Table 1.
Subjective evaluation questionnaire (1-strongly disagree, 5-strongly agree) and feedback results. p-values obtained via an independent-samples t test performed between groups of PGY1 and PGY3&4 residents
| Survey Questionnaire for Medical Imaging | Feedback results | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PGY year: 1/2/3/4 | Gender: Male/Female | Group type: 2D/3D | Mean scores | P* | ||
| PGY1 | PGY2 | PGY3&4 | ||||
| Anatomy and imaging training | ||||||
| Learning approaches | 1.1 A.Atlas of anatomy B.Textbooks C.Reference D.Lectures E.Videos F.3D form G.Other | – | – | – | – | |
| Learning difficulty | 1.2 It is hard to learn anatomy | 4.65 | 4.26 | 3.78 | <0.001 | |
| 1.3 It is hard to learn imaging reasoning | 4.53 | 4.30 | 3.81 | <0.001 | ||
| Value for career | 1.4 It is crucial to strengthen anatomy and imaging learning for a future surgical career. | 4.00 | 4.26 | 4.19 | 0.43 | |
| 3D training | ||||||
| Simplification | 2.1 3D images make complex anatomy easier. | 3.88 | 3.96 | 4.11 | 0.37 | |
| Enjoyment | 2.2 3D images arouse my interest in anatomy learning. | 4.00 | 4.00 | 4.15 | 0.59 | |
| 2.3 3D images arouse my interest in imaging learning. | 4.06 | 4.00 | 4.19 | 0.50 | ||
| Intention to introduce | 2.4 It is necessary to combine 3D images with 2D learning during the beginning of the residency. | 4.41 | 4.26 | 4.30 | 0.44 | |
| Suggestions | 2.5 What do you think about the 3D training? Any suggestions for future improvement? (free form) | – | – | – | – | |