Skip to main content
. 2017 Dec 8;57(1):17–29. doi: 10.1007/s00411-017-0722-5

Table 1.

For both detrimental health outcomes (mortality from CeVD and heart diseases) the final non-nested models that are included into Occam’s group are shown with their final deviances (dev), difference in final deviances (Δdev) with respect to the model with the smallest final deviance, number of model parameters (N par), AIC-values, difference in AIC-values (ΔAIC) with respect to the model with the smallest AIC-value, and AIC-weights

dev Δdev N par AIC ΔAIC AIC-weight
CeVD (ICD-9 430–438)
 Streamlined baseline model 13,422.27 15 13,452.27
 ERR-LNT model 13,417.53 3.38 16 13,449.53 1.76 0.2412
 ERR-Q model 13,415.77 1.61 16 13,447.77 0 0.5823
 ERR-two-line spline model, D th = 0.14 Gy 13,414.15 0 18 13,450.15 2.39 0.1765
Heart diseases (ICD-9 393–429, excluding 401, 403, 405)
 Streamlined baseline model 13,163.17 20 13,203.17
 ERR-LNT model 13,152.52 1.29 21 13,194.52 0 0.3089
 ERR-Q model 13,154.54 3.32 21 13,196.54 2.02 0.1123
 ERR-smooth step model, D th = 1.52 Gy 13,153.66 2.44 23 13,199.66 5.14 0.0236b
 EAR-LNT modela 13,151.22 0 22 13,195.22 0.71 0.2171
 EAR-Q modela 13,151.78 0.55 22 13,195.78 1.26 0.1647
 EAR-LTH model, D th = 2.36 Gy 13,152.29 1.07 22 13,196.29 1.78 0.1271
 EAR-smooth step model, D th = 2.54 Gy 13,152.31 1.09 23 13,198.31 3.79 0.0464b

The Akaike Information Criterion is denoted by AIC (AIC = dev + 2 × N par). For CeVD, the deviance related to MMI is 13,415.46. As a comparison, the results from fitting the streamlined baseline models are also provided

aContains an age-dependent dose–effect modifier

bSee Online Resource, page 10, for an explanation why for heart diseases models with AIC-weights < 0.05 were included into the set of non-nested models that was used for MMI