Skip to main content
. 2017 Feb 8;2017(2):CD011747. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011747.pub2

ERICA 2006.

Methods Study design: parallel‐group trial
Total study duration: 9 weeks; recruitment from July 30, 2004 to February 16, 2005
Duration of follow‐up: no follow‐up beyond treatment phase
Method of randomisation: randomisation in a 1:1 ratio, centralised and not stratified by centre
Method of concealment of allocation: not mentioned
Blinding: double‐blind, not described
Power calculation: not mentioned
Phases of the study: 2 (qualifying phase, treatment phase), treatment phase made up by 1‐week run‐in phase and 6‐week full‐dose treatment phase
Number of patients randomised: 565 (284/281 for placebo/ranolazine group)
Exclusions post‐randomisation: run‐in phase: 1 withdrawal before study drug treatment (placebo group), 3 exclusions from placebo group because not beginning full‐dose treatment phase, 4 exclusions from ranolazine group, 1 because not beginning full‐dose treatment phase, 3 because not having any diary data in the full‐dose treatment phase
Withdrawals (and reasons): ranolazine group (3 adverse events, 1 death, 3 withdrew consent), placebo group (5 adverse events (4 according to the text), 1 death)
Participants Total number: 564
Country of enrolment: Eastern Europe, United States, Canada
Setting/location: not specified
Diagnostic criteria (stable angina pectoris): history of chronic stable angina ≥3 months, documented history of CAD (macrovascular angina)
Comorbidities: none
Age (mean ± SD): 61.3±9.0 / 62.0±8.7 for placebo / ranolazine group
Gender (male %): 73% / 72% for placebo / ranolazine group
Inclusion criteria:
  • Age ≥ 18 years

  • Chronic stable angina ≥ 3 months, and ≥ 3 episodes of angina per week during a ≥2‐week qualification period despite treatment with 10 mg/day amlodipine

  • Documented history of CAD (angiographic evidence of ≥ 60% stenosis of at least 1 major coronary artery, history of previous myocardial infarction and/or a stress‐induced reversible perfusion defect identified by radionuclide or echocardiographic imaging)


Exclusion criteria:
  • NYHA functional class IV congestive heart failure

  • History of myocardial infarction or unstable angina within the previous 2 months

  • Active acute myocarditis, pericarditis, hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, or uncontrolled hypertension

  • History of torsades de pointes

  • Receiving agents known to prolong the QTc interval

  • QTc interval measurement > 500 ms at study entry

  • Clinically significant hepatic disease, creatinine clearance < 30 mL/min, or chronic illness likely to interfere with protocol compliance

Interventions Number of intervention groups: 2
Concomitant medications: amlodipine 10 mg/day; LANs and sublingual nitroglycerin as required
Excluded medications: inhibitors of cytochrome P450‐3A4, digitalis preparation, perhexiline, trimetazidine, beta‐blockers, calcium cannel blockers other than amlodipine
Placebo group
  • Intervention: placebo

  • Duration of intervention: 6 weeks (full‐dose treatment phase)


Ranolazine group
  • Intervention: ranolazine ER 1000 mg twice daily

  • Duration of intervention: 6 weeks (full‐dose treatment phase)

Outcomes Total number of outcomes:
  • According to study protocol: no published protocol (registered data in clinicaltrials.gov is not available any more); according to the "Methods" section: 7 (average weekly frequency of self‐reported angina episodes, average weekly nitroglycerin consumption, change from baseline of the 5 dimensions of the Seattle Angina Questionnaire (SAQ), reported adverse events, haemodynamics, routine clinical laboratory measures, 12‐lead electrocardiograms)

  • Reported: 7


All‐cause mortality
  • Outcome definition: number of deaths

  • Method and unit of measurement: absolute frequency

  • Time points reported: 9 weeks


Quality of life
  • Outcome definition: change from baseline of the 5 dimensions of the Seattle Angina Questionnaire (SAQ), reported separately

  • Upper and lower limits and whether a high or low score is good: each dimension (anginal frequency, physical limitation, anginal stability, disease perception, and treatment satisfaction) was scored on a scale of 0 to 100

