Skip to main content
. 2018 Nov 12;44(4):793–804. doi: 10.1038/s41386-018-0271-x

Fig. 5.

Fig. 5

Combining optogenetic stimulation of 5-HT terminals in the nucleus accumbens (NAc) with 5 mg/kg citalopram treatment does not alter operant responding for saccharin. a Schematic for optogenetic stimulation of 5-HT terminals in the NAc (5 mW, 10 ms pulses, 5 Hz) applied throughout tests of responding for saccharin in ChR2− mice (n = 8, white symbols) and ChR2+ mice (n = 8, green symbols). DRN, dorsal raphe nucleus; MRN, median raphe nucleus (MRN presented for completeness, weight of lines illustrates differential contribution of 5-HT inputs from DRN and MRN). b Photostimulation alone did not alter responding for saccharin in ChR2 + mice at any frequency tested. Responding was not different between photostimulation sessions (blue shaded area) and sessions without photostimulation (“OFF”; ANOVAs across all OFF–ON–OFF periods: F(1,15) < 0.25, p > 0.325). c Combining photostimulation of 5-HT terminals in the NAc with citalopram treatment did not differentially affect responding for saccharin across time in ChR2− mice (left panels; Laser × Citalopram × Time: F(3,21) = 0.26, ns) and ChR2+ mice (right panels; Laser × Citalopram × Time: F(3,21) = 0.68, ns). d Average (±SEM, shaded area) cumulative response rate plots for the first 10 min of test sessions from ChR2+ mice treated with citalopram alone (top) or citalopram combined with photostimulation (bottom). Locomotor activity was unaffected by citalopram alone (e; Group × Citalopram: F(1,14) = 0.34, ns; Citalopram: F(1,14) = 0.857, ns) or the combination of citalopram and photostimulation (f; Group × Citalopram × Time: F(3,42) = 0.93, ns; Group × Citalopram: F(1,14) = 0.02, ns). Data are expressed as mean (±SEM)