Skip to main content
. 2019 Feb 7;10:218. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00218

Table 3.

Theory of mind assessment and group comparison results.

HC N = 26 MS N = 42 MS/HC comparison p Partial η2, observed power RR N = 26 Pr N = 16 RR /Pr/HC comparison p Partial η2, observed power Bonferroni’s post hoc
ToM score [M, sd]
SS 6.00, 1.2 4.38, 1.38 200.50 0.000 0.27, 1.00 4.42, 1.42 4.31, 1.35 19.77° 0.000 0.27, 0.99 MS < HC
SSphysicalstories 6.12, 1.03 5.31, 1.66 398.00 - - 5.81, 1.47 4.50, 1.67 10.48° 0.005 0.18, 0.92 Pr < HC, RR
FP 17.23, 4.36 14.19, 6.00 2.24§ 0.028 0.07, 0,60 15.42, 4.43 12.19, 7.68 4.43£ 0.016 0.12, 0.74 Pr < HC
FPcontrolstories 3.58, 0.50 3.64, 0.73 -0.41§ - - 3.65, 0.48 3.63, 1.02 0.09§ - - -
MASC totalscore 29.85, 4.58 29.93, 6.01 -0.06§ - - 30.27, 2.97 29.38, 6.18 0.13£ - - -
Missingmentalizing 3.73, 2.34 4.05, 3.27 -0.43§ - - 3.92, 2.81 4.25, 3.99 0.15£ - - -
Under-mentalizing 5.31, 2.29 5.64, 2.94 -0.49§ - - 5.58, 2.98 5.75, 2.95 0.14£ - - -
Over-mentalizing 4.96, 2.64 4.48, 2.33 0.79§ - - 3.88, 2.20 5.44, 2.28 2.41£ - - -
Cognitive ToM [M, sd]
SSDoublebluff 0.66, 0.43 29.80 348.50 0.010 0.09, 0.72 0.37, 0.45 0.40,0.45 6.60° 0.037 0.09, 0.61 RR < HC
SSWhitelie 1.03, 0.15 29.37 330.50 0.002 0.12, 0.84 0.84, 0.34 0.76,0.35 10.97° 0.004 0.13, 0.78 MS < HC
SSMisunderstanding 0.81, 0.23 30.80 390.50 0.026 0.08, 0.68 0.65, 0.27 0.69,0.19 4.99° - - -
FPIntention 2.31, 0.74 1.67, 1.12 2.85§ 0.006 0.09, 0.72 1.73, 0.92 1.56, 1.41 3.46£ 0.037 0.10, 0.63 Pr < HC
MASC Thoughts 5.46, 1.27 5.26, 1.41 0.59§ - - 5.12, 1.34 5.50, 1.46 0.56£ - - -
Missingmentalizing 0.61, 0.64 34.48 545.00 - - 0.65, 0.69 0.69,1.01 0.12° - - -
Under-mentalizing 0.85, 0.73 33.55 506.00 - - 0.96, 1.22 0.75,1.12 0.81° - - -
Over-mentalizing 1.04, 0.92 36.36 468.00 - - 1.27,0.72 1.13,0.62 1.75° - - -
MASC Intention 13.08, 2.06 13.31, 3.29 -0.36§ - - 13.73, 2.97 12.63, 3.76 0.78£ - - -
Missingmentalizing 1.58, 1.27 33.46 502.50 - - 1.50, 1.36 1.62, 2.09 0.51° - - -
Under-mentalizing 1.62, 1.10 34.75 535.50 - - 1.50, 1.33 2.06, 1.69 1.12° - - -
Over-mentalizing 1.77, 1.42 32.61 466.50 - - 1.23, 1.39 1.69, 1.25 2.51° - - -
Affective ToM [M, sd]
SSEmotions 0.76, 0.27 34.10 529.00 - - 0.79, 0.26 0.66, 0.25 2.51° - - -
FPEmotion 2.85, 0.97 2.40, 1.17 1.61§ - - 2.62, 98 2.06, 1.39 2.62£ - - -
RMET 25.04, 3.30 23.83, 3.41 1.43§ - - 24.12, 2.75 23.38, 4.35 1.25£ - - -
MASCAffective 10.50,1.90 10.40, 2.14 0.19§ - - 10.77, 2.23 9.81, 1.90 1.11£ - - -
Missingmentalizing 1.54, 1.36 35.68 496.50 - - 1.77, 1.48 1.94, 1.77 0.44° - - -
Under-mentalizing 2.85, 1.46 35.92 486.50 - - 3.08, 1.38 2.88, 1.26 0.90° - - -
Over-mentalizing 2.12, 1.42 32.70 470.50 - - 1.31, 1.01 2.50, 1.32 9.14° 0.010 0.14, 0.83 RR < Pr

HC, healthy controls; FP, faux pas, M, mean; MASC, movie for the assessment of social cognition; MS, multiple sclerosis; RRMS, relapsing remitting multiple sclerosis; PrMS, progressive multiple sclerosis; RMET, reading the mind from the eyes test; sd, standard deviation. §T-test for independent samples was performed; Mann–Whitney test was performed; £One-way ANOVA was performed; °Kruskal–Wallis test was performed. Statistically significant results are reported in bold.