Skip to main content
. 2018 Aug 22;27(3):1059–1070. doi: 10.1007/s00520-018-4395-7

Table 4.

Characteristics of study participants and decision approach type

Age range (years) Gender Education Race and ethnicity Relationship status Annual household income ($) Decision approach type
P1 50–60 M Some college Non-Hispanic White Divorced/separated 60–80k Active insider
P2 60–70 M H.S. degree Non-Hispanic White and American Indian Married/partnered 60–80k Reliant outsider
P3 40–50 F Some college Non-Hispanic White Married/partnered 40–60k Active insider
P4 60–70 F Adv. degree Non-Hispanic White Married/partnered 80–100k Active insider
P5 60–70 M Assoc. degree Non-Hispanic White Married/partnered 40–60k Reliant outsider
P6 70–80 M Adv. degree Non-Hispanic White Married/partnered 100k+ Active insider
P7 50–60 M Assoc. degree Non-Hispanic White Married/partnered [missing] Reliant outsider
P8 30–40 F H.S. degree Non-Hispanic White Divorced/separated 40–60k Active insider
P9 70–80 F Assoc. degree White [ethnicity missing] Divorced/separated 100k+ Active insider
P10 70–80 F H.S. degree Non-Hispanic White Married/partnered [missing] Reliant outsider
P11 50–60 F H.S. degree Non-Hispanic White Married/partnered 40–60k Active insider
P12 60–70 M Adv. degree Non-Hispanic White Married/partnered 100k+ Active insider
P13 40–50 M Some college Non-Hispanic White Married/partnered 60–80k Reliant outsider

F female, M male, Adv. advanced, Assoc. associates, H.S. high school