., Rotondo D., Mohede I., Sattar N., Heys S.D. et al. (2005) Effect of CLA supplementation on immune function in young healthy volunteers. Eur. J. Clin. Nutr. 59, 508–517 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Brownbill R.A., Petrosian M. and Ilich J.Z. (2005) Association between dietary conjugated linoleic acid and bone mineral density in postmenopausal women. J. Am. Coll. Nutr. 24, 177–181 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Ryder J.W., Portocarrero C.P., Song X.M., Cui L., Yu M., Combatsiaris T. et al. (2001) Isomer-specific antidiabetic properties of conjugated linoleic acid. Improved glucose tolerance, skeletal muscle insulin action, and UCP-2 gene expression. Diabetes 50, 1149–1157 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Gaullier J.-M., Halse J., Hoye K., Kristiansen K., Fagertun H., Vik H. et al. (2004) Conjugated linoleic acid supplementation for 1 y reduces body fat mass in healthy overweight humans. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 79, 1118–1125 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Zhao W.S., Zhai J.J., Wang Y.H., Xie P.S., Yin X.J., Li L.X. et al. (2009) Conjugated linoleic acid supplementation enhances antihypertensive effect of ramipril in Chinese patients with obesity-related hypertension. Am. J. Hypertens. 22, 680–686 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Jensen R.G. (2002) The composition of bovine milk lipids: January 1995 to December 2000. J. Dairy Sci. 85, 295–350 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Gomez-Cortes P., Tyburczy C., Brenna J.T., Juarez M. and de la Fuente M.A. (2009) Characterization of cis-9 trans-11 trans-15 C18:3 in milk fat by GC and covalent adduct chemical ionization tandem MS. J. Lipid Res. 50, 2412–2420 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Roach J.A.G., Mossoba M.M., Yurawecz M.P. and Kramer J.K.G. (2002) Chromatographic separation and identification of conjugated linoleic acid isomers. Anal. Chim. Acta 465, 207–226 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Schmid A., Collomb M., Sieber R. and Bee G. (2006) Conjugated linoleic acid in meat and meat products: a review. Meat Sci. 73, 29–41 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Fritsche J., Rickert R., Steinhart H., Yurawecz M.P., Mossoba M.M., Sehat N. et al. (1999) Conjugated linoleic acid (CLA) isomers: formation, analysis, amounts in foods, and dietary intake. Eur. J. Lipid Sci. Technol. 101, 272–276 [Google Scholar]
- 64.Collomb M., Schmid A., Sieber R., Wechsler D. and Ryhanen E.-L. (2006) Conjugated linoleic acids in milk fat: Variation and physiological effects. Int. Dairy J. 16, 1347–1361 [Google Scholar]
- 65.Ha Y.L., Grimm N.K. and Pariza M.W. (1987) Anticarcinogens from fried ground beef: heat-altered derivatives of linoleic acid. Carcinogenesis 8, 1881–1887 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66.Benjamin S., Prakasan P., Sreedharan S., Wright A.-D. and Spener F. (2015) Pros and cons of CLA consumption: an insight from clinical evidences. Nutr. Metab. 12, 4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67.Knekt P., Järvinen R., Seppänen R., Pukkala E. and Aromaa A. (1996) Intake of dairy products and the risk of breast cancer. Br. J. Cancer 73, 687–691 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68.Aro A., Mannisto S., Salminen I., Ovaskainen M., Kataja V. and Uusitupa M. (2000) Inverse association between dietary and serum conjugated linoleic acid and risk of breast cancer in postmenopausal women. Nutr. Cancer 38, 151–157 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69.Larsson S., Bergkvist L. and Wolk A. (2005) High-fat dairy food and conjugated linoleic acid intakes in relation to colorectal cancer incidence in the Swedish Mammography Cohort. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 82, 894–900 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70.Chajès V., Lavillonnière F., Ferrari P., Jourdan M., Pinault M., Maillard V. et al. (2002) Conjugated linoleic acid content in breast adipose tissue is not associated with the relative risk of breast cancer in a population of French patients. Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev. 11, 672–673 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71.Chajès V., Lavillonnière F., Maillard V., Giraudeau B., Jourdan M., Sébédio J. et al. (2003) Conjugated linoleic acid content in breast adipose tissue of breast cancer patients and the risk of metastasis. Nutr. Cancer 45, 17–23 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72.Hoffmann K., Blaudszun J., Brunken C., Tauber R., Höpker W.-W. and Steinhart H. (2005) Distribution of conjugated linoleic acid in total and subcellular fractions from normal and cancerous parts of human testes. Mol. Nutr. Food Res. 49, 756–762 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 73.Wall R., Ross R.P., Fitzgerald G.F. and Stanton C. (2008) Microbial conjugated linoleic acid production - a novel probiotic trait? Food Sci. Technol. Bull. 4, 87–97 [Google Scholar]
