Skip to main content
. 2018 Dec 3;81(3):759–799. doi: 10.1007/s11538-018-0535-y

Table 1.

List of the various parameter values studied in our systematic study

Name Kinetics Parameters T Static behavior
S1 Schnakenberg a=0.05,b=1.5,δ2=100 5000 Spots
S2 Schnakenberg a=0.05,b=1.6,δ2=20 60,000 Labyrinthine
GM1 Gierer–Meinhardt a=0.8,b=5.5,δ2=100 13,000 Large spots
GM2 Gierer–Meinhardt a=1.5,b=3,δ2=300 13,000 Small spots
FHN1 FitzHugh–Nagumo a=0.8,b=0.4,δ2=100 2000 Spots
FHN2 FitzHugh–Nagumo a=0.6,b=0.99,δ2=50 8000 Labyrinthine

In all cases, we took δ1=1 and for FitzHugh–Nagumo kinetics took c=1 and d=0.6. For Schnakenberg and Gierer–Meinhardt on both domains, and FitzHugh–Nagumo on the ellipsoidal domain, the initial manifold was always taken with r0=10 and the growth was to a maximum of rT=4r0, whereas for FitzHugh–Nagumo on the planar ellipse we used r0=25 and the growth to a maximum of rT=4r0