Skip to main content
. 2019 Jan 10;12(2):333–350. doi: 10.1016/j.stemcr.2018.12.004

Figure 5.

Figure 5

The Open Chromatin Landscape, Growth, and Pluripotency Exit Delay of XX ESCs Are Maintained in the Presence of Male-like Global DNA Methylation

(A) Scheme of Dusp9 heterozygous deletion in XX ESCs followed by LIF withdrawal differentiation. KO, knockout; WT, wild-type.

(B) (i) Western blot analysis for DUSP9 in Dusp9+/− ESCs, Dusp9+/+ ESCs, and XY ESCs grown in S/L. (ii) Quantification of DUSP9 levels using actin as a loading control (n = 2).

(C) PCA of stem cell maintenance genes (RNA-seq data) for the Dusp9+/−, Dusp9+/+, and XY ESCs grown in S/L conditions.

(D) Unsupervised hierarchical clustering of stem cell maintenance genes for the Dusp9+/−, Dusp9+/+, and XY ESCs.

(E) As in (D) for MAPK pathway-related genes (defined in Schulz et al., 2014).

(F) DEG analysis, identifying clear differences between Dusp9+/+ XX and XY ESCs, but much less between Dusp9+/− XX and Dusp9+/+ XX ESCs.

(G) Overlap between the DEGs of Dusp9+/+ versus XY ESCs and Dusp9+/− versus Dusp9+/+ ESCs for upregulated genes (up) and downregulated genes (down). Dusp9 heterozygous deletion maintains a female-like transcriptome.

(H) ATAC-seq sample-to-sample distance heatmap in Dusp9+/+, Dusp9+/−, and XY ESCs. Dusp9+/− ESCs maintain a Dusp9+/+-like open chromatin landscape.

(I) Differential chromatin accessibility analysis between Dusp9 heterozygous mutant and wild-type XX ESCs. Log2 fold change (mutant/wild-type) in reads per accessible region are plotted against the mean reads per ATAC-seq peak. Dusp9 heterozygous mutants maintain a female-like open chromatin landscape.

(J) Growth curves and doubling times of Dusp9+/−, Dusp9+/+, and XY ESCs in S/L condition. Cells were counted at the indicated time points and presented as fold changes relative to day 0, averages (±SEM) of biological duplicates. Data from a representative experiment from at least 4 independent experiments.

(K) qRT-PCR for Prdm14, Nanog, Tcl1, and Dusp9 expression before and after LIF withdrawal (n = 3).

See also Figure S5.