- 74.Kwak H.-K., Kim O.H., Jung H. and Kim J.H. (2009) Effects of conjugated linoleic acid supplementation on inflammatory mediators and immunoglobulins in overweight Korean females. FASEB J. 23, 563–521 [Google Scholar]
- 75.Albers R., van der Wielen R.P.J., Brink E.J., Hendriks H.F.J., Dorovska-Taran V.N. and Mohede I.C.M. (2003) Effects of cis-9, trans-11 and trans-10, cis-12 conjugated linoleic acid (CLA) isomers on immune function in healthy men. Eur. J. Clin. Nutr. 57, 595–603 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 76.Olson J.M., Haas A.W., Lor J., McKee H.S. and Cook M.E. (2017) A comparison of the anti-inflammatory effects of cis-9, trans-11 conjugated linoleic acid to celecoxib in the collagen-induced arthritis model. Lipids 52, 151–159 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 77.Koronowicz A.A., Banks P., Master A., Domagala D., Piasna-Slupecka E., Drozdowska M. et al. (2017) Fatty acids of CLA-enriched egg yolks can induce transcriptional activation of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors in MCF-7 breast cancer cells. PPAR Res. 2017, 2865283. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 78.Bassaganya-Riera J., Reynolds K., Martino-Catt S., Cui Y., Hennighausen L., Gonzalez F. et al. (2004) Activation of PPAR gamma and delta by conjugated linoleic acid mediates protection from experimental inflammatory bowel disease. Gastroenterology 127, 777–791 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 79.McGowan M.M., Eisenberg B.L., Lewis L.D., Froehlich H.M., Wells W.A., Eastman A. et al. (2013) A proof of principle clinical trial to determine whether conjugated linoleic acid modulates the lipogenic pathway in human breast cancer tissue. Breast Cancer Res. Treat. 138, 175–183 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 80.Wellberg E.A., Rudolph M.C., Lewis A.S., Padilla-Just N., Jedlicka P. and Anderson S.M. (2014) Modulation of tumor fatty acids, through overexpression or loss of thyroid hormone responsive protein spot 14 is associated with altered growth and metastasis. Breast Cancer Res. 16, 481. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 81.Gómez-Cortés P., Bach A., Luna P., Juárez M. and de la Fuente M.A. (2009) Effects of extruded linseed supplementation on n-3 fatty acids and conjugated linoleic acid in milk and cheese from ewes. J. Dairy Sci. 92, 4122–4134 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 82.Rodríguez-Alcalá L.M., Castro-Gómez P., Felipe X., Noriega L. and Fontecha J. (2015) Effect of processing of cow milk by high pressures under conditions up to 900 MPa on the composition of neutral, polar lipids and fatty acids. LWT Food Sci. Technol. 62, 265–270 [Google Scholar]
- 83.Rodríguez-Alcalá L.M., Harte F. and Fontecha J. (2009) Fatty acid profile and CLA isomers content of cow, ewe and goat milks processed by high pressure homogenization. Innov. Food Sci. Emerg. Technol. 10, 32–36 [Google Scholar]
- 84.Santora J., Palmquist D. and Rorhrig K.L. (2000) Vaccenic acid is desaturated to conjugated linoleic acid in mice. J. Nutr. 130, 208. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 85.Corl B.A., Barbano D.M., Bauman D.E. and Ip C. (2003) cis-9, trans-11 CLA derived endogenously from trans-11 18:1 reduces cancer risk in rats. J. Nutr. 133, 2893–2900 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 86.Banni S., Angioni E., Murru E., Carta G., Paola Melis M., Bauman D. et al. (2001) Vaccenic acid feeding increases tissue levels of conjugated linoleic acid and suppresses development of premalignant lesions in rat mammary gland. Nutr. Cancer 41, 91–97 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 87.Oh J.-J., Lee J.-S., Lim J.-N., Wang T., Kim S.-H. and Lee H.-G. (2014) Trans vaccenic acid (trans-11 18:1), a precursor of cis-9, trans-11-conjugated linoleic acid, exerts a direct anti-carcinogenic function in T47D breast carcinoma cells. Food Sci. Biotechnol. 23, 641–646 [Google Scholar]
