Skip to main content
. 2019 Feb 13;2019(2):CD003999. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003999.pub5
Methods Setting: quit smoking clinics, Malaysia
Recruitment: eligible clinic attendees
Participants 231 smokers, 120 in phone support arm and 111 in control
96.1% male, average age: 48, average cigarettes/day: 14
Interventions 1. Relapse prevention: as control with an additional phone call after each visit in month 1 providing information, encouragement, etc.
2. Control: attend quit smoking clinic 4 times in month 1, 2 times in month 2 with a phone call after each visit, and 1 visit with 2 phone calls in month 3, self‐help materials throughout
Outcomes Point prevalence abstinence at 6 months
Validation: CO ≥ 7 ppm at 6 months
Notes Dropouts counted as continuing smokers
Funding not declared
Declaration of Interests: "The authors declare that they have no competing interests."
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Low risk Assignments created by Urn design
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Unclear risk No information on concealment
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) All outcomes Unclear risk No information on blinding
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) All outcomes Low risk Biochemically validated abstinence
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes Low risk Low dropout rate at 6 months