Skip to main content
. 2018 Sep 3;35(1):33–42. doi: 10.1002/joa3.12115

Table 3.

Summary estimates of relative risks and mean differences for all outcomes of AFA vs controls

Summary estimates Relative risk (95% CI) Patient no. Events No. of studies
All‐cause mortality (all studies) 0.52 (0.35, 0.76) 668 98 4
Unplanned or heart failure hospitalization (all studies) 0.58 (0.46, 0.73) 801 205 6
Summary estimates Mean difference (95% CI) Patient no. No. of studies
Improvement in LVEF (%)
All studies 6.30 (3.90, 8.71) 770 7
Newer studies 5.56 (2.15, 8.97) 551 3
Older studies 7.18 (3.39, 10.97) 219 4
Rate control as control group 8.33 (4.65, 12.02) 285 5
Pharmacological rate control as control group 8.12 (2.63, 13.61) 204 4
Only PsAF patients 6.56 (1.62, 11.51) 381 5
Improvement in MLHFQ score
All studies 9.58 (4.45, 14.71) 396 5
Newer studies 5.00 (‐0.30, 10.30) 177 1
Older studies 11.88 (6.60, 17.15) 219 4
Rate control as control group 11.88 (6.60, 17.15) 219 4
Pharmacological rate control as control group 11.73 (3.18, 20.29) 138 3
Only PsAF patients 9.07 (2.48, 15.66) 315 4
Improvement in 6MWD
All studies 31.78 (10.64, 52.93) 702 6
Newer studies 30.00 (‐0.40, 60.39) 537 3
Older studies 34.76 (2.87, 66.65) 165 3
Rate control only in control group 37.72 (13.11, 62.33) 231 4
Pharmacological rate control as control group 19.80 (‐12.72, 52.33) 150 3
Only PsAF patients 12.87 (2.03, 23.70) 327 4
Improvement in VO2 max score
All studies 3.17 (1.05, 5.28) 100 2