- 88.Qu D., Shen L., Liu S., Li H., Ma Y., Zhang R. et al. (2017) Chronic inflammation confers to the metabolic reprogramming associated with tumorigenesis of colorectal cancer. Cancer Biol. Ther. 18, 237–244 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 89.Da Silva M.S., Julien P., Bilodeau J.F., Barbier O. and Rudkowska I. (2017) Trans fatty acids suppress TNF-alpha-induced inflammatory gene expression in endothelial (HUVEC) and hepatocellular carcinoma (HepG2) cells. Lipids 52, 315–325 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 90.Chilliard Y., Glasser F., Ferlay A., Bernard L., Rouel J. and Doreau M. (2007) Diet, rumen biohydrogenation and nutritional quality of cow and goat milk fat. Eur. J. Lipid Sci. Technol. 109, 828–855 [Google Scholar]
- 91.Lerch S., Shingfield K.J., Ferlay A., Vanhatalo A. and Chilliard Y. (2012) Rapeseed or linseed in grass-based diets: effects on conjugated linoleic and conjugated linolenic acid isomers in milk fat from Holstein cows over 2 consecutive lactations. J. Dairy Sci. 95, 7269–7287 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 92.Plourde M., Destaillats F., Chouinard P.Y. and Angers P. (2007) Conjugated alpha-linolenic acid isomers in bovine milk and muscle. J. Dairy Sci. 90, 5269–5275 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 93.Ebrahimi M., Rajion M.A. and Goh Y.M. (2014) Effects of oils rich in linoleic and alpha-linolenic acids on fatty acid profile and gene expression in goat meat. Nutrients 6, 3913–3928 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 94.Mapiye C., Aalhus J.L., Turner T.D., Rolland D.C., Basarab J.a., Baron V.S. et al. (2013) Effects of feeding flaxseed or sunflower-seed in high-forage diets on beef production, quality and fatty acid composition. Meat Sci. 95, 98–109 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 95.Nassu R.T., Dugan M.E.R., He M.L., McAllister T.a., Aalhus J.L., Aldai N. et al. (2011) The effects of feeding flaxseed to beef cows given forage based diets on fatty acids of longissimus thoracis muscle and backfat. Meat Sci. 89, 469–477 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 96.Igarashi M. and Miyazawa T. (2000) Newly recognized cytotoxic effect of conjugated trienoic fatty acids on cultured human tumor cells. Cancer Lett. 148, 173–179 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 97.Yuan G.-F., Chen X.-E. and Li D. (2014) Conjugated linolenic acids and their bioactivities: a review. Food Funct. 5, 1360–1368 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 98.Yuan G.-F., Yuan J.-Q. and Li D. (2009) Punicic acid from Trichosanthes kirilowii seed oil is rapidly metabolized to conjugated linoleic acid in rats. J. Med. Food 12, 416–422 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 99.Villar-Tajadura M.A., Rodríguez-Alcalá L.M., Martín V., Segura A.G.d., Rodríguez J.M., Requena T. et al. (2014) Production of conjugated linoleic and conjugated alpha-linolenic acid in a reconstituted skim milk-based medium by bifidobacterial strains isolated from human breast milk. Biomed. Res. Int. 2014, 1–6 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 100.Gorissen L., Raes K., De Smet S., De Vuyst L. and Leroy F. (2012) Microbial production of conjugated linoleic and linolenic acids in fermented foods: technological bottlenecks. Eur. J. Lipid Sci. Technol. 114, 486–491 [Google Scholar]
- 101.Vlaeminck B., Fievez V., Cabrita A.R.J., Fonseca A.J.M. and Dewhurst R.J. (2006) Factors affecting odd- and branched-chain fatty acids in milk: a review. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 131, 389–417 [Google Scholar]
- 102.Croom W.J. Jr, Bauman D.E. and Davis C.L. (1981) Methylmalonic acid in low-fat milk syndrome. J. Dairy Sci. 64, 649–654 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 103.Jenkins B., West J. and Koulman A. (2015) A review of odd-chain fatty acid metabolism and the role of pentadecanoic Acid (C15:0) and heptadecanoic acid (C17:0) in health and disease. Molecules 20, 2425–2444 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 104.Verhoeven N.M., Wanders R.J.A., Poll-The B.T., Saudubray J.M. and Jakobs C. (1998) The metabolism of phytanic acid and pristanic acid in man: a review. J. Inherited Metab. Dis. 21, 697–728 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 105.Kataria Y., Wright M., Deaton R.J., Rueter E.E., Rybicki B.A., Moser A.B. et al. (2015) Dietary influences on tissue concentrations of phytanic acid and AMACR expression in the benign human prostate. Prostate 75, 200–210 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 106.Wright M.E., Albanes D., Moser A.B., Weinstein S.J., Snyder K., Männistö S. et al. (2014) Serum phytanic and pristanic acid levels and prostate cancer risk in Finnish smokers. Cancer Med. 3, 1562–1569 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 107.Hellgren L.I. (2010) Phytanic acid—an overlooked bioactive fatty acid in dairy fat? Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci. 1190, 42–49 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 108.Wongtangtintharn S., Oku H., Iwasaki H. and Toda T. (2004) Effect of branched-chain fatty acids on fatty acid biosynthesis of human breast cancer cells. J. Nutr. Sci. Vitaminol. 50, 137–143 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 109.Lin T., Yin X., Cai Q., Fan X., Xu K., Huang L. et al. (2012) 13-Methyltetradecanoic acid induces mitochondrial-mediated apoptosis in human bladder cancer cells. Urol. Oncol. 30, 339–345 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 110.Collins Y.F., McSweeney P.L.H. and Wilkinson M.G. (2003) Lipolysis and free fatty acid catabolism in cheese: a review of current knowledge. Int. Dairy J. 13, 841–866 [Google Scholar]
- 111.Narayanan A., Baskaran S.A., Amalaradjou M.A.R. and Venkitanarayanan K. (2015) Anticarcinogenic properties of medium chain fatty acids on human colorectal, skin and breast cancer cells in vitro. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 16, 5014–5027 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 112.Havenaar R. (2011) Intestinal health functions of colonic microbial metabolites: a review. Benef. Microbes 2, 103–114 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 113.Yasuda S., Ohkura N., Suzuki K., Yamasaki M., Nishiyama K., Kobayashi H. et al. (2010) Effects of highly ripened cheeses on HL-60 human leukemia cells: antiproliferative activity and induction of apoptotic DNA damage. J. Dairy Sci. 93, 1393–1400 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 114.Yasuda S., Kuwata H., Kawamoto K., Shirakawa J., Atobe S., Hoshi Y. et al. (2012) Effect of highly lipolyzed goat cheese on HL-60 human leukemia cells: antiproliferative activity and induction of apoptotic DNA damage. J. Dairy Sci. 95, 2248–2260 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 115.Rephaeli A., Nordenberg J., Aviram A., Rabizadeh E., Zimra Y., Nudelman A. et al. (1994) Butyrate-induced differentiation in leukemic myeloid cells - in-vitro and in-vivo studies. Int. J. Oncol. 4, 1387–1391 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 116.Egorin M.J., Yuan Z.M., Sentz D.L., Plaisance K. and Eiseman J.L. (1999) Plasma pharmacokinetics of butyrate after intravenous administration of sodium butyrate or oral administration of tributyrin or sodium butyrate to mice and rats. Cancer Chemother. Pharmacol. 43, 445–453 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 117.Heidor R., Furtado K.S., Ortega J.F., de Oliveira T.F., Tavares P.E.L.M., Vieira A. et al. (2014) The chemopreventive activity of the histone deacetylase inhibitor tributyrin in colon carcinogenesis involves the induction of apoptosis and reduction of DNA damage. Toxicol. Appl. Pharmacol. 276, 129–135 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 118.Guariento A.H., Furtado K.S., de Conti A., Campos A., Purgatto E., Carrilho J. et al. (2014) Transcriptomic responses provide a new mechanistic basis for the chemopreventive effects of folic acid and tributyrin in rat liver carcinogenesis. Int. J. Cancer 135, 7–18 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 119.Cohen I., Poreba E., Kamieniarz K. and Schneider R. (2011) Histone modifiers in cancer: friends or foes? Genes Cancer 2, 631–647 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 120.Singh B.N., Zhang G., Hwa Y.L., Li J., Dowdy S.C. and Jiang S.W. (2010) Nonhistone protein acetylation as cancer therapy targets. Expert Rev. Anticancer Ther. 10, 935–954 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 121.Zhao Z., Li S., Song E. and Liu S. (2016) The roles of ncRNAs and histone-modifiers in regulating breast cancer stem cells. Protein Cell 7, 89–99 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 122.Huffman K. and Martinez E.D. (2013) Pre-clinical studies of epigenetic therapies targeting histone modifiers in lung cancer. Front. Oncol. 3, 235. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 123.Bosch-Presegue L. and Vaquero A. (2011) The dual role of sirtuins in cancer. Genes Cancer 2, 648–662 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 124.Pant K., Yadav A.K., Gupta P., Islam R., Saraya A. and Venugopal S.K. (2017) Butyrate induces ROS-mediated apoptosis by modulating miR-22/SIRT-1 pathway in hepatic cancer cells. Redox Biol. 12, 340–349 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 125.Guo Z., Vikbjerg A.F. and Xu X. (2005) Enzymatic modification of phospholipids for functional applications and human nutrition. Biotechnol. Adv. 23, 203–259 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 126.Pettus B.J., Bielawska A., Subramanian P., Wijesinghe D.S., Maceyka M., Leslie C.C. et al. (2004) Ceramide 1-phosphate is a direct activator of cytosolic phospholipase A2. J. Biol. Chem. 279, 11320–11326 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 127.Weihrauch J. and Son Y.-S. (1983) Phospholipid content of foods. J. Am. Oil Chem. Soc. 60, 1971–1978 [Google Scholar]
