Skip to main content
. 2019 Feb 6;6:11. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2019.00011

Table 3.

Pearson's correlation coefficients for the study variables.

Empowerment Usefulness Success Interest Caring Effort
Usefulness 0.21, 0.14, 0.35
Success 0.43, 0.38, 0.42 0.30, 0.40, 0.11
Interest 0.40, 0.39, 0.48 0.56+, 0.56+, 0.79+ 0.50+, 0.56+, 0.13
Caring 0.40, 0.30, 0.53+ 0.36, 0.49, 0.38 0.40, 0.51+, 0.46 0.47, 0.53+, 0.49
Effort , , 0.23, 0.24, 0.44 −0.10, 0.12, −0.20 0.15, 0.26, 0.45 , 0.22, 0.18
Rating 0.28, 0.13, 0.43 0.30, 0.34, 0.60+ 0.40, 0.48, 0.20 0.49, 0.43, 0.68+ 0.41, 0.35, 0.44 , , 0.30

The three numbers in each cell are the correlation coefficients from three different analyses: sample 1 (n = 208), sample 2 (n = 170), and sample 3 (n = 200). Cohen's (25) criteria is indicated as follows: bold numbers with the “+” indicate a large effect size (0.50 or greater), bold numbers without the “+” indicate a medium effect size (0.30 to 0.49), and numbers not in bold indicate a small effect size (0.10 to 0.29). Statistically insignificant values are not included in the table and are represented as “.