Skip to main content
. 2018 Oct 10;38(9):1489–1507. doi: 10.1038/s41388-018-0532-5

Table1.

Univariate and multivariate analysis of different prognostic parameters for GC patients

Variables HR(95%CI) P value
Univariate analysis
Gender (M vs F)a 1.440(0.975–2.128) 0.067
Age(years)(<60 vs ≥60) 0. 955(0.643–1.418) 0.818
Location (C/B vs A/W)b 0.826(0.556–1.228) 0.345
Tumor size (cm in diameter)(>5.5 vs ≤5.5) 1.707(1.127–1.945) 0.007
Vascular invasion (yes vs no) 1.481(0.671–2.155) 0.005
Histological stage (P/U vs W/M)c 2.121(1.259–3.573) 0.005
AJCC stage (I/II vs III/IV) 4.559(2.845–7.306) <0.001
T stage (T1/T2 vs T3/T4) 3.632(1.761–7.492) <0.001
N stage (N0 vs N1~ 3) 3.992(2.224–7.166) <0.001
M stage (M0 vs M1) 2.613(1.379–4.952) 0.003
Hsp90ab1 expression (low vs high) 2.525(1.457–4.377) 0.001
Multivariate analysis
AJCC stage (I/II vs III/IV) 4.166(2.573–6.746) <0.001
Vascular invasion (yes vs no) 1.524(1.177–1.974) 0.001
Hsp90ab1 expression (low vs high) 1.983(1.130–3.478) 0.017

HR hazard ratio, CI confidence interval

*Statistically significant (P < 0.05)

aM male, F female

bC cardia, B body, A antrum, W whole

cP poor, U undifferentiated, W well, M moderate