- 128.Blesso C.N. (2015) Egg phospholipids and cardiovascular health. Nutrients 7, 2731–2747 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 129.John J.V., Park H., Lee H.R., Suh H. and Kim I. (2015) Simultaneous extraction of phosphatidylcholine and phosphatidylethanolamine from soybean lecithin. Eur. J. Lipid Sci. Technol. 117, 1647–1654 [Google Scholar]
- 130.Castro-Gómez M.P., Holgado F., Rodríguez-Alcalá L.M., Montero O. and Fontecha J. (2015) Comprehensive study of the lipid classes of krill oil by fractionation and identification of triacylglycerols, diacylglycerols, and phospholipid molecular species by using UPLC/QToF-MS. Food Anal. Methods 8, 2568–2580 [Google Scholar]
- 131.Cohn J., Kamili A., Wat E., Chung R.W. and Tandy S. (2010) Dietary phospholipids and intestinal cholesterol absorption. Nutrients 2, 116–127 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 132.Pimentel L., Gomes A., Pintado M. and Rodríguez-Alcalá L.M. (2016) Isolation and analysis of phospholipids in dairy foods. J. Anal. Methods Chem. 2016, 9827369. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 133.Danthine S., Blecker C., Paquot M., Innocente N. and Deroanne C. (2000) Évolution des connaissances sur la membrane du globule gras du lait: synthèse bibliographique. Lait 80, 209–222 [Google Scholar]
- 134.Evers J.M., Haverkamp R.G., Holroyd S.E., Jameson G.B., Mackenzie D.D.S. and McCarthy O.J. (2008) Heterogeneity of milk fat globule membrane structure and composition as observed using fluorescence microscopy techniques. Int. Dairy J. 18, 1081–1089 [Google Scholar]
- 135.Róg T. and Vattulainen I. (2014) Cholesterol, sphingolipids, and glycolipids: What do we know about their role in raft-like membranes? Chem. Phys. Lipids 184, 82–104 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 136.Lopez C., Madec M.-N. and Jimenez-Flores R. (2011) Lipid rafts in the bovine milk fat globule membrane revealed by the lateral segregation of phospholipids and heterogeneous distribution of glycoproteins. Food Chem. 120, 22–33 [Google Scholar]
- 137.Singh H. (2006) The milk fat globule membrane-a biophysical system for food applications. Curr. Opin. Colloid Interface Sci. 11, 154–163 [Google Scholar]
- 138.Conway V., Couture P., Richard C., Gauthier S.F., Pouliot Y. and Lamarche B. (2013) Impact of buttermilk consumption on plasma lipids and surrogate markers of cholesterol homeostasis in men and women. Nutr. Metab. Cardiovasc. Dis. 23, 1255–1262 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 139.Rosqvist F., Smedman A., Lindmark-Mansson H., Paulsson M., Petrus P., Straniero S. et al. (2015) Potential role of milk fat globule membrane in modulating plasma lipoproteins, gene expression, and cholesterol metabolism in humans: a randomized study. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 102, 20–30 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 140.Patwardhan G.A. and Liu Y.-Y. (2011) Sphingolipids and expression regulation of genes in cancer. Prog. Lipid Res. 50, 104–114 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 141.Oskouian B. and Saba J.D. (2010) Cancer treatment strategies targeting sphingolipid metabolism. Adv. Exp. Med. Biol. 688, 185–205 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 142.Dial E.J., Doyen J.R. and Lichtenberger L.M. (2006) Phosphatidylcholine-associated nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) inhibit DNA synthesis and the growth of colon cancer cells in vitro. Cancer Chemother. Pharmacol. 57, 295–300 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 143.Fukunaga K., Hossain Z. and Takahashi K. (2008) Marine phosphatidylcholine suppresses 1,2-dimethylhydrazine-induced colon carcinogenesis in rats by inducing apoptosis. Nutr. Res. 28, 635–640 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 144.Wijendran V., Huang M.C., Diau G.Y., Boehm G., Nathanielsz P.W. and Brenna J.T. (2002) Efficacy of dietary arachidonic acid provided as triglyceride or phospholipid as substrates for brain arachidonic acid accretion in baboon neonates. Pediatr. Res. 51, 265–272 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 145.Di Marzo V., Griinari M., Carta G., Murru E., Ligresti A., Cordeddu L. et al. (2010) Dietary krill oil increases docosahexaenoic acid and reduces 2-arachidonoylglycerol but not N-acylethanolamine levels in the brain of obese Zucker rats. Int. Dairy J. 20, 231–235 [Google Scholar]
