Skip to main content
. 2019 Jan 22;2019(1):CD009363. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009363.pub3
Study Reason for exclusion
ACTRN12610000948099 The registration for the RCT was withdrawn in February 2016. We did not identify the other trial registration.
Bernstein 2007 Design of study not relevant: letter
Bohme 2011 Design of study not relevant: not a RCT or quasi‐RCT
Bravo 2009 Design of study not relevant: narrative review
Dugar 2013 Participants of study not relevant: a quasi‐RCT that also included participants with medial and lateral third clavicle fractures (16.6%) and did not report results separately
Jones 2014 Design of study not relevant: not a RCT or quasi‐RCT: treatment method was based on surgeon choice
Jubel 2002 Design of study not relevant: retrospective comparative study
Jubel 2005 Design of study not relevant: not a RCT or quasi‐RCT ‐ participants could choose the intervention
Khorami 2014 Design of study not relevant: not a RCT or quasi‐RCT ‐ participants could choose the intervention
Kulshrestha 2011 Design of study not relevant: not a RCT or quasi‐RCT ‐ participants could choose the intervention
Madhukar 2015 Design of study not relevant: retrospective comparative study
Malkoc 2016 Design of study not relevant: retrospective comparative study
McIntosh 2016 Design of study not relevant: narrative review
McKee 2010b Design of study not relevant: narrative review
NCT00642265 This study, which was registered in the ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT00642265, was listed as an ongoing trial in the 1st version of the review. It planned to compare osteosynthesis versus sling, with a start date of April 2008 and end date July 2015. However, the contact author reported that for a variety of reasons the trial was ended and no data are available.
NCT01311219 The registration for a multicentre trial was withdrawn before enrolment because it is "a duplicate study". We did not identify the other trial registration.
Parry 2017 Design of study not relevant: retrospective comparative study
Shukla 2014 Design of study not relevant: case control study
Simon 2010 Design of study not relevant: narrative review
Smekal 2011 Design of study not relevant: not a RCT or quasi‐RCT

RCT: randomised controlled trial