Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2020 Feb 1.
Published in final edited form as: Curr Opin Biotechnol. 2018 Aug 13;55:30–35. doi: 10.1016/j.copbio.2018.08.001

Table 1:

Comparison of established DNA adduct detection methods with reviewed emerging fluorescence-based methods.

Established methods Maximum Sensitivity Total DNA required (μg) Citations
HPLC-ECD/fluorescence 1 in 108 1–100 [1,2]
Immunoassay 1 in 108 1–200 [1,2]
Radio labeled compounds 1 in 108 1–100 [1,2]
32P-post-labelling 1 in 1010 1–10 [1,2]
LC-MS and GC-MS 1 in 108 1–100 [2,7]
AMS 1 in 1012 1–2000 [1,2]
Emerging methods Maximum Sensitivity Total DNA required (μg) Citations
Strand break reporter 1 in 105* NA [19,23]
In vitro RADD 1 in 105* 0.1–1 [2730]
In vivo RADD ND NA [31]
Fluorescent modifiers ND 0.1–1 [42,44]
*

estimated from Mbp measurements