- 146.Hossain Z., Hosokawa M. and Takahashi K. (2009) Growth inhibition and induction of apoptosis of colon cancer cell lines by applying marine phospholipid. Nutr. Cancer 61, 123–130 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 147.Snow D.R., Jimenez-Flores R., Ward R.E., Cambell J., Young M.J., Nemere I. et al. (2010) Dietary milk fat globule membrane reduces the incidence of aberrant crypt foci in Fischer-344 rats. J. Agric. Food Chem. 58, 2157–2163 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 148.Zanabria R., Tellez A.M., Griffiths M. and Corredig M. (2013) Milk fat globule membrane isolate induces apoptosis in HT-29 human colon cancer cells. Food Funct. 4, 222–230 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 149.Zanabria R., Tellez A.M., Griffiths M.W. and Corredig M. (2014) The antiproliferative properties of the milk fat globule membrane are affected by extensive heating. Dairy Sci. Technol. 94, 439–453 [Google Scholar]
- 150.Visioli F. and Strata A. (2014) Milk, dairy products, and their functional effects in humans: a narrative review of recent evidence. Adv. Nutr. 5, 131–143 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 151.Castro-Gómez P., Rodríguez-Alcalá L.M., Monteiro K.M., Ruiz A.L.T.G., Carvalho J.E. and Fontecha J. (2016) Antiproliferative activity of buttermilk lipid fractions isolated using food grade and non-food grade solvents on human cancer cell lines. Food Chem. 212, 695–702 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 152.Castro-Gómez P., Rodriguez-Alcalá L.M., Calvo M.V., Holgado F., Carvalho J.E. and Fontecha J. (2013) Antiproliferative activity of buttermilk milk fat globule membrane and isolated lipid fractions on ten human cancer cell lines. Ann. Nutr. Metab. 63, 1623 [Google Scholar]
- 153.Kuchta A.M., Kelly P.M., Stanton C. and Devery R.A. (2012) Milk fat globule membrane – a source of polar lipids for colon health? A review. Int. J. Dairy Techol. 65, 315–333 [Google Scholar]
- 154.Pralhada Rao R., Vaidyanathan N., Rengasamy M., Mammen Oommen A., Somaiya N. and Jagannath M.R. (2013) Sphingolipid metabolic pathway: an overview of major roles played in human diseases. J. Lipids 2013, 178910. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 155.Zhang P., Li B., Gao S. and Duan R.-D. (2008) Dietary sphingomyelin inhibits colonic tumorigenesis with an up-regulation of alkaline sphingomyelinase expression in ICR mice. Anticancer Res. 28, 3631–3635 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 156.Berra B., Colombo I., Sottocornola E. and Giacosa A. (2002) Dietary sphingolipids in colorectal cancer prevention. Eur. J. Cancer Prev. 11, 193–197 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 157.Lemonnier L.A., Dillehay D.L., Vespremi M.J., Abrams J., Brody E. and Schmelz E.M. (2003) Sphingomyelin in the suppression of colon tumors: prevention versus intervention. Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 419, 129–138 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 158.Schmelz E.M. (2004) Sphingolipids in the chemoprevention of colon cancer. Front. Biosci. 9, 2632–2639 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 159.Patwardhan G., Beverly L. and Siskind L. (2015) Sphingolipids and mitochondrial apoptosis. J. Bioenerg. Biomembr., 48, 2 1–16 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 160.Schmelz E.M., Dillehay D.L., Webb S.K., Reiter A., Adams J. and Merrill A.H. Jr (1996) Sphingomyelin consumption suppresses aberrant colonic crypt foci and increases the proportion of adenomas versus adenocarcinomas in CF1 mice treated with 1, 2-dimethylhydrazine: implications for dietary sphingolipids and colon carcinogenesis. Cancer Res. 56, 4936–4941 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 161.Morifuji M., Higashi S., Oba C., Ichikawa S., Kawahata K., Yamaji T. et al. (2015) Milk phospholipids enhance lymphatic absorption of dietary sphingomyelin in lymph-cannulated rats. Lipids 50, 987–996 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 162.Li Y.C., Park M.J., Ye S.-K., Kim C.-W. and Kim Y.-N. (2006) Elevated levels of cholesterol-rich lipid rafts in cancer cells are correlated with apoptosis sensitivity induced by cholesterol-depleting agents. Am. J. Pathol. 168, 1107–1118 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 163.Doria M.L., Cotrim C.Z., Simoes C., Macedo B., Domingues P., Domingues M.R. et al. (2013) Lipidomic analysis of phospholipids from human mammary epithelial and breast cancer cell lines. J. Cell. Physiol. 228, 457–468 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 164.Patel N., Vogel R., Chandra-Kuntal K., Glasgow W. and Kelavkar U. (2014) A novel three serum phospholipid panel differentiates normal individuals from those with prostate cancer. PLoS ONE 9, e88841. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 165.Dong J.-Y., Zhang L., He K. and Qin L.-Q. (2011) Dairy consumption and risk of breast cancer: a meta-analysis of prospective cohort studies. Breast Cancer Res. Treat. 127, 23–31 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 166.Parodi P.W. (2009) Dairy product consumption and the risk of prostate cancer. Int. Dairy J. 19, 551–565 [Google Scholar]