  • Method and unit of measurement: score difference

  • Time points reported: 6 weeks


Acute myocardial infarction incidence (fatal and non‐fatal)
  • Outcome definition: not described

  • Method and unit of measurement: percentage

  • Time points reported: 9 weeks


Angina episodes frequency
  • Outcome definition: average weekly angina episodes frequency

  • Method and unit of measurement: number per week

  • Time points reported: 6 weeks


Adverse events incidence
  • Outcome definition: number of patients that reported any adverse event

  • Method and unit of measurement: percentage

  • Time points reported: 9 weeks


RESULTS
All‐cause mortality
  • Sample size: 565 (Intention‐to‐treat analysis)

  • Missing participants: none

  • Summary data: 1/284‐1/281 for placebo‐ranolazine group

  • Subgroup analyses: not performed


Quality of life
  • Sample size: 558 (Intention‐to‐treat analysis)

  • Missing participants: 7 (3 from placebo group, 4 from ranolazine group)

  • Summary data: SAQ dimension 1 (anginal frequency) 22.5 ± 19.0/18.5 ± 18.8 for ranolazine/placebo group

  • Subgroup analyses: significant improvement of SAQ anginal frequency only for patients with baseline angina frequency > 4.5 per week


Acute myocardial infarction incidence (fatal and non‐fatal)
  • Sample size: 565 (Intention‐to‐treat analysis)

  • Missing participants: none

  • Summary data: 0.7%/0.4% for placebo/ranolazine group

  • Subgroup analyses: not performed


Angina episodes frequency
  • Sample size: 558 (intention‐to‐treat analysis)

  • Missing participants: 7 (3 from placebo group, 4 from ranolazine group)

  • Summary data: arithmetic means ± SE: 4.3 ± 0.64/3.29 ± 0.26 for placebo/ranolazine group; trimmed means ± SE: 3.31 ± 0.22/2.88 ± 0.19 for placebo/ranolazine group

  • Subgroup analyses: significant reductions of angina frequency for patients with baseline angina frequency > 4.5 per week and for ≤ 4.5 per week


Adverse events incidence
  • Sample size: 565 (Intention‐to‐treat analysis)

  • Missing participants: none

  • Summary data: 35.3%/39.9% for placebo/ranolazine group. The most frequently reported adverse events in the ranolazine group were constipation (25/281), peripheral edema (16/281), dizziness (11/281), nausea (8/281) and headache (8/281); in the placebo group were peripheral edema (8/284), dizziness (7/284), headache (7/284), constipation (5/284) and nausea (2/284).

  • Subgroup analyses: performed for the following variables: long acting nitrates (LAN) user state, gender, age

Notes Relevant observations for the data provided before: given that 4 placebo patients and 3 ranolazine patients discontinued the study because of adverse events but 5 placebo patients are reported not to have terminated the trial because of adverse events and 3 more ranolazine patients are reported not to have terminated the trial because of withdrawing consent, it is not clear which patients were finally included in the efficacy analysis
Source of funding: CV Therapeutics
Notable conflicts of interest: all the authors have received some kind of reward or support for participating in this trial from several pharmaceutical companies
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Unclear risk Randomisation is stated but described only as "in a 1:1 ratio, centralized but not stratified"
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Unclear risk Not mentioned
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) 
 All outcomes Unclear risk Treatment phase is declared to be double‐blinded, but not description is provided
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) 
 All outcomes Unclear risk Treatment phase is declared to be double‐blinded, but not description is provided
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) 
 All outcomes Low risk Patients who did not complete the trial are described clearly, however, there is an inconsistency in the data provided for terminating patients in the placebo group for only one case and it is not clear which patients were finally included in the efficacy analysis
Selective reporting (reporting bias) Unclear risk There is no published protocol. Results for all the outcomes mentioned in the "Methods" section of the paper are reported
Other bias High risk The study was supported by CV Therapeutics Inc. All the authors have received some kind of reward or support for participating in this trial from several pharmaceutical companies