Skip to main content
. 2019 Feb 13;2019(2):CD013143. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013143.pub2

Comparison 2. Aquablation versus TURP (up to 6 months).

Outcome or subgroup title No. of studies No. of participants Statistical method Effect size
1 Urologic symptom scores (IPSS) 1   Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI) Totals not selected
2 Quality of life (IPSS‐QoL) 1   Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI) Totals not selected
3 Major adverse events 1   Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) Totals not selected
4 Retreatment 1   Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) Totals not selected
5 Erectile function (IIEF) 1   Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI) Totals not selected
6 Ejaculatory function (MSHQ‐EjD) 1   Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI) Totals not selected
7 Minor adverse events 1   Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) Totals not selected
8 Acute urinary retention 1   Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) Totals not selected
9 Indwelling urinary catheter (hours) 1   Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI) Totals not selected
10 Hospital stay (days) 1   Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI) Totals not selected