- 167.Abd El Baky H.H., El Baz F.K., El Baroty G.S., Asker M.S. and Ibrahim E.A. (2014) Phospholipids of some marine macroalgae: identification, antivirus, anticancer and antimicrobial bioactivities. Pharm. Chem. 6, 370–382 [Google Scholar]
- 168.Lamaziere A., Wolf C., Barbe U., Bausero P. and Visioli F. (2013) Lipidomics of hepatic lipogenesis inhibition by omega 3 fatty acids. Prostaglandins Leukot. Essent. Fatty Acids 88, 149–154 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 169.Sakakima Y., Hayakawa A., Nagasaka T. and Nakao A. (2007) Prevention of hepatocarcinogenesis with phosphatidylcholine and menaquinone-4: in vitro and in vivo experiments. J. Hepatol. 47, 83–92 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 170.Sakakima Y., Hayakawa A. and Nakao A. (2009) Phosphatidylcholine induces growth inhibition of hepatic cancer by apoptosis via death ligands. Hepatogastroenterology 56, 481–484 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 171.Wiegmann K., Schütze S., Machleidt T., Witte D. and Krönke M. (1994) Functional dichotomy of neutral and acidic sphingomyelinases in tumor necrosis factor signaling. Cell 78, 1005–1015 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 172.Dressler K.A., Mathias S. and Kolesnick R.N. (1992) Tumor necrosis factor-alpha activates the sphingomyelin signal transduction pathway in a cell-free system. Science 255, 1715–1718 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 173.Modrak D.E., Gold D.V. and Goldenberg D.M. (2006) Sphingolipid targets in cancer therapy. Mol. Cancer Ther. 5, 200–208 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 174.Modrak D.E., Cardillo T.M., Newsome G.A., Goldenberg D.M. and Gold D.V. (2004) Synergistic interaction between sphingomyelin and gemcitabine potentiates ceramide-mediated apoptosis in pancreatic cancer. Cancer Res. 64, 8405–8410 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 175.van Vlerken L.E., Duan Z., Seiden M.V. and Amiji M.M. (2007) Modulation of intracellular ceramide using polymeric nanoparticles to overcome multidrug resistance in cancer. Cancer Res. 67, 4843–4850 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 176.van Vlerken L., Duan Z., Little S., Seiden M. and Amiji M. (2010) Augmentation of therapeutic efficacy in drug-resistant tumor models using ceramide coadministration in temporal-controlled polymer-blend nanoparticle delivery systems. AAPS J. 12, 171–180 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 177.Sun Y., Lin L.-J., Sang L.-X., Dai C., Jiang M. and Zheng C.-Q. (2014) Dairy product consumption and gastric cancer risk: a meta-analysis. World J. Gastroenterol. 20, 15879–15898 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 178.Jansen M., Treutner K.-H., Schmitz B., Otto J., Jansen P., Neuss S. et al. (2004) Phospholipids reduce gastric cancer cell adhesion to extracellular matrix in vitro. BMC Gastroenterol. 4, 33. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 179.Jantscheff P., Schlesinger M., Fritzsche J., Taylor L.A., Graeser R., Kirfel G. et al. (2011) Lysophosphatidylcholine pretreatment reduces VLA-4 and P-selectin-mediated b16.f10 melanoma cell adhesion in vitro and inhibits metastasis-like lung invasion in vivo. Mol. Cancer Ther. 10, 186–197 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 180.Russell A., Laubscher A., Jimenez-Flores R. and Laiho L.H. (2010) Investigating the protective properties of milk phospholipids against ultraviolet light exposure in a skin equivalent model. Proc. SPIE, Multiphoton Microscopy in the Biomedical Sciences X, 7569, 75692Z [Google Scholar]
