Skip to main content
. 2019 Feb 6;10:148. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2019.00148

Table 1.

A comparison of current protocols for ex vivo generated tDC and Treg and their clinical application.

Cell source PBMC PBMC PBMC PBMC PBMC Umbilical cord blood PBMC
Target cell DC DC DC DC Treg Treg Treg/Tr1
Cell generation GM-CSF+ IL-4 & Anti-sense CD40, CD80, CD86 GM-CSF+ IL-4 & BAY 11-7082 Auto-antigens GM-CSF+ IL-4 & Dex Vitamin D3 MPLA GM-CSF+ IL-4 & Dex Vitamin A Cytokines IL-2 Anti-CD3 & CD28 Beads IL-2 Anti-CD3 & CD28 Beads IL-2 IL-4 Anti-CD3 antibody Ovalbumin
Added auto-antigens No Yes No Yes No No No
Ex vivo Cell characterization Low CD40 CD80 CD86 IL-12 Low CD40 CD80 Low CD83 IL-12 High CD86 IL-10 Low CD83 IL-12 High CD80 CD86 IL-10 Low CD127 High CD25 Foxp3 Low CD127 IL-2 IFNγ High CD25 Foxp3 CD39 Low CD62L CD127 IL-4 IFNγ High Foxp3 CD25+ IL-10 IL-13
In vivo application Increased Foxp3 Tregs IL-10 Bregs IL-4 IL-10 No Change DC Increased Foxp3 Tregs Decreased IL-15 IL-29 No Change Foxp3 Treg Increased Foxp3 Tregs Increased Foxp3 Tregs Not Examined DC X X

A brief listing of reported cellular characteristics of generated cells are shown, but have not been uniformly examined across all studies. Post-administration changes in cell populations and plasma cytokines in vivo, in patients, are listed. Increased Treg numbers are reported in a majority of trials that utilize either ex vivo generated autologous tDC or Treg. Techniques marked as “X” are in clinical trials but have only been published under conditions with pre-clinical settings.