- 181.La Vecchia C. and Negri E. (1996) Nutrition and bladder cancer. Cancer Causes Control 7, 95–100 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 182.Mao Q.-Q., Dai Y., Lin Y.-W., Qin J., Xie L.-P. and Zheng X.-Y. (2011) Milk consumption and bladder cancer risk: a meta-analysis of published epidemiological studies. Nutr. Cancer 63, 1263–1271 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 183.Maswadeh H.M., Aljarbou A.N., Alorainy M.S., Alsharidah M.S. and Khan M.A. (2015) Etoposide incorporated into camel milk phospholipids liposomes shows increased activity against fibrosarcoma in a mouse model. Biomed. Res. Int. 2015, 743051. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 184.Munagala R., Aqil F., Jeyabalan J. and Gupta R.C. (2016) Bovine milk-derived exosomes for drug delivery. Cancer Lett. 371, 48–61 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 185.Alonso L., Fontecha J., Lozada L., Fraga M.J. and Juarez M. (1999) Fatty acid composition of caprine milk: major, branched-chain, and trans fatty acids. J. Dairy Sci. 82, 878–884 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 186.Goudjil H., Fontecha J., Luna P., De La Fuente M.A., Alonso L. and Juárez M. (2004) Quantitative characterization of unsaturated and trans fatty acids in ewe’s milk fat. Lait 84, 473–482 [Google Scholar]
- 187.Moate P.J., Chalupa W., Boston R.C. and Lean I.J. (2007) Milk fatty acids. I. Variation in the concentration of individual fatty acids in bovine milk. J. Dairy Sci. 90, 4730–4739 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 188.Fagan P. and Wijesundera C. (2004) Liquid chromatographic analysis of milk phospholipids with on-line pre-concentration. J. Chromatogr. A 1054, 241–249 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 189.Avalli A. and Contarini G. (2005) Determination of phospholipids in dairy products by SPE/HPLC/ELSD. J. Chromatogr. A 1071, 185–190 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 190.Rombaut R., Camp J.V. and Dewettinck K. (2006) Phospho- and sphingolipid distribution during processing of milk, butter and whey. Int. J. Food Sci. Technol. 41, 435–443 [Google Scholar]
- 191.Rombaut R., Dewettinck K. and Van Camp J. (2007) Phospho- and sphingolipid content of selected dairy products as determined by HPLC coupled to an evaporative light scattering detector (HPLC-ELSD). J. Food Compost. Anal. 20, 308–312 [Google Scholar]
- 192.Fong B.Y., Norris C.S. and MacGibbon A.K.H. (2007) Protein and lipid composition of bovine milk-fat-globule membrane. Int. Dairy J. 17, 275–288 [Google Scholar]
- 193.Fauquant C., Briard-Bion V., Leconte N., Guichardant M. and Michalski M.-C. (2007) Membrane phospholipids and sterols in microfiltered milk fat globules. Eur. J. Lipid Sci. Technol. 109, 1167–1173 [Google Scholar]
- 194.Lopez C., Briard-Bion V., Menard O., Rousseau F., Pradel P. and Besle J.M. (2008) Phospholipid, sphingolipid, and fatty acid compositions of the milk fat globule membrane are modified by diet. J. Agric. Food Chem. 56, 5226–5236 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 195.Sánchez-Juanes F., Alonso J.M., Zancada L. and Hueso P. (2009) Glycosphingolipids from bovine milk and milk fat globule membranes: a comparative study. Adhesion to enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli strains. Biol. Chem. 390, 31–40 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 196.Rodríguez-Alcalá L.M. and Fontecha J. (2010) Major lipid classes separation of buttermilk, and cows, goats and ewes milk by high performance liquid chromatography with an evaporative light scattering detector focused on the phospholipid fraction. J. Chromatogr. A 1217, 3063–3066 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 197.Gallier S., Gragson D., Cabral C., Jiménez-Flores R. and Everett D.W. (2010) Composition and fatty acid distribution of bovine milk phospholipids from processed milk products. J. Agric. Food Chem. 58, 10503–10511 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 198.Le T.T., Miocinovic J., Nguyen T.M., Rombaut R., van Camp J. and Dewettinck K. (2011) Improved solvent extraction procedure and high-performance liquid chromatography-evaporative light-scattering detector method for analysis of polar lipids from dairy materials. J. Agric. Food Chem. 59, 10407–10413 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 199.Garcia C., Lutz N.W., Confort-Gouny S., Cozzone P.J., Armand M. and Bernard M. (2012) Phospholipid fingerprints of milk from different mammalians determined by 31P NMR: towards specific interest in human health. Food Chem. 135, 1777–1783 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 200.Castro-Gomez M.P., Rodriguez-Alcala L.M., Calvo M.V., Romero J., Mendiola J.A., Ibanez E. et al. (2014) Total milk fat extraction and quantification of polar and neutral lipids of cow, goat, and ewe milk by using pressurized liquid system and chromatographic techniques. J. Dairy Sci. 97, 6719–6728 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]